Document Detail

Exercise capacity and all-cause mortality in African American and Caucasian men with type 2 diabetes.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19196898     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between exercise capacity and mortality in African Americans and Caucasians with type 2 diabetes and to explore racial differences regarding this relationship.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: African American (n = 1,703; aged 60 +/- 10 years) and Caucasian (n = 1,445; aged 62 +/- 10 years) men with type 2 diabetes completed a maximal exercise test between 1986 and 2007 at the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in Washington, DC, and Palo Alto, California. Three fitness categories were established (low-, moderate-, and high-fit) based on peak METs achieved. Subjects were followed for all-cause mortality for 7.3 +/- 4.7 years.
RESULTS: The adjusted mortality risk was 23% higher in African Americans than in Caucasians (hazard ratio 1.23 [95% CI 1.1-1.4]). A graded reduction in mortality risk was noted with increased exercise capacity for both races. There was a significant interaction between race and METs (P < 0.001) and among race and fitness categories (P < 0.001). The association was stronger for Caucasians. Each 1-MET increase in exercise capacity yielded a 19% lower risk for Caucasians and 14% for African Americans (P < 0.001). Similarly, the risk was 43% lower (0.57 [0.44-0.73]) for moderate-fit and 67% lower (0.33 [0.22-0.48]) for high-fit Caucasians. The comparable reductions in African Americans were 34% (0.66 [0.55-0.80]) and 46% (0.54 [0.39-0.73]), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise capacity is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality in African American and Caucasian men with type 2 diabetes. The exercise capacity-related reduction in mortality appears to be stronger and more graded for Caucasians than for African Americans.
Authors:
Peter Kokkinos; Jonathan Myers; Eric Nylen; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Athanasios Manolis; Andreas Pittaras; Marc R Blackman; Roshney Jacob-Issac; Charles Faselis; Joshua Abella; Steven Singh
Related Documents :
17283578 - Systemic lupus erythematosus and exercise.
7184318 - Exercise effect on the circadian rhythm of left ventricular systole in healthy men with...
11387588 - Physical exercise and/or enriched foods for functional improvement in frail, independen...
20469058 - Facing up to fitness.
11487758 - Responses of non-obese white children to treadmill exercise.
6891308 - Transcutaneous versus arterial oxygen tension during exercise in chronic pulmonary dise...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2009-02-05
Journal Detail:
Title:  Diabetes care     Volume:  32     ISSN:  1935-5548     ISO Abbreviation:  Diabetes Care     Publication Date:  2009 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-04-01     Completed Date:  2009-07-29     Revised Date:  2013-06-02    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7805975     Medline TA:  Diabetes Care     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  623-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. peter.kokkinos@va.gov
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
African Continental Ancestry Group / statistics & numerical data*
Aged
Blood Pressure
California / epidemiology
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / mortality*,  physiopathology*
Diabetic Angiopathies / epidemiology
District of Columbia / epidemiology
European Continental Ancestry Group / statistics & numerical data*
Exercise*
Heart Rate
Humans
Hypertension / epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Physical Fitness*
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Diabetes Care
Journal ID (hwp): diacare
Journal ID (pmc): dcare
Journal ID (publisher-id): Diabetes Care
ISSN: 0149-5992
ISSN: 1935-5548
Publisher: American Diabetes Association
Article Information
Download PDF
? 2009 by the American Diabetes Association.
creative-commons: Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
Received Day: 15 Month: 10 Year: 2008
Accepted Day: 23 Month: 12 Year: 2008
Print publication date: Month: 4 Year: 2009
Electronic publication date: Day: 5 Month: 2 Year: 2009
Volume: 32 Issue: 4
First Page: 623 Last Page: 628
Publisher Id: 1876
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1876
PubMed Id: 19196898

Exercise Capacity and All-Cause Mortality in African American and Caucasian Men With Type 2 Diabetes
Peter Kokkinos, PHD12
Jonathan Myers, PHD34
Eric Nylen, MD1
Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos, PHD1
Athanasios Manolis, MD15
Andreas Pittaras, MD1
Marc R. Blackman, MD1
Roshney Jacob-Issac, MD6
Charles Faselis, MD1
Joshua Abella, MD3
Steven Singh, MD12
1Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC;
2Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC;
3Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California;
4Stanford University, Stanford, California;
5Asklepeion General Hospitals/Cardiology, Athens, Greece;
6George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Peter Kokkinos, peter.kokkinos@va.gov.

Poor exercise capacity is a well-established independent predictor of cardiovascular and overall mortality among healthy subjects and patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD) (1, B2, B3, B4?5), whereas increased physical activity and higher cardiorespiratory fitness confer health benefits in proportion to the level of fitness (1,2,6), independent of BMI (3,4). Increases in physical activity patterns have thus emerged as an integral part of the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes (5, B6?7).

African Americans have a two- to sixfold higher risk for developing diabetes (8) and approximately double the diabetes death rate (9) compared with Caucasians. Socioeconomic and quality of health care differences have been cited as possible reasons for this apparent racial disparity (10, B11?12). When access to health care is comparable, significantly lower overall mortality rates were reported among a National population of African American veterans versus Caucasians with diabetes (10).

An intriguing finding is that African American diabetic subjects exhibit significantly lower exercise capacity than do Caucasian diabetic subjects (13). The relationship between exercise capacity and mortality risk in African American diabetic subjects has not been reported previously, and possible racial differences regarding this relationship have not been explored.

The Veterans Health Administration in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System ensures equal access to high-quality health care independent of a patient's financial status (14). In addition, the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) electronic health information database is well suited to determine mortality accurately (15), thus providing an opportunity to assess the association between exercise capacity and mortality under comparable medical care.

In the present study, we assessed the relationship between exercise capacity and all-cause mortality in diabetic subjects and possible racial differences regarding this relationship.


RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Between July 1986 and 30 November 2007, a symptom-limited exercise tolerance test (ETT) was administered to veterans with type 2 diabetes at the VAMC in Washington, DC, and Palo Alto, California, either as part of routine evaluations or to assess exercise-induced ischemia. This information along with the individual's medical history has been electronically stored.

From this database we excluded women and those with any of the following: 1) history of an implanted pacemaker, 2) left bundle branch block, 3) unstable symptom, and 4) impaired chronotropic response. After these exclusions, the participant group comprised 1,703 African Americans and 1,445 Caucasians. The study was approved by the institutional review board at each institution, and all subjects gave written informed consent before undergoing ETT.

All demographic, clinical, and medication information was obtained from the individual's computerized medical records just before ETT. Each individual was asked to verify the computerized information, including history of chronic disease, current medications, and smoking habits. Body weight and height were assessed by a standardized scale and recorded before the test. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Demographic data are included in Table 1.

Dates of death were verified from the Veterans Affairs Beneficiary Identification and Record Locator System File. This system is used to determine benefits to survivors of veterans, and it has been shown to be complete and accurate (95%) (16). Vital status was determined as of 28 February 2008.

Exercise testing was performed using the Bruce protocol at the VAMC in Washington, DC, and by an individualized ramp protocol as described elsewhere (17) at the VAMC in Palo Alto, California. Peak exercise capacity (METs) was estimated using standardized equations based on peak speed and grade for the ramp protocol (17) and on peak exercise time for the Bruce protocol (18). Subjects were encouraged to exercise until volitional fatigue in the absence of symptoms or other indications for stopping (19). The use of handrails was discouraged but allowed when necessary for balance and safety. Age-predicted peak exercise heart rate was determined on the basis of a population-specific equation (20). Medications were not altered before testing.

Three fitness categories were established on the basis of the MET level achieved. Those who achieved a peak MET level ?5 METs (lowest 25%) of the METs achieved by the cohort comprised the low fitness category (low-fit; n = 934); those whose MET level was >75% (?8 METs) comprised the highest fitness category (high-fit; n = 762). Those remaining (5.1?7.9 MET level) comprised the moderate fitness category (moderate-fit; n = 1,452).

Statistical analysis

Follow-up time is presented as mean ? SD and median of years. Mortality rate was calculated as the ratio of events by the number of persons or by the person-years of observation. Continuous variables are presented as mean values ? SD and categorical variables as relative frequencies (percentage). Associations between categorical variables were tested using ?2 analysis. One-way ANOVA was applied to determine age and BMI differences between races and fitness categories. Because of racial differences in age, ANCOVA was used to assess whether racial difference existed in exercise test variables, using age as a covariate. Age and BMI were used as covariates when comparisons among fitness categories were made. Post hoc procedures were performed (Bonferroni) for multiple comparisons. Equality of variances between groups was tested by Levene's test.

The relative risk for mortality was calculated for each fitness category. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for the three fitness categories. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the variables that were significantly associated with mortality among fitness categories. The analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, history of CVD, cardiovascular medications (ACE inhibitors, ?-blockers, calcium channel blocker, diuretics, and statins) and risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking). Racial differences regarding the effect of exercise capacity on mortality risk were tested using a dummy variable that combined the exercise data with race. P < 0.05 using two-sided tests was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 15.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL).


RESULTS

The mean ? SD follow-up period was 7.3 ? 5 years (median 6.4) and 23,137 person-years. There were 823 deaths (26.1%), resulting in an average annual mortality of 3.56%. Of those who died, 509 (29.9%) were African Americans and 314 (21.7%) were Caucasians.

Approximately 79% of subjects achieved a peak heart rate of ?85% of the age-predicted value. Approximately 44% of those who did not achieve this level were receiving ?-blockers.

Participants' characteristics and exercise data are presented in Table 1. African Americans were younger than Caucasians (P < 0.001). After controlling for age, African Americans had higher resting diastolic blood pressure and were more likely to have CVD, hypertension, and dyslipidemia and to be treated with diuretics and insulin. Caucasians were more likely to smoke, have a family history of coronary heart disease, and be treated with ?-blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, and oral glycemic agents. After adjustment for age and resting diastolic blood pressure, the peak exercise systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were significantly higher in African Americans versus Caucasians, whereas peak MET level was higher in Caucasians.

Adjusted mortality for age, CVD, risk factors, resting diastolic blood pressure, cardiovascular medication, insulin and oral glycemic agents, and METs revealed that all-cause mortality was 23% higher (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23 [95% CI [1.02?1.47]; P = 0.02) in African Americans than in Caucasians. This relationship was consistent within moderate-fit (1.31 [1.04?1.64]) and high-fit categories (2.31 [1.44?3.70]) with no significant racial differences in mortality rates within the low-fit category (1.16 [0.94?1.44]).

African Americans who died were significantly older (64 ? 10 vs. 59 ? 9 years; P < 0.001) and had higher resting systolic blood pressure (143 ? 23 vs. 133 ? 21 mmHg; P < 0.001) compared with those still alive. They also had lower BMI (28.7 ? 5.4 vs. 30.7 ? 5.5; P < 0.001) and were more likely to smoke and have a higher prevalence of CVD.

Similarly, Caucasians who died were older (66 ? 9 vs. 61 ? 9 years; P < 0.001) and had higher resting systolic blood pressure (139 ? 23 vs. 133 ? 20 mmHg; P < 0.001) than those alive. In addition, they had significantly lower BMI (28.4 ? 4.8 vs. 30.9 ? 5.8; P < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (77 ? 12 vs. 79 ? 11 mmHg; P < 0.001) and were more likely to have CVD.

Comparisons among fitness categories revealed that age was significantly lower (P < 0.001) for the high-fit versus moderate-fit and low-fit categories (56 ? 9.2, 61 ? 10, and 65 ? 9 years, respectively). Similar findings were observed for both races. BMI was lower (P < 0.05) in the high-fit compared with the moderate-fit and low-fit categories (30.3 ? 5.9 vs. 30.6 ? 5.6 vs. 29.5 ? 5.1 for low-, moderate-, and high-fit, respectively). Thus, age and BMI were used as covariates when differences in resting and exercise heart rate, blood pressure, and MET levels among the fitness categories were assessed.

Exercise capacity and other clinical predictors of total mortality for the entire group and for each race are presented in Table 2. Survival analysis revealed a 16% reduction in mortality risk for every 1-MET increase in exercise capacity in the entire cohort (P < 0.001), 14% in African Americans (P < 0.001), and 19% in Caucasians (P < 0.001).

There were 394 (42.2%) deaths in the low-fit, 339 (23.3%) in the moderate-fit, and 90 (11.8%) in the high-fit category (Fig. 1). Among African Americans, there were 230 (46.4%) deaths in the low-fit, 224 (26.7%) in the moderate-fit, and 55 (14.9%) in the high-fit category. In Caucasians, there were 164 (37.4%) deaths in the low-fit category, 115 (18.8%) in the moderate-fit, and 35 (8.9%) in the high-fit category.

To assess total mortality risk associated with exercise capacity, we compared the moderate- and high-fit categories with the low-fit (Cox proportional hazard) category. The adjusted relative risks of these comparisons are presented in Table 3. The risk of mortality was 37% lower for those with an exercise capacity between 5.1 and 7.9 METs (P < 0.001) and 67% lower for those who achieved ?8 METs (P < 0.001). The findings did not change substantially when participants who died within the first year of follow-up were excluded.

To assess racial differences in mortality risk, we probed for interaction between race and fitness. A significant interaction was noted between race and METs (P < 0.001) and among race and fitness categories (P < 0.001). Thus, we examined mortality rates among fitness categories for each race (Table 3). The low-fit category was used as the referent.

In African Americans, the relative risk was 34% lower for those achieving 5.1?7.9 METs (P < 0.001) and 46% lower for those achieving ?8 METs (P < 0.001). In Caucasians, the relative risk was 43% lower (P < 0.001) for those achieving 5.1?7.9 METs and 67% lower (P < 0.001) for those achieving ?8 METs.

Finally, we addressed the effects of exercise capacity on mortality risk when expressed as a percentage of age-predicted values, calculated on the basis of an equation derived from a large cohort of veterans referred for exercise testing (2). These analyses resulted in no significant differences relative to the findings when exercise capacity was expressed as an absolute value.


CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the current study support a strong inverse and graded association between exercise capacity and risk for all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older African American and Caucasian male Veterans with type 2 diabetes. After adjustment for age, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiac medications, total mortality risk was progressively lower as exercise capacity increased beyond 5 METs (Table 3). Our findings support previous reports of an inverse relationship between aerobic fitness and total mortality in both healthy and diseased populations (1, B2, B3, B4?5). They also confirm a previous report in predominantly male Caucasian diabetic subjects that the largest proportional reduction in risk occurs between the least fit and the moderate fit categories (4).

The current study is unique because it is the first to provide information on the association between exercise capacity and mortality risk in African American men with type 2 diabetes and to compare these relationships with those in a similar group of Caucasians. In this regard, it is important to emphasize that a strong, inverse, and dose-response reduction in the mortality risk for both African Americans and Caucasians was observed. Equally important is the finding of racial disparities in this relationship. More specifically, we noted that the exercise-related reduction in mortality may be stronger and more graded for Caucasians than for African Americans. For example, the adjusted mortality risk reduction per each 1-MET increase in exercise capacity was significantly greater for Caucasians (19%) than for African Americans (14%). Furthermore, comparisons between fitness categories revealed significant and clinically relevant differences in the mortality risk reduction between races. Compared with those in the low-fit category (?5 METs), the mortality risk reduction for those achieving 5.1?7.9 METs was 43% for Caucasians and 34% for African Americans. In the high-fit category (?8 METs), the risk was lowered by 67% (an additional 24% reduction) in Caucasians and only by 46% (an additional 12% reduction) in African Americans (Table 3).

It is noteworthy that in our previous work in >15,600 veterans with multiple risk factors (1), a close scrutiny of the database revealed that racial disparities were evident only in diabetic subjects. The mechanism(s) responsible for the racial disparity in the association of exercise capacity and mortality risk in diabetic men are not readily evident and are beyond the scope of this study. Nevertheless, because obesity has been identified as a risk factor for impaired exercise capacity (21) and is more common among African Americans (22), we examined possible racial differences in the prevalence of obesity as one likely explanation. However, the prevalences of overweight for both African Americans and Caucasians were 49.8 and 49.0% versus 50.7% for obese, respectively (P = 0.35). We also noted no significant racial differences in waist circumference in 182 diabetic subjects with available waist circumference data (P = 0.116).

Another possible mechanism may be racial differences in vascular reactivity. Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is significantly impaired in healthy African American adults (23) and diabetic subjects (24) compared with that in the corresponding groups of Caucasians. In the current study, impaired vascular reactivity may have been more prevalent or more severe in African Americans than in Caucasians.

It is also possible that the racial differences on the impact of exercise capacity on mortality risk may be due to racial differences on adherence to medical therapy or socioeconomic factors that we were not able to account for in this study. We also probed for racial differences between the two sites regarding fitness but found no interactions. Finally, genetic differences between the two races cannot be discounted.

Another notable aspect of our study relates to the socioeconomic strata of our cohort. Most information on the association between exercise capacity and total mortality in diabetic subjects has been derived from predominantly middle to upper socioeconomic status Caucasians (3, B4?5). Socioeconomic factors for such individuals may be more favorable and allow for a more optimal management of their diabetes. Thus, the reported benefits of exercise in such populations may be exaggerated compared with that in individuals in relatively low socioeconomic strata. Our cohort consists of Caucasian and African American veterans who mostly represent relatively lower socioeconomic strata. Thus, our findings support the notion that higher exercise capacity is associated with lower all-cause mortality in men with type 2 diabetes, independent of socioeconomic status.

Finally, the equal access to high-quality health care provided by the Veterans Health Administration in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, independent of a patient's financial status, strengthens the contention that increased exercise capacity provides protection against premature mortality in diabetic men.

Our study has some limitations. The inverse association between cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality does not prove cause and effect relationships. Although similar reciprocal relationships have been demonstrated between fitness and CVD mortality, we only had information on all-cause mortality and did not have data on cardiovascular mortality. However, using all-cause mortality as an end point in clinical investigations is viewed as objective, unbiased, and accurate, whereas use of cardiovascular mortality has been criticized as highly inaccurate (25). The onset of diabetes and other chronic diseases, severity and duration of therapy, and status of physical activity could not be evaluated because of incomplete records. This problem may explain part of the racial disparity noted. Finally, our findings are based on men only and cannot be extrapolated to women.

In summary, our findings support the concept that exercise capacity is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality in African American and Caucasian men with type 2 diabetes. The reduction is graded and more pronounced in Caucasians than in African Americans. It is important to emphasize that the inherent limitations of any epidemiological study do not permit definitive statements and that the finding regarding racial differences should be confirmed by future studies. Despite these limitations, our findings raise the intriguing possibility that racial differences in fitness-related health benefits may exist and that research on racial disparities should be pursued.

Our findings extend the public health message regarding the health benefits of cardiorespiratory fitness to men with diabetes and support the concept that exercise capacity should be given as much attention by clinicians as other major risk factors and that health care professionals should encourage diabetic subjects to initiate and maintain a physically active lifestyle consisting of moderate-intensity activities.


Notes

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked ?advertisement? in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

We acknowledge Monica Aiken, MA, and Chris McManus, MS, for their invaluable work over the years in data collection, management, and retrieval.


REFERENCES
1. Kokkinos, P. Myers, J. Kokkinos, JP. Pittaras, A. Narayan, P. Manolis, A. Karasik, P. Greenberg, M. Papademetriou, V. Singh, S. : Exercise capacity and mortality in black and white men. Circulation 117: 614? 622, 2008 [pmid: 18212278]
2. Myers, J. Prakash, M. Froelicher, V. Do, D. Partington, S. Atwood, JE. : Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 346: 793? 801, 2002 [pmid: 11893790]
3. Church, TS. Cheng, YJ. Earnest, CP. Barlow, CE. Gibbons, LW. Priest, EL. Blair, SN. : Exercise capacity and body composition as predictors of mortality among men with diabetes. Diabetes Care 27: 83? 88, 2004 [pmid: 14693971]
4. Church, TS. LaMonte, MJ. Barlow, CE. Blair, SN. : Cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index as predictors of cardiovascular disease mortality among men with diabetes. Arch Intern Med 165: 2114? 2120, 2005 [pmid: 16217001]
5. Wei, M. Gibbons, LW. Kampert, JB. Nichaman, MZ. Blair, SN. : Low cardiorespiratory fitness and physical inactivity as predictors of mortality in men with type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 132: 605? 611, 2000 [pmid: 10766678]
6. Knowler, WC. Barrett-Connor, E. Fowler, SE. Hamman, RF. Lachin, JM. Walker, EA. Nathan, DM. : Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346: 393? 403, 2002 [pmid: 11832527]
7. McAuley, PA. Myers, JN. Abella, JP. Tan, SY. Froelicher, VF. : Exercise capacity and body mass as predictors of mortality among male veterans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 30: 1539? 1543, 2007 [pmid: 17351282]
8. Ness, J. Nassimiha, D. Feria, MI. Aronow, WS. : Diabetes in older African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites in an academic hospital-based geriatrics practice. Coronary Artery Dis 10: 343? 346, 1999
9. National Center for Health Statistics: Health, United States, 2006 With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans [Internet], 2006. Hyattsville, MD, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics.
Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus06.pdfAccessed 24 November 2008
10. Young, BA. Maynard, C. Boyko, EJ. : Racial differences in diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in a national population of veterans. Diabetes Care 26: 2392? 2399, 2003 [pmid: 12882868]
11. Gornick, ME. Eggers, PW. Reilly, TW. Mentnech, RM. Fitterman, LK. Kucken, LE. Vladeck, BC. : Effects of race and income on mortality and use of services among Medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med 335: 791? 799, 1996 [pmid: 8703185]
12. Schneider, EC. Zaslavsky, AM. Epstein, AM. : Racial disparities in the quality of care for enrollees in medicare managed care. JAMA 287: 1288? 1294, 2002 [pmid: 11886320]
13. Estacio, RO. Wolfel, EE. Regensteiner, JG. Jeffers, B. Havranek, EP. Savage, S. Schrier, RW. : Effect of risk factors on exercise capacity in NIDDM. Diabetes 45: 79? 85, 1996 [pmid: 8522064]
14. Kizer, KW. Demakis, JG. Feussner, JR. : Reinventing VA health care: systematizing quality improvement and quality innovation. Med Care 386 ( Suppl. 1): I7? I16, 2000 [pmid: 10843266]
15. Selim, AJ. Berlowitz, DR. Fincke, G. Rosen, AK. Ren, XS. Christiansen, CL. Cong, Z. Lee, A. Kazis, L. : Risk-adjusted mortality rates as a potential outcome indicator for outpatient quality assessments. Med Care 40: 237? 245, 2002 [pmid: 11880796]
16. Boyle, CA. Decoufle, P. : National sources of vital status information: extent of coverage and possible selectivity in reporting. Am J Epidemiol 131: 160? 168, 1990 [pmid: 2403466]
17. Myers, J. Buchanan, N. Walsh, D. Kraemer, M. McAuley, P. Hamilton-Wessler, M. Froelicher, VF. : Comparison of the ramp versus standard exercise protocols. J Am Coll Cardiol 17: 1334? 1342, 1991 [pmid: 2016451]
18. American College of Sports Medicine: ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription6th ed.Baltimore, MD, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000
19. Gibbons, RJ. Balady, GJ. Bricker, JT. Chaitman, BR. Fletcher, GF. Froelicher, VF. Mark, DB. McCallister, BD. Mooss, AN. O'Reilly, MG. Winters, WL. Gibbons, RJ. Antman, EM. Alpert, JS. Faxon, DP. Fuster, V. Gregoratos, G. Hiratzka, LF. Jacobs, AK. Russell, RO. Smith, SC. : American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 106: 1883? 1892, 2002 [pmid: 12356646]
20. Morris, CK. Myers, J. Froelicher, VF. Kawaguchi, T. Ueshima, K. Hideg, A. : Nomogram based on metabolic equivalents and age for assessing aerobic exercise capacity in men. J Am Coll Cardiol 22: 175? 182, 1993 [pmid: 8509539]
21. Ribisl, PM. Lang, W. Jaramillo, SA. Jakicic, JM. Stewart, KJ. Bahnson, J. Bright, R. Curtis, JF. Crow, RS. Soberman, JE. : Look AHEAD Research Group: Exercise capacity and cardiovascular/metabolic characteristics of overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes: the Look AHEAD clinical trial. Diabetes Care 30: 2679? 2684, 2007 [pmid: 17644623]
22. Cossrow, N. Falkner, B. : Race/ethnic issues in obesity and obesity-related co-morbidities. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 2590? 2594, 2004 [pmid: 15181028]
23. Perregaux, D. Chaudhuri, A. Rao, S. Airen, A. Wilson, M. Sung, BH. Dandona, P. : Brachial vascular reactivity in blacks. Hypertension 36: 866? 871, 2000 [pmid: 11082158]
24. Jawa, A. Nachimuthu, S. Pendergrass, M. Asnani, S. Fonseca, V. : Impaired vascular reactivity in African-American patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria or proteinuria despite angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 31? 35, 2006 [pmid: 16219712]
25. Lauer, MS. Blackstone, EH. Young, JB. Topol, EJ. : Cause of death in clinical research: time for a reassessment?J Am Coll Cardiol 34: 618? 620, 1999 [pmid: 10483939]

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Cumulative survival for the entire cohort according to fitness categories.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Demographic and clinical characteristics for African Americans and Caucasians with type 2 diabetes


Total African American Caucasian P*
n 3,148 1,703 1,445 ?
Age (years) 61 ? 10 60 ? 10 62 ? 10 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 30 ? 5.6 30 ? 5.5 30 ? 5.7 0.27
Resting heart rate (beats/min) 76 ? 14 76 ? 14 76 ? 14 0.82
Resting systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 135 ? 21 136 ? 22 134 ? 21 0.1
Resting diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 80 ? 12 81 ? 12 78 ? 12 <0.001
CVD (%) 49.7 51.7 47.3 <0.001
Smoking (%) 42 35.1 50.2 <0.001
Hypertension (%) 73.6 75.6 71.3 0.007
Family history of coronary heart disease 14.8 12.3 18.8 <0.001
Dyslipidemia (%) 26.9 34.6 17.9 <0.001
?-Blockers (%) 18.3 13.1 24.4 <0.001
Calcium channel blockers (%) 21.4 20.6 22.4 0.23
ACE inhibitors (%) 37.5 34.6 40.9 <0.001
Diuretics (%) 15.7 18.6 12.3 <0.001
Aspirin (%) 5.9 5.9 5.8 0.511
Statins (%) 14.6 9.4 20.7 <0.001
Insulin (%) 30.7 33.7 22.8 <0.001
Oral glycemic agents (%) 34.2 33.2 36.8 0.13
Exercise data*
????Peak heart rate (beats/min) 135 ? 25 138 ? 25 131 ? 25 <0.001
????Peak systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 183 ? 32 188 ? 33 176 ? 31 <0.001
????Peak diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 86 ? 16 89 ? 16 82 ? 15 <0.001
????Peak METs (3.5 ml O2 ? kg?1 ? min?1) 6.4 ? 2.3 6.3 ? 2.0 6.5 ? 2.6 0.001

Data are means ? SD.

TF1-1*P values represent comparisons between African Americans and Caucasians.


[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality according to exercise capacity


HR (95% CI) P
All (n = 3,148)
????Peak exercise capacity (for each 1-MET increment) 0.79 (0.76?0.82) <0.001
????Adjusted for age and BMI 0.82 (0.79?0.86) <0.001
????Adjusted for age, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors, CVD, and cardiovascular medications 0.84 (0.81?0.87) <0.001
African Americans (n = 1,703)
????Peak exercise capacity (for each 1-MET increment) 0.80 (0.76?0.84) <0.001
????Adjusted for age and BMI 0.85 (0.93?0.96) <0.001
????Adjusted age, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors, CVD, and cardiovascular medications? 0.86 (0.82?0.90) <0.001
Caucasians (n = 1,445)
Peak exercise capacity (for each 1-MET increment) 0.77 (0.73?0.82) <0.001
????Adjusted for age and BMI 0.81 (0.76?0.85) <0.001
????Adjusted age, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors, CVD, and cardiovascular medications? 0.81 (0.77?0.86) <0.001

*Cardiovascular risk factors include hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking.

TF2-1?Cardiovascular medications include ACE inhibitors, ?-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, insulin, aspirin, and statins.


[TableWrap ID: T3] Table 3 

Relative risk for all-cause mortality according to fitness categories


Low fit Moderate fit High fit P*
MET level achieved ?5 METs 5.1?7.9 METs ?8 METs
Entire cohort (n = 3,148)
????Age-adjusted Referent 0.62 (0.53?0.71) 0.41 (0.32?0.52) <0.001
????Multi-adjusted? Referent 0.63 (0.55?0.73) 0.41 (0.33?0.53) <0.001
????Excluding deaths that occurred during the first year of follow-up Referent 0.63 (0.53?0.73) 0.43 (0.14?0.55) <0.001
African-Americans (n = 1,703)
????Age-adjusted Referent 0.65 (0.54?0.78) 0.54 (0.39?0.73) <0.001
????Multi-adjusted? Referent 0.66 (0.55?0.80) 0.54 (0.39?0.73) <0.001
????Excluding deaths that occurred during the first year of follow-up Referent 0.65 (0.53?0.79) 0.56 (0.40?0.77) <0.001
Caucasians (n = 1,445)
????Age-adjusted Referent 0.55 (0.43?0.70) 0.32 (0.22?0.47) <0.001
????Multi-adjusted? Referent 0.57 (0.44?0.73) 0.33 (0.22?0.48) <0.001
????Excluding deaths that occurred during the first year of follow-up Referent 0.57 (0.43?0.72) 0.34 (0.23?0.51) <0.001

Data are HRs (95% CI).

TF3-1*P values are for both the moderate-fit and high-fit categories compared with the low-fit category (referent) and for linear trend.

TF3-2?Adjusted for age, BMI, ACE inhibitors, ?-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, statins, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking.



Article Categories:
  • Original Research
    • Epidemiology/Health Services Research


Previous Document:  Explaining the adjustment of adolescents with type 1 diabetes: role of diabetes-specific and psychos...
Next Document:  Impaired distal thermoregulation in diabetes and diabetic polyneuropathy.