Document Detail


Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12540466     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the technical aspects and evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endovascular management of mechanical complications related to implanted central venous devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients with cancer, who ranged in age from 3 months to 75 years (mean +/- SD, 47 +/- 18 years), were referred 290 +/- 200 days (mean +/- SD; range, 0-1202 days) after central venous device placement for retrieval of a fractured and embolized central venous device catheter (n = 100), retrieval of a guidewire embolized during placement of a central venous device (n = 2), repositioning of the migrated tip of a central venous device catheter (n = 38), and fibrin-sheath stripping (n = 16). All procedures were performed with the patient under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis, except for the eight pediatric patients. RESULTS: Ninety-five of the 100 embolized catheters and both of the guidewires were successfully retrieved. Retrieval was preceded by repositioning the embolized catheter with a pigtail catheter in 48 of these cases. Most of the procedures were performed with standard vascular tools (loop snares and pigtail catheters); the use of more sophisticated devices (grasping forceps, baskets, or balloons) rarely overcame the failure of a loop snare. Repositioning a migrated catheter tip was achieved with a pigtail catheter in 32 of 38 attempts. Of the repositioned catheters, only 24 could be used. Most of the 11 repositioning and retrieval failures were encountered because the catheter lacked a free end. Fibrin-sheath stripping was always technically successful: all these catheters were patent at 3-month follow-up. No procedure-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The endovascular approach is highly feasible, safe, and effective for the management of mechanical complications of central venous devices. It is probably advisable to reserve endovascular repositioning for port catheters that are cumbersome to exchange and to replace simple catheters.
Authors:
Bertrand Bessoud; Thierry de Baere; Viseth Kuoch; Eric Desruennes; Marie-France Cosset; Nathalie Lassau; Alain Roche
Related Documents :
22557916 - Type iii apical transportation of root canal.
12322816 - Malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheter and accompanying surgical pathology repaire...
17332966 - Laparoscopic-assisted peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: a microinvasive technique.
20808966 - Posterior interscalene block: an ultrasound-guided case series and overview of history,...
3399566 - Three successful digital replantations in a patient after 84, 86, and 94 hours of cold ...
1806646 - Phantom studies and preliminary clinical experience with the bsd 2000.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  180     ISSN:  0361-803X     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  2003 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-01-23     Completed Date:  2003-02-26     Revised Date:  2008-02-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  527-32     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Interventional Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Catheterization, Central Venous / adverse effects*,  instrumentation
Catheters, Indwelling / adverse effects*
Child
Child, Preschool
Device Removal
Equipment Failure
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms / therapy
Radiography, Interventional
Retrospective Studies

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Thymic enlargement and FDG uptake in three patients: CT and FDG positron emission tomography correla...
Next Document:  Feasibility study of NeoMend, a percutaneous arterial closure device that uses a nonthrombogenic bio...