Document Detail


Examining the role of positive and negative affect in recovery from spine surgery.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22119337     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Consistent evidence supports a significant association between lower positive affect and higher negative affect and increased pain and disability in adults with chronic pain. However, examining this relation in surgical populations has received little empirical consideration. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative and postoperative positive and negative affect predict pain, disability, and functional status after spine surgery. A secondary objective was to assess the relation of depression to postoperative outcomes compared with positive and negative affect. Participants were 141 patients treated by spine surgery for lumbar or cervical degeneration. Data collection occurred at baseline and 6weeks and 3months postoperatively. Affect was measured with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Multivariable mixed-model linear regression analyses found that preoperative variables were not predictive of postoperative pain, disability and functional status. However, multivariable postoperative analysis found that 6-week positive affect predicted functional status, and 6-week negative affect predicted pain interference and pain-related disability at 3months following surgery. Postoperative depression demonstrated statistically significant and stronger associations with pain intensity, pain interference, and pain-related disability at 3-month follow-up, as compared with negative affect. Results suggest that positive affect and depression are important variables to target when seeking to improve postoperative outcomes in a spine surgery population. Recommendations include postoperative screening for positive affect and depression, and treating depression as well as focusing on rehabilitation strategies to bolster positive affect so as to improve functional outcomes after spine surgery.
Authors:
Caryn L Seebach; Matthew Kirkhart; Jeffrey M Lating; Stephen T Wegener; Yanna Song; Lee H Riley; Kristin R Archer
Related Documents :
21797747 - Robotic cardiac surgery: advanced minimally invasive technology hindered by barriers to...
16543257 - Should fertilization treatment start with reducing stress?
22246997 - The role of recalibration response shift in explaining bodily pain in cancer patients u...
18414267 - Causes and management of indwelling urinary catheter-related pain.
15502687 - Exaggerated pain behavior: by what standard?
24141047 - Do sex hormones influence emotional modulation of pain and nociception in healthy women?
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-11-24
Journal Detail:
Title:  Pain     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1872-6623     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7508686     Medline TA:  Pain     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Plasma retinol: A novel marker for cardiovascular disease mortality in Australian adults.
Next Document:  Effects of spatially targeted transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation using an electrode array t...