| Exposing the glosses in Seligman and Fowler's (2011) straw-man arguments. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21967210 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
The author was disappointed to see an entire special issue of the American Psychologist (January 2011) devoted to military psychology, but he was especially concerned about the one-sided moral justifications presented by Seligman and Fowler (2011) in the final article of the issue. The author feels they misrepresented potential objections to their program and dismissed the inherent dangers of cooperation between organized psychology and the military. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved). |
| | |
Authors:
|
John Dyckman |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The American psychologist Volume: 66 ISSN: 1935-990X ISO Abbreviation: Am Psychol Publication Date: 2011 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-10-04 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0370521 Medline TA: Am Psychol Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 644-5 Citation Subset: IM |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: The dark side of comprehensive soldier fitness.
Next Document: Missing: Critical and skeptical perspectives on comprehensive soldier fitness.