Document Detail


Evaluation of a method of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules with computed tomography.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20574707     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: The authors sought to compare the sensitivity and reading time obtained using computer-aided detection (CAD) software as second reader (SR) or concurrent reader (CR) in the identification of pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unenhanced CT scans of 100 consecutive cancer patients were retrospectively reviewed by four readers to identify all solid, noncalcified pulmonary nodules ranging from 3 to 30 mm in diameter. The sensitivity and reading time of each reader and of CAD alone were calculated at 3-mm and 5-mm thresholds with respect to the reference standard, consisting of a consensus reading by the four radiologists involved in the study. The McNemar test was used to compare the sensitivities obtained by reading without CAD (readers 1 and 2), with CAD as SR (readers 1 and 2 with a 2-month delay), and with CAD as CR (readers 3 and 4). The paired Student's t test was used to compare reading times. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 258 and 224 nodules were identified at 3-mm and 5-mm thresholds, respectively. The sensitivity of CAD alone was 62.79% and 67.41% at the 3-mm and 5-mm threshold values respectively, with 4.15 and 2.96 false-positive findings per examination. CAD as SR produced a significant increase in sensitivity (p<0.001) in nodule detection with respect to reading without CAD both at 3 mm (12.01%) and 5 mm (10.04%); the average increase in sensitivity obtained when comparing CAD as SR to CAD as CR was statistically significant (p<0.025) both at the 3-mm (5.35%) and 5-mm (4.68%) thresholds. CAD as CR produced a nonsignificant increase in sensitivity compared with reading without CAD (p>0.05). Mean reading time using CAD as SR (330 s) was significantly longer than reading without CAD (135 s, p<0.001) and reading with CAD as CR (195 s, p<0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CAD as CR, without any significant increase in reading time, produces no significant increase in sensitivity in pulmonary nodule detection when compared with reading without CAD (p>0.05); CAD as SR, at the cost of longer reading times, increases sensitivity when compared with reading without CAD (p<0.001) or with CAD as CR (p<0.025).
Authors:
G Foti; N Faccioli; M D'Onofrio; A Contro; T Milazzo; R Pozzi Mucelli
Related Documents :
11562937 - Pilot detection study of alpha(1) antitrypsin deficiency in a targeted population.
1104017 - Reliability of plethysmography, the single breath oxygen test, and spirometry in popula...
17709927 - Can spirometry, pulse oximetry and dyspnea scoring reflect respiratory failure in patie...
10709227 - Automated classification of human atrial fibrillation from intraatrial electrograms.
8885687 - A study on simplification of the standard language test of aphasia (slta).
16416217 - Validation of the blood quininium resin test for assessing gastric hypochlorhydria.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2010-06-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  La Radiologia medica     Volume:  115     ISSN:  1826-6983     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiol Med     Publication Date:  2010 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-08     Completed Date:  2010-11-08     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0177625     Medline TA:  Radiol Med     Country:  Italy    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng; ita     Pagination:  950-61     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Istituto di Radiologia, Policlinico GB Rossi, Università di Verona, Ple LA Scuro, 37134 Verona, Italy. gfoti81@yahoo.it
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule / radiography*
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Prevalence of extravascular collateral findings during 64-slice CT angiography of the abdominal aort...
Next Document:  Lower-lobe shrinkage relative to total lung volume in collagen vascular diseases.