Document Detail


Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections--completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12521498     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
We set out to complete the audit cycle of caesarean deliveries in order to determine if improvements could be achieved. This was a prospective review of clinical notes in a Central London Teaching Hospital. The study involved 152 women delivering between 18 May and 23 August 1998, and 226 women over the same time period in 1999. For each case, a proforma was completed within 72 hours of delivery. We recorded the total and emergency section rate; indications; decision-to-delivery times; reasons for delay; prescription of ranitidine and heparin; fetal blood samples and cord pH values. The total caesarean section rate decreased from 20.9% to 19.2%. The emergency section rate was unchanged at 14.8% in 1998 (70.9% of total) and 13.6% in 1999 (70.8% of total). Main reasons for emergency sections were failure to progress (59% in 1998, 47% in 1999) and fetal distress (27% in 1998, 34% in 1999). For failure to progress 76% of cases were performed within 1 hour in 1998 vs. 64% of cases in 1999. For fetal distress 39% of cases were delivered within 30 minutes in both years. Fetal blood samples were taken in 41% of fetal distress cases in 1998 and 34% in 1999. Cord pH was documented in 60% of emergency cases in 1998 (96% in 1999). Prescription of ranitidine rose from 53% to 81%. Heparin was well prescribed in both years (88% vs. 87%). Following the initial audit, the total caesarean section rate was significantly lower but there was no difference in the emergency section rate. The implementations had no effect on decision-to-delivery times or use of fetal blood sampling. Improvements were seen in obtaining cord pH values and ranitidine prescription.
Authors:
Deborah Bruce; Sophia Stone; Kate Harding
Related Documents :
20825058 - Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine corpus--a case report.
12952688 - Two-year evaluation of telepathology.
23426038 - The perioperative use of nitrous oxide: renaissance of an old gas or funeral of an anci...
24639948 - Localized nodular tenosynovitis originated near the medial plicae.
16681778 - Leiomyosarcoma of the vagina: case report and literature review.
21820988 - Mercury as a cause of fulminant hepatic failure in a child: case report and literature ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology     Volume:  22     ISSN:  0144-3615     ISO Abbreviation:  J Obstet Gynaecol     Publication Date:  2002 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-01-10     Completed Date:  2003-01-30     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8309140     Medline TA:  J Obstet Gynaecol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  273-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Women's Health Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals Trust, Guy's Hospital, St Thomas Street, London, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cesarean Section / statistics & numerical data,  utilization*
Emergencies
Female
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
London
Medical Audit
Pregnancy
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Early teenage pregnancy outcome: a comparison between a standard and a dedicated teenage antenatal c...
Next Document:  Transforming growth factor beta(1) levels in platelet depleted plasma in African women with pre-ecla...