Document Detail


Evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation efficacy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  2916427     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The effect of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans is unknown. This prospective, randomized evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds was performed in 21 survivors of ventricular fibrillation (VF) undergoing cardiac surgery. Defibrillation was always performed with 2 identical large rectangular, wire mesh electrodes positioned over the anterior wall of the right ventricle and the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle. The initial electrode polarity for the left ventricular (LV) electrode was chosen randomly for determination of the defibrillation threshold. Subsequently, electrode polarity was reversed. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that would effectively terminate VF with a single discharge delivered 10 seconds after initiation of an episode of VF with alternating current. For each defibrillation pulse, voltage, current, resistance and delivered energy were recorded. Of the 21 patients, 15 (71%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was positive, 2 patients (10%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was negative and 4 patients (19%) had equal defibrillation thresholds (within 0.5 J) regardless of polarity. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 370 +/- 88 volts when the LV electrode was negative and 320 +/- 109 volts (14% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.014). Mean leading edge defibrillation threshold current was 9.3 +/- 3.1 amps when the LV electrode was negative compared to 7.7 +/- 3.1 amps (17% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.0033). There were no differences in resistance with the 2 configurations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Authors:
G H Bardy; T D Ivey; M D Allen; G Johnson; H L Greene
Related Documents :
23842597 - Comparison of modified borg scale and visual analog scale dyspnea scores in predicting ...
23393067 - Does echocardiography accurately reflect cmr-determined changes in left ventricular par...
7064817 - Inability of exercise-induced r wave changes to predict coronary artery disease.
6517987 - Pathophysiology and treatment of septic shock.
8124847 - Diagnostic evaluation of the patient with coronary artery disease.
15249317 - Sustained maintenance of exercise induced muscle strength gains and normal bone mineral...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of cardiology     Volume:  63     ISSN:  0002-9149     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  1989 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1989-03-17     Completed Date:  1989-03-17     Revised Date:  2007-11-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0207277     Medline TA:  Am J Cardiol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  433-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Electric Conductivity
Electric Countershock / instrumentation*
Electrodes
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
R01-HL31472-01A3/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS; R23-HL36170-01/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Regional and global biventricular function during dipyridamole stress testing.
Next Document:  Effect of intravenous propranolol or verapamil on infant orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia.