| Evidence and the end of medicine. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21298403 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Fifty years ago, in 1961, Feinstein published his first path-breaking articles leading to his seminal work Clinical Judgement and to the establishment of clinical epidemiology. Feinstein had an Aristotelian approach to scientific method: methods must be adapted to the material examined. Feinstein died 10 years ago and few years before his death he concluded that efforts to promote a person-oriented medicine had failed. He criticised medicine for not having recognized that only persons can suitably observe, evaluate and rate their own health status. Feinstein's position was-as in Clinical Judgement-methodological. He didn't espouse ethical principles. He pointed to methodological deficiencies in clinical epidemiology and evidence-based medicine. In this article we'll provide a framework for understanding and justifying Feinstein's call for a person-oriented medicine which recognizes patients as co-actors in clinical reasoning. It's argued that craftsmanship and practical wisdom are integrated in clinical judgement and reasoning and that clinical reasoning is not only about means to achieve the end, health. We do also reason and deliberate about ends. The 'defining end' of medicine (health) has continuously been negotiated and so been the object of deliberation. For centuries among professionals, in recent years among professionals and patients. These negotiations and deliberations lead to ongoing specifications of health as a 'guiding end', i.e. an end guiding clinical reasoning about what to do in particular situations. Feinstein's self-critical account to clinical epidemiology at the end of his professional career reflects the fact that patients during the last 30-40 years (i.e. in the period after the publication of Clinical Judgement) widely have been recognized as persons with rights to autonomy. Feinstein's lesson is, however, that espousing and recognizing ethical ideals is not enough. A change of clinical practice and its methods is necessary. His critique also implies that clinical epidemiology and evidence-based medicine as practiced haven't provided such a turn. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Keld Thorgaard; Uffe Juul Jensen |
Related Documents
:
|
14965433 - Taking the path less traveled: the nontraditional doctorate. 12974843 - Why do doctors attend traditional cme events if they don't change what they do in their... 21595383 - The ten commandments of recruiting: best practices for hiring the best employees. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2011-2-5 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Medicine, health care, and philosophy Volume: - ISSN: 1572-8633 ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2011 Feb |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-2-7 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9815900 Medline TA: Med Health Care Philos Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Affiliation:
|
Health, Humanity and Culture, Institute of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Nobelparken, Bygn 1467, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark, filkt@hum.au.dk. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Trace metals and radionuclides in macroalgae from Moroccan coastal waters.
Next Document: Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a flu...