|"Expectant Parents": Study protocol of a longitudinal study concerning prenatal (risk) factors and postnatal infant development, parenting, and parent-infant relationships.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22686874 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: While the importance of the infant-parent relationship from the child's perspective is acknowledged worldwide, there is still a lack of knowledge about predictors and long-term benefits or consequences of the quality of parent-infant relationships from the parent's perspective. The purpose of this prospective study is to investigate the quality of parent-infant relationships from parents' perspectives, both in the prenatal and postpartum period. This study therefore focuses on prenatal (risk) factors that may influence the quality of pre- and postnatal bonding, the transition to parenthood, and bonding as a process within families with young children. In contrast to most research concerning pregnancy and infant development, not only the roles and experiences of mothers during pregnancy and the first two years of infants' lives are studied, but also those of fathers.
METHODS/DESIGN: The present study is a prospective longitudinal cohort study, in which pregnant women (N = 466) and their partners (N = 319) are followed from 15 weeks gestation until their child is 24 months old. During pregnancy, midwives register the presence of prenatal risk factors and provide obstetric information after the child's birth. Parental characteristics are investigated using self-report questionnaires at 15, 26, and 36 weeks gestational age and at 4, 6, 12, and 24 months postpartum. At 26 weeks of pregnancy and at 6 months postpartum, parents are interviewed concerning their representations of the (unborn) child. At 6 months postpartum, the mother-child interaction is observed in several situations within the home setting. When children are 4, 6, 12, and 24 months old, parents also completed questionnaires concerning the child's (social-emotional) development and the parent-child relationship. Additionally, at 12 months information about the child's physical development and well-being during the first year of life is retrieved from National Health Care Centres.
DISCUSSION: The results of this study may contribute to early identification of families at risk for adverse parent-infant relationships, infant development, or parenting. Thereby this study will be relevant for the development of policy, practice, and theory concerning infant mental health.
|A Janneke B M Maas; Charlotte M J M Vreeswijk; Evi S A de Cock; Catharina H A M Rijk; Hedwig J A van Bakel|
Related Documents :
|22297384 - An association account of false belief understanding.
3459094 - Epidemiology of cot deaths in auckland.
23342714 - The state of south dakota's child: 2012.
23998234 - Prenatal determinants of cord blood total immunoglobulin e levels in mexican newborns.
7440104 - Visual acuity screening of preterm infants.
20409294 - Geospatial distribution and determinants of child mortality in rural western kenya 2002...
|Type: Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2012-06-11|
|Title: BMC pregnancy and childbirth Volume: 12 ISSN: 1471-2393 ISO Abbreviation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Publication Date: 2012|
|Created Date: 2012-10-30 Completed Date: 2013-03-14 Revised Date: 2013-07-12|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 100967799 Medline TA: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 46 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, 5000, Tilburg, the Netherlands.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Publisher: BioMed Central
Copyright ©2012 Maas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Received Day: 28 Month: 3 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 23 Month: 5 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 11 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Volume: 12First Page: 46 Last Page: 46
PubMed Id: 22686874
Publisher Id: 1471-2393-12-46
|“Expectant Parents”: Study protocol of a longitudinal study concerning prenatal (risk) factors and postnatal infant development, parenting, and parent-infant relationships|
|A Janneke BM Maas1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Charlotte MJM Vreeswijk1||Email: email@example.com|
|Evi SA de Cock1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Catharina HAM Rijk1||Email: email@example.com|
|Hedwig JA van Bakel12||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
1Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Room P-704, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, Tilburg, the Netherlands
2Centre of Infant Mental Health, Dimence, Deventer, the Netherlands
Developmental research has firmly established the quality of the relationship between an infant and his or her parent as an important factor influencing the child’s later development [1-6]. When children develop a secure relationship with their parents or caregivers in their first years of life, they generally have better cognitive outcomes, better social interactions, display less behavioral problems, and achieve better at school . Research in this area has mainly investigated the attachment relationships that infants form with their parents, thus focusing on the child’s perspective of the relationship. In contrast, the attachment relationship from the parent’s perspective has not been frequently studied. This concept, also known as bonding, may be of equal importance to later child development as the traditionally studied concept of infant-to-parent attachment. More research concerning predictors and long-term benefits or consequences of bonding is therefore needed .
The development of the parent-infant attachment relationship does not start after the child is born, but already evolves during pregnancy [9,10]. The relationship a parent forms with the fetus is often referred to as prenatal attachment and has been described as the earliest, most basic form of human intimacy . Several definitions of prenatal attachment have been provided, many conceptualized in health research, but it is generally defined as the emotional tie or bond that develops between expectant parents and their fetus [12,13]. Researchers have pointed out that it is important to study prenatal attachment and factors related to its development, since it provides insightful information on later parent-infant bonding . Several studies found that the quality of the parent-fetus relationship was related to the quality of postnatal parent-infant relationships [14-17]. It is assumed that the prenatal parent-infant relationship influences the parent’s daily interactions with the child after birth and subsequently affects the quality of the parent-infant relationship and development.
Next to these feelings of attachment during pregnancy, research concerning the parent-fetus relationship has focused on another concept known as internal working models or representations of the unborn child [18,19]. Representations are described as a set of tendencies to behave in particular ways in intimate relationships . They provide information about the ‘meaning’ a child has to his or her parent by asking the parent about his or her experiences with and perceptions of the fetus, (future) parenting, and the relationship with the fetus. The majority of research concerning internal working models has focused on postnatal representations, while studies on parents’ prenatal representations are scarce. Since prenatal representations are found to be related to postnatal representations and postnatal parent-infant interaction, it is important that the quality of prenatal representations and its consequences are also further investigated [14,17,21]. In addition, it is unknown whether discrepancies between pre- and postnatal representations lead to parental adjustment problems once the child is born, possibly affecting the quality of postnatal bonding and later child outcomes.
Parent-infant attachment or bonding develops further after birth and continues to develop beyond the early postnatal period . Surprisingly, empirical research into the determinants, consequences, and stability of postnatal bonding is also limited . Only a few studies have examined predictors and consequences of postnatal bonding and they suggest that prematurity, domestic violence during pregnancy, and maternal postpartum mood are related to adverse maternal bonding and adverse parent-infant interactions [24-27]. Moreover, Brockington  stressed that both severe disturbances, as well as less severe problems with parental bonding may lead to more negative parental care and may subsequently result in various forms of child abuse or neglect. Therefore, several parental, infant, and contextual risk factors are expected to influence the quality of the bonding process.
The present study has been designed to investigate prenatal (risk) factors that may influence the quality of pre- and postnatal parent-infant relationships and postnatal infant development within families with young children. Several determinants and consequences of the early parent-infant relationship will be investigated. Already during pregnancy, prenatal risk factors influencing the quality of the parent-infant relationship and later child development can be identified . For example, emotional problems of mothers during pregnancy, problems in mothers’ own childhood history, and deficits in parental cognitive functioning increase the possibility of problematic caregiving and child development [30,31]. However, there is still considerable debate and a lack of knowledge about how specific risk factors are related to the long-term benefits or consequences of the parent-infant relationship. In contrast to most research concerning pregnancy and infant development, this study does not only focus on maternal characteristics, but also on the roles and experiences of fathers during pregnancy and the first two years of the infants’ lives.
The following topics and research questions related to the parent-infant relationship will therefore be investigated in the current study:
1)The relationship between prenatal (risk) factors, postnatal infant development and quality of the parent-infant relationship. Can specific prenatal risk factors for adverse infant development, parenting, or parent-infant relationships be identified during pregnancy?
2)The transition to parenthood. Is there a discrepancy between the quality of prenatal and postnatal parent-infant relationships and parents’ representations of the child? Do parents’ prenatal expectations of the child’s characteristics meet their postnatal experiences? How are these factors related to infant behavior and development?
3)Parental bonding over time. What are the stability and change in parents’ feelings of bonding over time? Is the quality of early parent-infant bonding related to later child development?
Between November 2008 and July 2009, 835 pregnant women were invited by their midwives to participate in this study. Four midwifery practices in Eindhoven, the 5th largest city of the Netherlands, agreed to participate in the study. At the first routine visit (between 9–15 weeks gestational age), midwives gave mothers information about the purpose of the study and invited them to participate. The oral information was accompanied by an information brochure with specific information about the study, which each mother received. If mothers were interested in participation, one of the researchers contacted them by phone to provide additional information and asked whether mothers wanted to enroll in the study. Partners were not directly approached by the researchers but the mothers were informed about the importance of involvement of their partners in the study. After parents received oral and written information about the protocol, both parents were asked for written consent. The informed consent form consisted of three different options. Parents could consent to (1) active participation in the complete research protocol, including two home visits, (2) active participation by filling in questionnaires but not by participating in home visits, or (3) passive participation by allowing the researchers to gather information from the midwife and National Health Care Centres, but without home visits or filling in questionnaires. Separate informed consent forms were sent to mothers and their partners. Once parents returned the signed forms, enrollment in the study was complete.
The “Expectant Parents” [“In Verwachting”] study protocol has been financed and approved by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, Grant 80-82405-98-074/157001020). It was also approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg (date: 13-08-2008, register number: NL 23376.008.08).
Of the 835 invited women, women with a poor understanding of the Dutch and English language, those expecting multiple births, and women who were over 20 weeks of gestation at enrollment, were excluded from participation. Reasons for not giving written consent were withdrawal by the mother, miscarriage, and non-responding mothers. As Figure 1 demonstrates, this resulted in 466 completed informed consent forms of expectant mothers and 319 informed consents of their partners. All parents hereby gave permission to the researchers to retrieve information about the pregnancy and delivery from their midwives and information about the development of the child in the first year of life from National Health Care Centres. Of these parents, 409 mothers and 319 fathers agreed to complete questionnaires, of which 311 mothers and 243 fathers also agreed to participate during home visits (full participation).
The present study is a prospective longitudinal cohort study, in which pregnant women and their partners were followed from 15 weeks gestation until their child was 24 months old. As can be seen in Figure 2, pregnant women completed questionnaires at 15, 26, and 36 weeks gestational age. At 26 weeks of pregnancy, their partners also completed a questionnaire. At the same time a home visit took place during which a standardized interview concerning the prenatal representations of the unborn child was conducted with both parents separately.
Postnatally, there were five more measurement waves (at birth and at 4, 6, 12, and 24 months postpartum). Obstetric information about the birth of the child, including birth weight, Apgar score, and possible complications was registered by the midwives in line with their general practice guidelines. Additionally, midwives provided information about the presence of possible prenatal risk factors within families by completing an adapted Dutch version of the Dunedin Family Services Indicator (DFSI) . At 4 and 6 months postnatally, both parents received questionnaires. At the child’s age of 6 months, an interview about the representations of their child was administered with both parents at their home, and the mother-child interaction was observed in several contexts within the home. Interviews generally lasted between 30 and 60 minutes and the observation of mother-infant interactions lasted approximately 20 minutes. All home visits were video-recorded. When children were 12 months old, mothers completed questionnaires concerning the child’s (social-emotional) development and information about the child’s physical development and well-being during the first year of life was retrieved from National Health Care Centres. At the child’s age of 24 months, the last measures concerning parental characteristics, the parent–child relationship, and the child’s development were completed by both parents.
Figure 3 shows which variables were investigated at different time points during the study. Generally, the study measures can be classified according to whether they concern parental characteristics, infant characteristics, or the parent-infant relationship. Therefore, the selected instruments are described below according to these categories.
Parental characteristics were investigated using self-report questionnaires. To assess parental psychological well-being, the following questionnaires were used: Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) , State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) , Symptom Check List; anxiety, depression, and hostility subscale (SCL-90) , Symptoms of Anxiety-Depression index (SAD-4) , and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) .
To assess parents’ personality characteristics, the Quick Big Five (QBF) , Type D Scale (DS14) , and Ego Resiliency 89 Scale (ER89)  were administered. Adult attachment style was measured with the Relationship Questionnaire Clinical Version (RQ-CV)  and the partner-relationship was evaluated with a subscale of the Questionnaire on Family Problems (Vragenlijst voor Gezinsproblemen; VGP) .
The Placenta Paradigm Questionnaire (PPQ)  and the Facilitator Regulator Questionnaire (FRQ)  were used to determine maternal orientations on pregnancy and their infants. Midwives used an adapted version of the Dunedin Family Services Indicator (DFSI)  to register the presence of possible prenatal risk factors among parents.
The following questionnaires were used to investigate infant development and behavior: Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) , Ages and Stages Questionnaire; Social-Emotional (ASQ-SE) , Infant Characteristics Questionnaire (ICQ) , Infant Toddler Social-Emotional Assessment (ITSEA) , Brief Infant Toddler Social-Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) , subscales of the Infant Behavior Questionnaire Revised (IBQ-R) , Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (ECBQ) , and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Preschool version (BRIEF-P) .
Information about the child’s physical development and well-being during the first year of life was retrieved from National Health Care Centres.
To determine parents’ representations of their (unborn) infant, the Working Model of the Child Interview (WMCI)  was conducted during home visits. At the same time and also at 24 months, the Pictorial Representations of Attachment Measure (PRAM) , a non-verbal measure of the parent-infant relationship, was administered. To evaluate the quality of mother-infant interactions, the NICHD scales  were used.
In addition, the following questionnaires were used to give insight into the parent-fetus and parent–child relationship: Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) , Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale (MPAS) , Paternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (PAAS) , Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale (PPAS) , Parental Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ) , and Attachment Difficulties Screening Instrument (ADSI) .
To evaluate parenting behavior, the following scales were used: the Parental Stress Index (Nijmeegse Ouderlijke Stress Index-verkort; NOSI-K) , and Perceived Maternal Parenting Self Efficacy (PMP-SE) .
The logistics of this study were carried out by three researchers (AM, CV, EdC) in close collaboration with the midwives participating in this study. Before starting data collection, a protocol was set up and discussed with participating midwives to ensure that a uniform protocol was followed by all midwifery practices. Participating midwives were instructed on how to recruit pregnant women for participation in the study and how to register the presence of possible prenatal risk factors.
Questionnaires were sent to parents one or two weeks before the time point they should be completed or before the home-visits. All questionnaires were available in Dutch and English. Reminders were sent when parents failed to return the questionnaires. Table 1 shows the number of parents that participated at each measurement wave.
The researchers (AM, CV, CR) and several research assistants were trained to administer and code the WMCI, concerning parents’ representations of their (unborn) children and to code observations of mother-child interactions. All interviews and mother-infant interactions were video-recorded and coded afterwards. A random subgroup of the interviews and observations was coded by more than one coder to determine inter-rater reliability.
Collected data were entered into an electronic database. Random samples of all manually processed questionnaires were double checked by the researchers to monitor the quality of the manual data entry. All measurements were checked by examination of the data, including their ranges, distributions, means, standard deviations, outliers, and logical errors.
Databases needed for answering specific research questions were centrally built from databases concerning different time points of the study. All information enabling identification of participants was erased from these databases, except identification numbers of each participant. Video-recordings of participants were stored on the computers of the researchers, which are only accessible with a password and not on web-based directories.
To answer the various research questions we will use structural equation modeling, regression analyses (HMR analyses), logistic regression analyses, and odds-ratio’s. Mediation and moderation analyses will follow Baron and Kenny’s requirements . The power calculation is based on one of the main questions that will be addressed about the effects of prenatal (risk) factors on infant development. Assuming a moderate effect size of .30 or .40, a power of .80 (i.e., the minimal power for a similar study by Cohen ), an alpha of .05, and 11 parameters/predictors, we need a sample size of 220 participants (the power will be .83 with p = 11, r² = .09 or the power will be .99 with p = 11, r² = .16). Abovementioned power calculations are exact calculations, based on results of Gatsonis and Sampson . Allowing for loss to follow-up by 24 months postpartum, we estimated that a sample of at least 240–260 women would be sufficient to test our hypotheses.
With this study we aim to gain more insight into the relationships between prenatal (risk) factors, postnatal infant development and the quality of the pre- and postnatal parent-infant relationship. This investigation will lead to more knowledge about the transition to parenthood for both mothers and fathers, and the stability and change in parents’ feelings of bonding over time. The longitudinal design with a multi-informant, multimethod approach offers the possibility to predict infant developmental outcomes in the first years of life from pregnancy onwards.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study protocol was developed by HvB, in collaboration with AM, CV, EdC, and CR at the department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. AM and CV were appointed as PhD-students in 2008 and executed the study until children were 12 months old. These authors contributed equally to this work. EdC was appointed to the project as a PhD-student in a later phase and executed the study until children were 24 months old. All collaborators are considered as co-authors as they have significantly contributed to developing this research, obtaining the data, and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
AM, CV, EdC, CR: Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. HvB: Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands and Centre of Infant Mental Health, Dimence, Deventer, the Netherlands.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
We would like to thank all families participating in this study. This study is conducted in collaboration with four midwifery practices in Eindhoven, the Netherlands, and we gratefully acknowledge their contributions to the study and their help in recruiting participants. We also collaborated with ZuidZorg National Health Care Centres in Eindhoven, the Netherlands, who provided information about children’s development throughout the first year of life. The “Expectant Parents” study was made possible by the financial support from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, Grant 80-82405-98-074/157001020).
|DeKleyn M,Greenberg MT,Cassidy J, Shaver PRAttachment and psychopathology in childhood (Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications).Year: 20082Guilford Press, New York637665|
|Lyons-Ruth K,Jacobvitz D,Cassidy J, Shaver PRAttachment disorganization: Genetic factors, parenting contexts, and developmental transformation from infancy to adulthood (Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications).Year: 20082Guilford Press, New York666697|
|Rees CA,Thinking about children’s attachmentsArch Dis ChildYear: 200590101058106510.1136/adc.2004.06865016177163|
|Sroufe LA,Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthoodAttachment Hum DevYear: 20057434936710.1080/14616730500365928|
|Sroufe LA,Egeland B,Carlson EA,Collins WA,The development of the person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation From Birth to AdulthoodYear: 2005Guilford Press, New York|
|Weinfield NS,Sroufe A,Egeland B,Carlson E,Cassidy J, Shaver PRIndividual differences in infant- caregiver attachment: Conceptual and empirical aspects of security (Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications).Year: 20082Guilford Press, New York78101|
|Thompson RA,Cassidy J, Shaver PREarly attachment and later development: Familiar questions, new answers (Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications).Year: 20082Guilford Press, New York348365|
|Barlow J,Svanberg PO,Barlow J, Svanberg POKeeping the baby in mind: Infant mental health in practice (Keeping the baby in mind).Year: 2009Taylor & Francis Group, New York114|
|Brandon A,Pitts S,Denton W,Stringer A,Evans H,A History of the Theory of Prenatal AttachmentJ Prenat Perinat Psychol HealthYear: 200923420122221533008|
|Raphael-Leff J,Psychological Processes of ChildbearingYear: 2005The Anna Freud Centre, London|
|Condon JT,Corkindale C,The correlates of antenatal attachment in pregnant womenBr J Med PsycholYear: 199770435937210.1111/j.2044-8341.1997.tb01912.x9429755|
|Condon JT,The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: Development of a questionnaire instrumentBr J Med PsycholYear: 199366216718310.1111/j.2044-8341.1993.tb01739.x8353110|
|Cranley MS,Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancyNurs ResYear: 19813052812846912989|
|Benoit D,Parker KCH,Zeanah CH,Mothers' Representations of Their Infants Assessed Prenatally: Stability and Association with Infants' Attachment ClassificationsJ Child Psychol PsychiatryYear: 199738330731310.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01515.x9232477|
|Müller ME,Prenatal and Postnatal Attachment: A Modest CorrelationJ Obstet Gynecol Neonatal NursYear: 199625216116610.1111/j.1552-6909.1996.tb02420.x|
|Siddiqui A,Hägglöf B,Does maternal prenatal attachment predict postnatal mother–infant interaction?Early Hum DevYear: 2000591132510.1016/S0378-3782(00)00076-110962164|
|Theran SA,Levendosky AA,Bogat AG,Huth-Bocks AC,Stability and change in mothers' internal representations of their infants over timeAttachment Hum DevYear: 20057325326810.1080/14616730500245609|
|Ainsworth MS,Bowlby J,An ethological approach to personality developmentAm PsycholYear: 1991464333341|
|Bretherton I,The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary AinsworthDev PsycholYear: 1992285759775|
|Zeanah CH,Smyke AT,Zeanah CHAttachment Disorders (Handbook of Infant Mental Health).Year: 20093Guilford Press, New York|
|Dayton CJ,Levendosky AA,Davidson WS,Bogat GA,The child as held in the mind of the mother: The influence of prenatal maternal representations on parenting behaviorsInfant Ment Health JYear: 201031222024110.1002/imhj.20253|
|Bruschweiler-Stern N,The Neonatal Moment of Meeting—Building the Dialogue, Strengthening the BondChild Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North AmYear: 200918353354410.1016/j.chc.2009.02.001|
|Benoit D,Infant-parent attachment: Definition, types, antecedents, measurement and outcomePaediatr Child HealthYear: 20049854119680481|
|Nicol-Harper R,Harvey AG,Stein A,Interactions between mothers and infants: Impact of maternal anxietyInfant Behav DevYear: 200730116116710.1016/j.infbeh.2006.08.00517292789|
|Reck C,Hunt A,Fuchs T,Weiss R,Noon A,Moehler E,Downing G,Tronick EZ,Mundt C,Interactive regulation of affect in postpartum depressed mothers and their infants: an overviewPsychopathologyYear: 200437627228010.1159/00008198315539778|
|Singer LT,Fulton S,Davillier M,Koshy D,Salvator A,Baley JE,Effects of Infant Risk Status and Maternal Psychological Distress on Maternal-Infant Interactions During the First Year of LifeJ Dev Behav PediatrYear: 200324423324110.1097/00004703-200308000-0000312915795|
|Zeitlin D,Dhanjal T,Colmsee M,Maternal-foetal bonding: the impact of domestic violence on the bonding process between a mother and childArch Wom Ment HealthYear: 19992418318910.1007/s007370050047|
|Brockington IF,Aucamp HM,Fraser C,Severe disorders of the mother–infant relationship: definitions and frequencyArch Wom Ment HealthYear: 20069524325110.1007/s00737-006-0133-0|
|Wilson LM,Reid AJ,Midmer DK,Biringer A,Carroll JC,Stewart DE,Antenatal psychosocial risk factors associated with adverse postpartum family outcomesCMAJ Can Med Assoc JYear: 19961546785|
|Davis EP,Snidman N,Wadhwa PD,Glynn LM,Schetter CD,Sandman CA,Prenatal Maternal Anxiety and Depression Predict Negative Behavioral Reactivity in InfancyInfancyYear: 20046331933110.1207/s15327078in0603_1|
|Muir RC,Monaghan SM,Gilmore RJ,Clarkson JE,Crooks TJ,Egan TG,Predicting child abuse and neglect in New ZealandAustralas PsychiatrYear: 1989232255260|
|Cox JL,Holden JM,Sagovsky R,Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression ScaleBr J Psychiatr Journal Ment SciYear: 198715078278610.1192/bjp.150.6.782|
|Spielberger CD,Gorsuch RL,Lushene RE,Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety InventoryYear: 1970Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA|
|Arrindell WA,Ettema JHM,SCL-90 Symptom checklist: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator [SCL-90 Symptom checklist: Manual to a multidimensional psychopathology indicator]Year: 2003Swets Test Publishers, Lisse|
|Denollet J,Strik JJ,Lousberg R,Honig A,Recognizing increased risk of depressive comorbidity after myocardial infarction: Looking for 4 symptoms of anxiety-depressionPsychother PsychosomYear: 200675634635210.1159/00009544017053335|
|Cohen S,Kamarck T,Mermelstein R,A global measure of perceived stressJ Heal Soc BehavYear: 198324438539610.2307/2136404|
|Vermulst AA,Gerris JRM,Quick Big Five persoonlijkheidstest [The Quick Big Five personality test]Year: 2005LDC Publishers, Leeuwarden, NL|
|Denollet J,DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personalityPsychosom MedYear: 2005671899710.1097/01.psy.0000149256.81953.4915673629|
|Block J,Kremen AM,IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separatenessJ Personal Soc PsycholYear: 1996702349361|
|Holmes BM,Lyons-Ruth K,The relationship questionnaire-clinical version (RQ- CV): Introducing a profoundly-distrustful attachment styleInfant Ment Health JYear: 200627331032510.1002/imhj.2009417710115|
|Koot HM,Handleiding bij de Vragenlijst voor Gezinsproblemen [Manual Questionnaire on Family Problems]Year: 1997Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sophia Children`s Hospital, Rotterdam|
|Raphael-Leff J,Facilitators and regulators: two approaches to motheringBr J Med PsycholYear: 198356437939010.1111/j.2044-8341.1983.tb01571.x6661409|
|Bricker D,Squires J,Mounts L,Ages and Stages Questionnaire: A parent- completed, child-monitoring systemYear: 1995Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD|
|Squires J,Bricker D,Twombly E,Ages & Stages Questionnaires-Social- Emotional: A parent-completed, child-monitoring system for social-emotional behaviorsYear: 2002Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc, Baltimore|
|Bates JE,Freeland CA,Lounsbury ML,Measurement of infant difficultnessChild DevYear: 197950379480310.2307/1128946498854|
|Carter AS,Briggs-Gowan MJ,Manual of the Infant-Toddler Social-Emotional AssessmentYear: 2000Yale University, New Haven, CT|
|Briggs-Gowan MJ,Carter AS,Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) mannual, version 2.0Year: 2002Yale University, New Haven, CT|
|Gartstein MA,Rothbart MK,Studying infant temperament via the Revised Infant Behavior QuestionnaireInfant Behav DevYear: 2003261648610.1016/S0163-6383(02)00169-8|
|Putnam SP,Gartstein MA,Rothbart MK,Measurement of fine-grained aspects of toddler temperament: The early childhood behavior questionnaireInfant Behav DevYear: 200629338640110.1016/j.infbeh.2006.01.00417138293|
|Gioia GA,Espy KA,Isquith PK,Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Preschool Version (BRIEF-P)Year: 2002Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL|
|Zeanah CH,Benoit D,Barton ML,Hirshberg L,Working model of the child interview coding manualYear: 1996 Unpublished manuscript.|
|Van Bakel HJA,Vreeswijk CMJM,Maas AJBM,Pictorial and verbal representations of prenatal attachment [abstract]J Reprod Infant PsycholYear: 200927323|
|NICHD, Early Child Care Research NetworkChild Care and Mother-Child Interaction in the First 3 Years of LifeDev PsycholYear: 19993561399141310563730|
|Condon JT,Corkindale CJ,The assessment of parent-to-infant attachment: Development of a self-report questionnaire instrumentJ Reprod Infant PsycholYear: 1998161577610.1080/02646839808404558|
|Condon JT,Corkindale CJ,Boyce P,Assessment of postnatal paternal-infant attachment: development of a questionnaire instrumentJ Reprod Infant PsycholYear: 200826319521010.1080/02646830701691335|
|Brockington IF,Oates J,George S,Turner D,Vostanis P,Sullivan M,Loh C,Murdoch C,A Screening Questionnaire for mother-infant bonding disordersArch Wom Ment HealthYear: 20013413314010.1007/s007370170010|
|Stams GJJM,Hoeve M,Asscher JJ,Colonnesi C,Noom MJ,Polderman N,Kellaert-Knol M,Validation of the Attachment Difficulties Screening Inventory 2–5 YearsSubmitted for publicationYear: 2011|
|de Brock AJLL,Vermulst AA,Gerris JRM,Abidin RR,NOSI. Nijmeegse Ouderlijke Stress Index. Handleiding experimentele versieYear: 1992Swets en Zeitlinger, Lisse|
|Barnes CR,Adamson-Macedo EN,Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP S-E) tool: development and validation with mothers of hospitalized preterm neonatesJ Adv NursYear: 200760555056010.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04445.x17973719|
|Baron RM,Kenny DA,The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerationsJ Personal Soc PsycholYear: 19865161173|
|Cohen J,Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencesYear: 1988Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale|
|Gatsonis C,Sampson AR,Multiple correlation: Exact power and sample size calculationsPsychol BullYear: 198910635162813654|
[Figure ID: F1]
Flow chart of study population ‘Expectant Parents’.
[Figure ID: F2]
Time line study protocol ‘Expectant Parents’.
[Figure ID: F3]
Study protocol and assessments at different time points during the study.
Number of participants per time point of the study protocol
|T1: 15 weeks gestation
|T2: 26 weeks gestation
|T3: 36 weeks gestation
||Information concerning the birth
||DFSI completed by midwife
|T5: 4 months postpartum
|T6: 6 months postpartum
|T7: 12 months postpartum
||National Health Care Centres
|T8: 24 months postpartum||Questionnaires||248b||186b|
a Data currently not complete.
b For T8, 285 mothers and 246 fathers were approached.
Keywords: Attachment, Bonding, Mother, Father, Pregnancy, Risk factors, Representations, Infant.
Previous Document: Understanding Heterogeneity in Borderline Personality Disorder: Differences in Affective Reactivity ...
Next Document: SMARCB1/INI1 inactivation in renal medullary carcinoma.