Document Detail

Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11226105     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
IMPLICATIONS: The quality of systematic reviews relating to perioperative medicine was examined systematically and found to be similar in quality to those in other specialties. Adoption of recently published criteria on writing and methods could further improve this type of literature.
P T Choi; S H Halpern; N Malik; A R Jadad; M R Tramèr; B Walder
Related Documents :
16716845 - Acupuncture treatment for opiate addiction: a systematic review.
9571725 - The role of inhalation rewarming in the early management of hypothermia.
19445775 - Haemorrhoids.
17716415 - Are the best available clinical effectiveness data used in economic evaluations of drug...
10406265 - Pseudo sister mary joseph's nodule.
8869365 - Biliary lithiasis: retrospective analysis of a case series.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Anesthesia and analgesia     Volume:  92     ISSN:  0003-2999     ISO Abbreviation:  Anesth. Analg.     Publication Date:  2001 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-03-06     Completed Date:  2001-03-22     Revised Date:  2013-05-20    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1310650     Medline TA:  Anesth Analg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  700-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Anaesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Databases as Topic
Review Literature as Topic*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Cost identification analysis for succinylcholine.
Next Document:  The effects of lactated Ringer's solution infusion on cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia...