Document Detail

Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22201474     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb received more than 4000 reports from healthcare professionals (HCPs). All HCPs received individual personal feedback containing information about the reported drug-adverse drug reaction (ADR) association. It is unclear what type of information HCPs expect in this feedback letter.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine the expectations of the personal feedback of HCPs who reported an ADR to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb.
METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted among a random sample of 1200 pharmacists, general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists who reported an ADR to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb between 1 January 2009 and 27 January 2010. Responders and non-responders were compared on the basis of profession, number of reports submitted to the pharmacovigilance since 2007 and their last report being serious or not. Questions were asked about the importance of personal feedback and the type of information reporters would like to see in their personal feedback. Both linear and logistic regression analysis were performed, with correction for possible confounding factors.
RESULTS: The response rate to the questionnaire was 34.6% (n = 399). The type of information the respondents generally would like to see in their personal feedback is information about the time course of the ADR and information about the pharmacological mechanism. However, GPs were, in general, less interested in receiving feedback than pharmacists and medical specialists. Most of the respondents were (very) unsatisfied if they received only a confirmation letter instead of personal feedback. Personalized feedback was considered to be (very) important for reporting an ADR in the future. Most of the respondents (80.3%) stated that the personal feedback increased their knowledge. Only 0.6% of respondents had not read the personalized feedback. No differences were found between responders and non-responders, with the exception that responders had reported statistically more often to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb in the past 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the respondents would like personal feedback instead of a standard confirmation letter. In general, pharmacists and medical specialists would like more information than GPs. The information in this study is useful in generating more customized personal feedback in the future, and could be useful for other pharmacovigilance centres that are interested in writing personalized feedback to make available to reporters.
Ingrid Oosterhuis; Florence P A M van Hunsel; Eugène P van Puijenbroek
Related Documents :
22073914 - The value of avoided births to underdeveloped countries.
21423794 - Catastrophizing and parental response to child symptom complaints.
22140094 - Applying bourdieu's theory to accounts of living with multimorbidity.
21898514 - Sex ratio affects sex-specific innovation and learning in captive ruffed lemurs (vareci...
24791134 - Jezebel at the welfare office: how racialized stereotypes of poor women's reproductive ...
23091454 - Neighborhood disadvantage and adolescent stress reactivity.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Drug safety     Volume:  35     ISSN:  0114-5916     ISO Abbreviation:  Drug Saf     Publication Date:  2012 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-02-20     Completed Date:  2012-05-17     Revised Date:  2014-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9002928     Medline TA:  Drug Saf     Country:  New Zealand    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  221-32     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems / standards*
Attitude of Health Personnel*
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions*
Health Personnel / psychology*
Regression Analysis

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Adeno-associated virus serotype 9 transduction in the central nervous system of nonhuman primates.
Next Document:  Methods for assessing the preventability of adverse drug events: a systematic review.