Document Detail


Exploring the roles of saturating and supersaturating contrast-response functions in conjunction detection and contrast coding.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21862639     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
J. W. Peirce (2007, p. 1) has proposed that saturating contrast-response functions in V1 and V2 may form "a critical part of the selective detection of compound stimuli over their components" and that supersaturating (non-monotonic) functions allow even greater conjunction selectivity. Here, we argue that saturating and supersaturating contrast-response functions cannot be exploited by conjunction detectors in the way that Peirce proposes. First, the advantage of these functions only applies to conjunctions with components of lower contrast than the equivalent non-conjunction stimulus, e.g., plaids (conjunctions) vs. gratings (non-conjunctions); most types of conjunction do not have this property. Second, in many experiments, conjunction and non-conjunction components have identical contrast, sampling the contrast-response function at a single point, so the function's shape is irrelevant. Third, Peirce considered only maximum-contrast stimuli, whereas contrasts in natural scenes are low, corresponding to a contrast-response function's expansive region; we show that, for naturally occurring contrasts, Peirce's plaid detector would generally respond more weakly to plaids than to gratings. We also reassess Peirce's claim that supersaturating contrast-response functions are suboptimal for contrast coding; we argue that supersaturation improves contrast coding, and that the multiplicity of supersaturation levels reflects varying trade-offs between contrast coding and coding of other features.
Authors:
Keith A May; Li Zhaoping
Related Documents :
1667719 - Light-dependent atp synthesis in mitochondria.
21643419 - Luminance-based specular gloss characterization.
304709 - Light-activated, -inhibited and -independent denitrification by a denitrifying phototro...
9851909 - The self-referencing oxygen-selective microelectrode: detection of transmembrane oxygen...
23776299 - Ruthenium polypyridyl phototriggers: from beginnings to perspectives.
22105399 - Response of the worldwide side impact dummy (worldsid) to localized constant-speed impa...
22255139 - A vision-free brain-computer interface (bci) paradigm based on auditory selective atten...
12074949 - Texture-orientation mechanisms pool colour and luminance contrast.
17714719 - Effect of fatigue on the intra-cycle acceleration in front crawl swimming: a time-frequ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2011-08-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of vision     Volume:  11     ISSN:  1534-7362     ISO Abbreviation:  J Vis     Publication Date:  2011  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-08-24     Completed Date:  2012-01-05     Revised Date:  2013-01-09    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101147197     Medline TA:  J Vis     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  11     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, UCL, London, UK. keith@keithmay.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Algorithms*
Contrast Sensitivity / physiology*
Humans
Models, Neurological*
Neurons / physiology
Photic Stimulation
Visual Cortex / cytology,  physiology*
Visual Perception / physiology*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
BB/E002536/1//Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Implication of Ccr4-Not complex function in mRNA quality control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Next Document:  Efficacy of a computerized optokinetic nystagmus test in prediction of visual acuity of better than ...