Document Detail

External validity reporting in behavioral treatment of childhood obesity a systematic review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22261216     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
CONTEXT: To aid translation of childhood obesity interventions evidence into practice, research studies must report results in a way that better supports pragmatic decision making. The current review evaluated the extent to which information on key external validity dimensions, participants, settings, interventions, outcomes, and maintenance of effects, was included in research studies on behavioral treatments for childhood obesity.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Peer-reviewed studies of behavioral childhood obesity treatments published between 1980 and 2008 were identified from (1) electronic searches of social science and medical databases; (2) research reviews of childhood obesity interventions; and (3) reference lists cited in these reviews. Included studies reported on a controlled obesity intervention trial, targeted overweight or obese children aged 2-18 years, included a primary or secondary anthropometric outcome, and targeted change in dietary intake or physical activity behaviors.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: 1071 publications were identified and 77 met selection criteria. Studies were coded on established review criteria for external validity elements. All studies lacked full reporting of generalizability elements. Across criteria, the average reporting was 23.9% (range=0%-100%). Infrequently reported were setting-level selection criteria and representativeness, characteristics regarding intervention staff, implementation of the intervention content, costs, and program sustainability.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced reporting of relevant and pragmatic information in behavioral investigations of childhood obesity interventions is needed to improve the ability to evaluate the applicability of results to practice implementation. Such evidence would improve translation of research to practice, provide additional explanation for variability in intervention outcomes, and provide insights into successful adaptations of interventions to local conditions.
Lisa M Klesges; Natalie A Williams; Kara S Davis; Joanna Buscemi; Katherine M Kitzmann
Related Documents :
1862166 - Response bias associated with asking former study participants to assist in new research.
12816126 - Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: grimes v. kennedy krieger ...
19092716 - Early career development in academic pediatrics of participants in the aps-spr medical ...
11931126 - Ethics of clinical research in children.
20008966 - The "shoulds" and "should nots" of moral emotions: a self-regulatory perspective on sha...
15258656 - Long-distance calls in neotropical primates.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of preventive medicine     Volume:  42     ISSN:  1873-2607     ISO Abbreviation:  Am J Prev Med     Publication Date:  2012 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-01-20     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8704773     Medline TA:  Am J Prev Med     Country:  Netherlands    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  185-92     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Physical Activity of Children Attending Afterschool Programs Research- and Practice-Based Implicatio...
Next Document:  Assessing the built environment using omnidirectional imagery.