Document Detail


Evaluation of the technique used by health-care workers for taking blood pressure.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  7498997     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The precise guidelines recommended by the American Heart Association for blood pressure measurement are commonly overlooked by health-care workers, who generally take blood pressure in an arbitrary way. To validate this observation we designed a descriptive and observational study to be carried out in a major hospital. One hundred and seventy-two health-care workers divided into four groups (63 general practitioners, 25 clinical and 25 surgical specialists, and 59 nurses) were evaluated in a two-part test. In the first part (practical), the examinee had to follow all the steps recommended by the American Heart Association to get a passing score. In the second part (theoretical, which came second to avoid influencing the practical), the examinee had to answer correctly 7 of 10 questions based on the American Heart Association's guidelines to obtain a passing score. The highest accepted variation in systolic and diastolic pressures between examinee and observer was +/- 4 mm Hg. None of the examinees followed the American Heart Association's recommendations. Sixty-three percent of systolic and 53% of diastolic readings were out of range. Surgical specialists obtained the best practical results (48% systolic and 64% diastolic within range), and nurses obtained the lowest values (29% and 39%, respectively; P = .03 versus surgical specialists). These two groups showed deficiencies in the theoretical test (nurses, 10% correct answers and surgical specialists, 16%). Clinical specialists obtained the best results on the theoretical test (60% correct; P < .05 versus the other groups) but were deficient in the practical test (32% systolic and 60% diastolic within range).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Authors:
I Villegas; I C Arias; A Botero; A Escobar
Related Documents :
1639997 - Ethnicity and ambulatory blood pressure measurement: relationship to clinic and laborat...
11967237 - Impaired stress-induced pressure natriuresis is related to left ventricle structure in ...
19571827 - Masked, white coat and sustained hypertension: comparison of target organ damage and ps...
7089157 - Habitual anger-coping styles: i. effect on mean blood pressure and risk for essential h...
2904747 - Control of coronary heart disease risk factors with doxazosin as monotherapy and in com...
19915497 - Effects of successive air and trimix dives on human cardiovascular function.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Hypertension     Volume:  26     ISSN:  0194-911X     ISO Abbreviation:  Hypertension     Publication Date:  1995 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-01-16     Completed Date:  1996-01-16     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7906255     Medline TA:  Hypertension     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1204-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Clínica León XIII, Instituto de Seguros Sociales (I.V.), Colombia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
American Heart Association
Blood Pressure Determination / methods*,  standards
Clinical Medicine
Data Collection
Evaluation Studies as Topic
General Surgery
Humans
Medical Staff, Hospital*
Nurses*
Physicians, Family
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Blood pressure influences the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmia in hemodialysis patients.
Next Document:  Malignant hypertension is accompanied by marked alterations in chylomicron metabolism.