|Evaluation of patients' experiences with antidepressants reported by means of a medicine reporting system.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 17874086 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|OBJECTIVE: To assess experiences related to antidepressant use reported to an internet-based medicine reporting system and to compare the nature of the side effects reported by patients with those reported by health care professionals (HCPs).
METHODS: All reports submitted from May 2004 to May 2005 to an internet-based medicine reporting system in The Netherlands related to the use of antidepressants were analysed. Spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions on antidepressants from HCPs received by The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb from May 2004 to May 2005 were included for comparison.
RESULTS: Of the 2232 individuals who submitted a report to the internet-based medicine reporting system, 258 submitted a report on antidepressants. Of these, 92 individuals (36%) reported on effectiveness, 40 (16%) of whom reported on ineffectiveness, and 217 (84%) submitted a report on side effects, with 202 (78%) reporting a total of 630 side effects that were experienced as negative. Fourteen individuals (5%) reported a practical issue and four (2%) reported a reimbursement issue. Of all 630 side effects reported, 48% resulted in the patient discontinuing the antidepressant therapy; of these 29% did not inform their HCP. Of all the side effects reported, 52% were perceived as "very negative". In comparison to the side effects reported by HCPs, patients more often reported apathy, excessive sweating, ineffectiveness, somnolence, insomnia, sexual problems and weight increase.
CONCLUSION: Patients report the ineffectiveness and side effects of antidepressant therapy as negative and leading to discontinuation of the therapy. Patients and HCPs differ in the nature of the reported side effects. Patient experiences should be included in the evaluation of antidepressant treatment in clinical practice.
|E C G van Geffen; S W van der Wal; R van Hulten; M C H de Groot; A C G Egberts; E R Heerdink|
Related Documents :
|16187996 - Ophthalmological adverse effects of (chiropractic) upper spinal manipulation: evidence ...
12828336 - Revised air-exchange efficiency considering occupant distribution in ventilated rooms.
18029526 - Anti-flatulence treatment and status epilepticus: a case of camphor intoxication.
14708896 - Ornidazole-induced liver damage: report of three cases and review of the literature.
2918676 - Congenital syphilis and necrotizing funisitis.
3824146 - Vertebral hemangiomas presenting with neurologic symptoms.
|Type: Evaluation Studies; Journal Article Date: 2007-09-15|
|Title: European journal of clinical pharmacology Volume: 63 ISSN: 0031-6970 ISO Abbreviation: Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Publication Date: 2007 Dec|
|Created Date: 2007-11-09 Completed Date: 2008-04-25 Revised Date: 2013-06-06|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 1256165 Medline TA: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Country: Germany|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 1193-9 Citation Subset: IM|
|Science Shop for Medicines, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems / statistics & numerical data*
Antidepressive Agents / adverse effects*, classification
Treatment Refusal / statistics & numerical data
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Eur J Clin Pharmacol
Publisher: Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg
? Springer-Verlag 2007
Received Day: 27 Month: 4 Year: 2007
Accepted Day: 23 Month: 8 Year: 2007
Electronic publication date: Day: 15 Month: 9 Year: 2007
Print publication date: Month: 12 Year: 2007
Volume: 63 Issue: 12
First Page: 1193 Last Page: 1199
PubMed Id: 17874086
Publisher Id: 375
issue-copyright-statement: ? Springer-Verlag 2007
|Evaluation of patients? experiences with antidepressants reported by means of a medicine reporting system|
|E. C. G. van Geffen1|
|S. W. van der Wal1|
|R. van Hulten2|
|M. C. H. de Groot3|
|A. C. G. Egberts2|
|E. R. Heerdink2||
1Science Shop for Medicines, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands
3Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH ?s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
Non-adherence to prescribed medication regimens is a persistent problem in the treatment of depression with antidepressants. Premature discontinuation, dosing lapses and partial non-adherence often occur [1?3]. The illness itself as well as physician-, patient- and treatment-related factors have been suggested to contribute to antidepressant non-adherence, but the ability of health care professionals (HCP) to predict who discontinues medication remains poor [4?6]. Earlier studies provide scant information on how patients in clinical practice perceive their treatment with antidepressants, thus insight and an understanding of the patients? perspectives on non-adherence and discontinuation are limited. Side effects and ineffectiveness are the major reasons cited for the discontinuation of antidepressant therapy [7, 8]. However, the information available on side effects is mostly based on controlled clinical trials, which standardly do not evaluate how bothersome side effects are to the individual patient. Moreover, both the side effects and the effectiveness of the antidepressant therapy observed in clinical trials may not reflect the experiences of the patients in real world settings. Many interventions have been developed to improve adherence to antidepressants, but to date these have failed to demonstrate a clear benefit [9, 10]. Treatment non-adherence remains one of the least understood health-related behaviours. Information received directly from the patient may improve our understanding of the relative importance of antidepressant treatment issues and, consequently, help to explain patients? behaviour towards antidepressant use.
Reporting systems have shown to be a useful tool in collecting experiences and identifying issues related to the daily use of medicines . In 2004, an internet-based medicine reporting system was established in The Netherlands where users of medicines are able to report all types of experiences with medicines ? side effects as well as experiences with effectiveness and practical and reimbursement issues. We extracted data from this medicine reporting system in order to (1) assess the type of experiences related to antidepressant use reported by patients, (2) assess the relevance of these experiences and (3) compare the nature of the suspected side effects reported by patients with those reported by HCPs.
Reports were obtained from an internet-based medicine reporting system launched on 11 May 2004 in The Netherlands. This reporting system was initiated by DGV, The Dutch Institute for the Proper Use of Medicine, the Science Shop for Medicines and patient and consumer organisations. Individuals are able to report their experiences with medicines anonymously by completing a report form downloaded by accessing a website (http://www.meldpuntmedicijnen.nl). Users of the medicine themselves as well as their relatives, acquaintances or (professional) carers, can report an experience. All reports submitted between 11 May 2004 and 13 May 2005 related to the use of antidepressants were reviewed for the clarity and completeness of the description of the experience and checked for multiple reports from the same IP-address. One duplicate report had to be excluded. All other reports were included in the study. The data were stored in an Access database.
The report form contained items which requested information on age, gender, type of medicine used, nature of the experience, a description of the experience and the relevance of the experience. Individuals filling in the report had to indicate whether the experience was related to either effectiveness, a side effect, a practical issue (e.g. difficulties with swallowing tablets) or a reimbursement issue. More than one experience related to the same drug could be submitted. Experiences related to effectiveness had to be further specified by the individual by selecting one of the following categories: ineffectiveness, a positive effect or a different type of effect (e.g. drug interactions). Experiences related to side effects had to be further specified by selecting one of the following categories: negative side effects, positive side effects (e.g. less side effects as compared with previous medication) or the absence of side effects. Relevance of the experience was assessed by asking the individual filling in the report to indicate both the impact of the experience on a 5-point scale (ranging from very negative to very positive) and whether the experience caused a change in antidepressant use. To specify the change in antidepressant use, those reporting had to select one of the following categories: discontinuation, switching to other treatment, adjustment of dosage or administration, any other action taken or no action taken. In the case of discontinuation of the antidepressant, the report also asked whether the HCP has been informed.
All reported side effects (including experiences on ineffectiveness) were coded by one of the authors (SvdW) and checked by a second author (EvG), using preferred terms of the World Health Organisation Adverse Reaction Terminology (WHO-ART) . Preferred terms were combined into groups of similar side effects. Spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions on antidepressants received from HCPs from May 2004 to May 2005 were included for comparison. These reports were received by The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb either on paper forms or electronically via http://www.lareb.nl. Coding and assessment were carried out by qualified assessors from Lareb .
The relevance of the side effects was assessed by comparing the impact of the (grouped) side effects as a proportion of the side effects that were perceived as ?very negative?. Relevance was also assessed by comparing the proportion of the side effects that caused discontinuation of initial antidepressant use, including the categories ?discontinuation? and ?switching to other treatment?. The impact and discontinuation proportions of the different groups of side effects were compared using the chi-square test.
For the comparison between patients and HCPs, the groups of side effects were compared and expressed as an Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The 15 most frequently reported (groups of) side effects by patients as well as the 15 most frequently reported (groups of) side effects by HCPs were included in the analysis.
In total 2232 individuals submitted a report to the medicine reporting system during the study period, of whom 258 (12%) submitted a report on antidepressants. Of these 258 individuals, 248 (96%) reported for themselves and ten reported for a relative or acquaintance.
The mean (?SD) age of the of the antidepressant users was 42.8 (?13.5) years and 72% were female. The majority of those reporting on antidepressants (63%) were reporting on a serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI); 12% were reporting on a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) and 25% on another type of antidepressant. The antidepressants most frequently reported on were paroxetine (35% of total), venlafaxine (15%), citalopram (10%) and mirtazapine (8%). The use of a benzodiazepine as a concomitant drug was reported by 19% of those reporting on antidepressant use.
The 258 individuals reporting on antidepressant use described 327 experiences. Table?1 shows the nature of the experiences described. Ninety-two individuals (36%) described an experience with effectiveness, of whom 40 (16%) described an experience with ineffectiveness. Four individuals claimed generic substitution as the reason for ineffectiveness, and 45 (17%) reported a positive experience with the effectiveness of an antidepressant. ?Other type of effects? in terms of effectiveness that were submitted by seven (3%) individuals included experiences on suspected drug interactions.
In total, 217 of the 258 individuals (84%) reporting on antidepressant use submitted a report on side effects. Of these, 202 (78%) described a total of 630 side effects that were experienced as negative. The number of reported side effects ranged from 1 to 11 per reporter experiencing a negative side effect. Twelve individuals (5%) reported that they had not experienced any side effect at all, and three (1%) submitted a positive experience with side effects, reporting that their current antidepressant therapy caused fewer side effects than their previous medication.
Fourteen individuals (5%) reported a practical issue (such as problems with swallowing tablets or bad taste), and four (2%) reported a reimbursement or availability issue (receiving treatment for a relative short duration).
Box?1 shows a number of the reported experiences.
Table?2 shows the relevance, impact and discontinuation rates of the most frequently reported side effects. Of all side effects, 48% resulted in discontinuation of the initial antidepressant therapy. The proportion of side effects that caused discontinuation of the initial antidepressant did not differ significantly between the different side effects. Of those individuals who simultaneously reported an experience on side effects and one on ineffectiveness, 59% (17/29) reported that their experience resulted in discontinuation of the initial antidepressant therapy. Of all individuals who reported discontinuation of therapy, 29% did not inform their HCP.
Of all side effects, 52% were perceived as ?very negative?. The impact of the side effects differed almost significantly between the groups of side effects (p?=?0.052), with headache, dizziness and fainting perceived as most negative.
Table?3 presents those side effects most frequently reported by patients and HCPs. Patients and HCPs differed in the nature of reported side effects. Compared with HCPs, patients reported significantly more events such as apathy, excessive sweating, ineffectiveness, discontinuation symptoms, somnolence, insomnia, sexual problems and weight increase. HCPs reported significantly more rash, pruritis, laboratory abnormalities, muscle and joint complaints, congenital disorders, eye disorders, extrapyramidal disorders and menstrual disorders than patients.
Both side effects and a lack of effectiveness appear to be important treatment issues for patients who reported on antidepressants in our study. Most of the individuals reporting on antidepressant use described one or more side effects, of which the most frequent were weight increase, sexual problems, somnolence, insomnia and apathy. Ineffectiveness was also reported by a considerable number of individuals. Ineffectiveness is not often reported in literature as an adverse effect of treatment . However, our study reveals that it is a relevant issue for patients during antidepressant therapy. The fact that side effects tend to occur before the therapeutic effect of the antidepressant is perceived may play an important part in explaining early discontinuation of the therapy. Ineffectiveness should therefore receive attention from HCPs in order to prevent early discontinuation of antidepressants.
One of the unique features of this medicine reporting system is the possibility to gather information on the relevance of the experiences ? that is the impact of the experience and the change in initial treatment. Overall, half of the experiences were perceived as very negative. Experience of one or more bothersome side effects means an individual is threefold more likely to stop taking antidepressants . Our results show that one half of the side effects resulted in discontinuation of the initial antidepressant therapy. Moreover, of all those individuals who reported discontinuation of therapy, 29% did not even inform their HCP. This supports the concept that this medicine reporting system provides data of which HCPs are often not aware, but which are of crucial importance to any understanding of patients? behaviour related to the use of antidepressants.
Patients and HCPs differed in the nature of the side effects reported. Patients were found to report more frequently those events which may be less tangible and visible to HCPs, such as sleeping problems and apathy. In addition, HCPs may consider symptoms reported by patients with psychiatric disorders as a symptom of the disease rather than as one related to the medication. Other notable differences between patients and HCPs in terms of the frequency of reported side effects were those of weight increase, sexual problems, discontinuation symptoms and excessive sweating. The differences in the nature of the reported side effects show that patients and HCPs differ in which type of side effects can be considered to be bothersome and/or relevant to report. The burden of side effects is clearly underestimated by HCPs . Although HCPs are knowledgeable on the side effects related to SSRI use, they underestimate the frequency of these side effects and how bothersome they are to patients . In addition, HCPs may be reticent in reporting a side effect to a reporting system. More than patients, HCPs evaluate the side effect reported by the patient according to perceived relevance and causality related to the medication. Side effects which are considered by the HCP as well-known or not related to the medication consequently get lost to the health care system .
Patient reporting is not yet widely accepted, and the number of systems collecting experiences from patients is still limited. In the UK, the Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) system seeks to identify adverse events recorded following the use of newly marketed drugs selected for monitoring on the first 20,000?50,000 patients given the new drug . Since the middle of 2003, the Danish Medicines Agency and the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb also accept reports on adverse drug reactions from patients . In Sweden, the KILEN Consumer Institute for Medicines and Health started a consumer database in 1997 that collects experiences related mainly to dependence and side effects of benzodiazepine and antidepressant use . However, these systems focus only on adverse events, while other aspects of medicine use, including experiences on ineffectiveness, practical and reimbursement issues, have also been shown to be relevant to patients.
A limitation of this internet-based reporting system is that the reporters are anonymous and, therefore, further contact and feedback are not possible. Consequently, a thorough assessment of causality between the side effect and the antidepressant was not always possible. The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, on the other hand, whose primary aim is the early detection of new adverse drug reactions, has the facilities to request further medical information by contacting the patient and/or his/her HCP . However, we believe this does not detract from our conclusion. The individuals reporting through the internet-based reporting system proved to be capable of providing clear descriptions of their experiences and of balancing the benefits and burden of treatment. The patient experiences provide important information on how patients in clinical practice perceive treatment with antidepressants. Such patients experience sleep disorders, weight increase, sexual problems, apathy and ineffectiveness as events which have a negative impact and which frequently lead to discontinuation of the antidepressant therapy. Because adherence decisions are mostly a rational balance of perceived benefits versus burden , an assessment of patient experiences may improve the understanding of patients? behaviour towards antidepressant use. This information can be used in the development of more targeted adherence-enhancing strategies that may lead to optimisation of antidepressant treatment from the perspective of both HCPs and patients.
|1..||Lin EHB,Korff M,Katon W,Bush T,Simon ES,Walker E,Robinson P. The role of the primary care physician in patients? adherence to antidepressant therapyMed Care 1995;33:67–74. [doi: 10.1097/00005650-199501000-00006]|
|1..||Lin EHB, Von Korff M, Katon W, Bush T, Simon ES, Walker E, Robinson P (1995) The role of the primary care physician in patients? adherence to antidepressant therapy. Med Care 33:67?74 [pmid: 7823648]|
|2..||Meijer WEE,Bouvy ML,Heerdink ER,Urquhart J,Leufkens HMG. Spontaneous lapses in dosing during chronic treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsBr J Psychiatry 2001;179:519–522. [doi: 10.1192/bjp.179.6.519]|
|2..||Meijer WEE, Bouvy ML, Heerdink ER, Urquhart J, Leufkens HMG (2001) Spontaneous lapses in dosing during chronic treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Br J Psychiatry 179:519?522 [pmid: 11731355]|
|3..||Bambauer KZ,Adams AS,Zhang F,Minkoff N,Grande A,Weisblatt R,Soumerai SB,Ross-Degnan D. Physicians alerts to increase antidepressant adherenceArch Intern Med 2006;166:498–504. [doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.498]|
|3..||Bambauer KZ, Adams AS, Zhang F, Minkoff N, Grande A, Weisblatt R, Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D (2006) Physicians alerts to increase antidepressant adherence. Arch Intern Med 166:498?504 [pmid: 16534035]|
|4..||Cohen N,Parikh SV,Kennedy SH. Medication compliance in mood disorders: relevance of the Healt Belief Model and other determinantsPrim Care Psychiatry 2000;6:101–110. [doi: 10.1185/135525700543307]|
|4..||Cohen N, Parikh SV, Kennedy SH (2000) Medication compliance in mood disorders: relevance of the Healt Belief Model and other determinants. Prim Care Psychiatry 6:101?110|
|5..||Lingam R,Scott J. Treatment non-adherence in affective disordersActa Psychiatr Scand 2002;105:164–172. [doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1r084.x]|
|5..||Lingam R, Scott J (2002) Treatment non-adherence in affective disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 105:164?172 [pmid: 11939969]|
|6..||Dijk L,Heerdink E,Somai D,Dulmen S,Sluijs E,Ridder D,Griens AMGF,Bensing JM. Patient risk profiles and practice variation in non adherence to antidepressants, antihypertensives and oral hypoglycemicsBMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:51–61. [doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-51]|
|6..||van Dijk L, Heerdink E, Somai D, van Dulmen S, Sluijs E, de Ridder D, Griens AMGF, Bensing JM (2007) Patient risk profiles and practice variation in non adherence to antidepressants, antihypertensives and oral hypoglycemics. BMC Health Serv Res 7:51?61 [pmid: 17425792]|
|7..||Bull SA,Hunkeler EM,Lee JY,Rowland CR,Williamson TE,Schwab JR,Hurt SW. Discontinuation or switching selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitorsAnn Pharmacother 2002;36:578–584. [doi: 10.1345/aph.1A254]|
|7..||Bull SA, Hunkeler EM, Lee JY, Rowland CR, Williamson TE, Schwab JR, Hurt SW (2002) Discontinuation or switching selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors. Ann Pharmacother 36:578?584 [pmid: 11918502]|
|8..||Demyttenaere K,Enzlin P,Dew? W,Boulanger B,Bie JD,Troyer WD,Mesters P. Compliance with antidepressants in a primary care setting, 1: beyond lack of efficacy and adverse eventsJ Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(suppl 22):30–33.|
|8..||Demyttenaere K, Enzlin P, Dew? W, Boulanger B, Bie JD, Troyer WD, Mesters P (2001) Compliance with antidepressants in a primary care setting, 1: beyond lack of efficacy and adverse events. J Clin Psychiatry 62[Suppl 22]:30?33 [pmid: 11599645]|
|9..||Vergouwen ACM,Bakker A,Katon WJ,Verheij TJ,Koerselman F. Improving adherence to antidepressants: a systematic review of interventionsJ Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:1415–1420.|
|9..||Vergouwen ACM, Bakker A, Katon WJ, Verheij TJ, Koerselman F (2003) Improving adherence to antidepressants: a systematic review of interventions. J Clin Psychiatry 64:1415?1420 [pmid: 14728101]|
|10..||Pampallona S,Bollini B,Tibaldi G,Kupelnick B,Munizza C. Patient adherence in the treatment of depressionBr J Psychiatry 2002;180:104–109. [doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.2.104]|
|10..||Pampallona S, Bollini B, Tibaldi G, Kupelnick B, Munizza C (2002) Patient adherence in the treatment of depression. Br J Psychiatry 180:104?109 [pmid: 11823317]|
|11..||Egberts ACG,Smulders M,Koning FHP,Meyboom RHB,Leufkens HMG. Can adverse drug reactions be detected earlier? A comparison of reports by patients and professionalsBr Med J 1996;313:530–531.|
|11..||Egberts ACG, Smulders M, De Koning FHP, Meyboom RHB, Leufkens HMG (1996) Can adverse drug reactions be detected earlier? A comparison of reports by patients and professionals. Br Med J 313:530?531 [pmid: 8789980]|
|12..||Anonymous (2001) International monitoring of adverse reactions to drugs. Adverse reaction terminology. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Uppsala|
|13..||Puijenbroek E,Grootheest VAC,Diemont WL,Leufkens HGM,Egberts ACG. Determinants of signal selection in a spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactionsBr J Clin Pharmacol 2002;52:579–586. [doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01501.x]|
|13..||Van Puijenbroek E, Grootheest VAC, Diemont WL, Leufkens HGM, Egberts ACG (2002) Determinants of signal selection in a spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 52:579?586 [pmid: 11736867]|
|14..||Meyboom RHB,Lindquist M,Flygare A-K,Biriell C,Edwards IR. The value of reporting therapeutic ineffectiveness as an adverse drug reactionDrug Safety 2000;23:95–99. [doi: 10.2165/00002018-200023020-00001]|
|14..||Meyboom RHB, Lindquist M, Flygare A-K, Biriell C, Edwards IR (2000). The value of reporting therapeutic ineffectiveness as an adverse drug reaction. Drug Safety 23:95?99 [pmid: 10945372]|
|15..||Mitchell AJ. High medication discontinuation rates in psychiatry. How often is it understandable?J Clin Psychopharmacol 2006;26:109–112. [doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000205845.36042.ba]|
|15..||Mitchell AJ (2006) High medication discontinuation rates in psychiatry. How often is it understandable? J Clin Psychopharmacol 26:109?112 [pmid: 16633137]|
|16..||Hu XH,Bull SA,Hunkeler EM,Ming EE,Lee JY,Fireman B,Markson LE. Incidence and duration of side effects and those rated as bothersome with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment for depression: patient reports versus physician estimateJ Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:959–965.|
|16..||Hu XH, Bull SA, Hunkeler EM, Ming EE, Lee JY, Fireman B, Markson LE (2004) Incidence and duration of side effects and those rated as bothersome with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment for depression: patient reports versus physician estimate. J Clin Psychiatry 65:959?965 [pmid: 15291685]|
|17..||Eland IA,Belton KJ,Meiners AP,Rawlins MD,Stricker BHC. Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactionsBr J Clin Pharmacol 1999;48:623–627. [doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00060.x]|
|17..||Eland IA, Belton KJ, Grootheest vAC, Meiners AP, Rawlins MD, Stricker BHC (1999) Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48:623?627 [pmid: 10583035]|
|18..||Inman W,Rawson N,Wilton L,Pearce G,Speirs C. Post-marketing surveillance of enalapril I: results of prescription-event monitoringBr Med J 1988;297:826–829.|
|18..||Inman W, Rawson N, Wilton L, Pearce G, Speirs C (1988) Post-marketing surveillance of enalapril I: results of prescription-event monitoring. Br Med J 297:826?829 [pmid: 2846101]|
|19..||Blenkinsopp A,Wilkie P,Wang M,Routledge P. Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published experienceBr J Clin Pharmacol 2006;63:148–156. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02746.x]|
|19..||Blenkinsopp A, Wilkie P, Wang M, Routledge P (2006) Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol 63:148?156 [pmid: 17274788]|
|20..||Grootheest AC,Passier JL,Puijenbroek EP. Direct reporting of side effects by the patient: favourable experience in the first yearNed Tijdschr Geneeskunde 2005;149:529–533.|
|20..||Van Grootheest AC, Passier JL, Van Puijenbroek EP (2005) Direct reporting of side effects by the patient: favourable experience in the first year. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskunde 149:529?533|
|21..||Aikens JE,Nease DE,Nau DP,Klinkman MS,Schwenk TL. Adherence to maintenance-phase antidepressant medication as a function of patient beliefs about medicationAnn Fam Med 2005;3:23–30. [doi: 10.1370/afm.238]|
|21..||Aikens JE, Nease DE, Nau DP, Klinkman MS, Schwenk TL (2005) Adherence to maintenance-phase antidepressant medication as a function of patient beliefs about medication. Ann Fam Med 3:23?30 [pmid: 15671187]|
Nature of the reported experiences related to antidepressant use reported to a medicine reporting system (http://www.meldpuntmedicijnen.nl)a
|Issue||Proportion of total number of individuals (n?=?258) reporting on antidepressant use||Nature of issue||Proportion individuals reporting on a specific issue|
|Effectiveness||36% (n?=?92)||Ineffectiveness||16% (n?=?40)|
|Positive effect||17% (n?=?45)|
|Side effects||84% (n?=?217)||Negative side effect||78% (n?=?202)|
|Positive side effect||1% (n?=?3)|
|Absence of side effect||5% (n?=?12)|
|Practical issues||5% (n?=?14)|
|Reimbursement and availability issues||2% (n?=?4)|
aA total of 258 reporters submitted 327 experiences. The reported experiences are expressed as a percentage of the total number of individuals submitting reports
Relevance of the most frequently reported side effects related to antidepressant use
|Side effect||Number of reported experiences (n)||Impact (% perceived as ?very negative?)||Discontinuation of antidepressant use (%)|
|?Somnolence, drowsiness, fatigue||39||51||59|
|Suicidal attempt, thought or tendencya||9||78||78|
aSuicidal attempts, thoughts or tendency is also included, although the number of reported experiences was less than 15.
Reported side effects on antidepressants by patients compared with reported side effects on antidepressants by health care professionals (HCPs)
|Side effect||Number of reported side effects by patients||Percentage of total number of side effects (n?=?670)||Number of reported side effects by HCPs||Percentage of total number of side effects (n?=?471)||Odds ratio (95%?CI)a|
|Top 15 most frequently reported side effects by patients|
|??Weight increase||48||7.2||6||1.3||5.98 (2.54?14.09)|
|??Sexual problems||43||6.4||6||1.3||5.31 (2.24?12.59)|
|??Discontinuation symptoms||40||6.0||3||0.6||14.14 (4.35?45.93)|
|??Somnolence, drowsiness, fatigue||39||5.8||8||1.7||3.58 (1.66?7.73)|
|??Insomnia, sleeplessness||29||4.3||4||0.8||5.28 (1.84?15.13)|
|??Nausea, gaggingb||23||3.4||8||1.7||2.05 (0.91?4.64)|
|??Dizziness, faintingb||23||3.4||8||1.7||2.05 (0.91?4.64)|
|??Dry mouth||18||2.7||3||0.6||4.31 (1.26?14.71)|
|??Abdominal pain||14||2.1||3||0.6||3.33 (0.95?11.65)|
|??Depressed mood||11||1.6||3||0.6||2.60 (0.72?9.39)|
|Top 15 most frequently reported side effects by HCPs|
|??Rash, urticaria and pruritis||3||0.4||23||4.9||0.09 (0.03?0.29)|
|??Muscle and joint complaints||3||0.4||20||4.2||0.10 (0.03?0.34)|
|??Eye and vision disorders||6||0.9||15||3.2||0.27 (0.11?0.71)|
|??Extrapyramidal disorders, Parkinsonism||1||0.1||10||2.1||0.07 (0.01?0.54)|
|??Menstrual disorders, vaginal bleedings||3||0.4||10||2.1||0.21 (0.06?0.76)?|
|??Heart rhythm problems||7||1.0||10||2.1||0.49 (0.18?1.29)|
|??Drug substitution problems||7||1.0||8||1.7||0.61 (0.22?1.70)|
|??Nausea, gaggingb||23||3.4||8||1.7||2.06 (0.91?4.64)|
|??Dizziness, faintingb||23||3.4||8||1.7||2.06 (0.91?4.64)|
95% CI, 95% confidence interval
aOR?>?1: Patients were more likely to report the side effect than the HCPs; OR?<?1: HCPs were more likely to report the side effect than the patients
bSide effects that appear in both the patients? and HCPs? list
Keywords: Keywords Adverse events, Antidepressants, Discontinuation, Patient reporting.
Previous Document: Comparison of collision-induced dissociation and electron-induced dissociation of singly protonated ...
Next Document: MRI tight posterior fossa sign for prenatal diagnosis of Chiari type II malformation.