Document Detail

Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21771267     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
To cite this article: Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE: Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:116-137 ABSTRACT: Authors -  Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE Systematic reviews (SRs) are published with an increasing rate in many fields of biomedical literature, including orthodontics. Although SRs should consolidate the evidence-based characteristics of contemporary orthodontic practice, doubts on the validity of their conclusions have been frequently expressed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methodology and quality characteristics of orthodontic SRs as well as to assess their quality of reporting during the last years. Electronic databases were searched for SRs (without any meta-analytical data synthesis) in the field of orthodontics, indexed up to the start of 2010. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool was used for quality assessment of the included articles. Data were analyzed with Student's t-test, one-way anova, and linear regression. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to represent changes during the years in reporting of key items associated with quality. A total of 110 SRs were included in this evaluation. About half of the SRs (46.4%) were published in orthodontic journals, while few (5.5%) were updates of previously published reviews. Using the AMSTAR tool, thirty (27.3%) of the SRs were found to be of low quality, 63 (57.3%) of medium quality, and 17 (15.5%) of high quality. No significant trend for quality improvement was observed during the last years. The overall quality of orthodontic SRs may be considered as medium. Although the number of orthodontic SRs has increased over the last decade, their quality characteristics can be characterized as moderate.
Sn Papageorgiou; Ma Papadopoulos; Ae Athanasiou
Related Documents :
7426597 - Static perimetry in the study of amblyopic scotomata.
12231337 - Erroneous automated refraction in a case of asteroid hyalosis.
21657527 - Peer reviewed: update on environmental biosensors.
22011737 - Ganglioneuroma of the sphenoid wing: a case report and literature review.
8092107 - Hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide. a report of three cases and review of the lite...
16341867 - Anesthesia for the repeat cesarean section in the parturient with abnormal placentation...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Orthodontics & craniofacial research     Volume:  14     ISSN:  1601-6343     ISO Abbreviation:  Orthod Craniofac Res     Publication Date:  2011 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-07-20     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101144387     Medline TA:  Orthod Craniofac Res     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  116-37     Citation Subset:  D; IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou, Moschos A. Papadopoulos, Athanasios E. Athanasiou, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic rev...
Next Document:  The use of gene therapy vs. corticotomy surgery in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.