Document Detail


Evidence - competence - discourse: the theoretical framework of the multi-centre clinical ethics support project metap.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21790694     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In this paper we assume that 'theory' is important for Clinical Ethics Support Services (CESS). We will argue that the underlying implicit theory should be reflected. Moreover, we suggest that the theoretical components on which any clinical ethics support (CES) relies should be explicitly articulated in order to enhance the quality of CES. A theoretical framework appropriate for CES will be necessarily complex and should include ethical (both descriptive and normative), metaethical and organizational components. The various forms of CES that exist in North-America and in Europe show their underlying theory more or less explicitly, with most of them referring to some kind of theoretical components including 'how-to' questions (methodology), organizational issues (implementation), problem analysis (phenomenology or typology of problems), and related ethical issues such as end-of-life decisions (major ethical topics). In order to illustrate and explain the theoretical framework that we are suggesting for our own CES project METAP, we will outline this project which has been established in a multi-centre context in several healthcare institutions. We conceptualize three 'pillars' as the major components of our theoretical framework: (1) evidence, (2) competence, and (3) discourse. As a whole, the framework is aimed at developing a foundation of our CES project METAP. We conclude that this specific integration of theoretical components is a promising model for the fruitful further development of CES.
Authors:
Stella Reiter-Theil; Marcel Mertz; Jan Schürmann; Nicola Stingelin Giles; Barbara Meyer-Zehnder
Related Documents :
17821174 - Measuring the societal benefits of innovation.
6276464 - Microbiological studies on hamburgers.
10761144 - Coverage of indian leather patents in chemical abstracts
14122444 - Studies on malaria and anopheles balabacensis in cambodia.
17821174 - Measuring the societal benefits of innovation.
11369264 - The first basmajian lecture. reflections on john v. basmajian: anatomist, electromyogra...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Bioethics     Volume:  25     ISSN:  1467-8519     ISO Abbreviation:  Bioethics     Publication Date:  2011 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-07-27     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8704792     Medline TA:  Bioethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  403-12     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Affiliation:
Department of Medical and Health Ethics and the Clinical Ethics Support project METAP at the Medical Faculty/University Hospital Basel, Switzerland University of Mannheim, also working as a researcher at Hannover Medical School Department of Medical and Health Ethics.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Mapping out structural features in clinical care calling for ethical sensitivity: a theoretical appr...
Next Document:  Responsibility after the apparent end: 'following-up' in clinical ethics consultation.