Document Detail


Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening and protection programme.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9472868     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
We set out to evaluate a clinical foot-screening programme in terms of primary outcomes (reductions in the incidence of ulcers and lower limb amputation) and process outcomes (compliance with screening, the number of patients not completing the programme and the use of chiropody services and prescribed footwear and cost). All but 4 of 2001 patients attending a general diabetic out-patient clinic were allocated randomly to index and control groups. The exceptions were patients who presented with active ulcers and were placed in the index group. Primary and secondary screening programmes identified 128 high risk patients in the index group and these were admitted to the foot protection programme. At 2-year follow-up, 11 fewer ulcers were reported from the index group. There were 7 amputations (1 major, 6 minor) in the index group and 23 (12 major and 13 minor) in the control group. The differences were not statistically significant for ulceration or minor amputations but significant for major amputations (p < 0.01). The total cost of the 2-year programme was pounds sterling 100,372 (1991-92 costs), with a mean cost per patient of approximately pounds sterling 100. Taking pounds sterling 12,000 as a conservative estimate of the cost of a major amputation, the foot clinic was cost-effective in terms of amputations averted. The process outcomes were much less satisfactory. Cost-effectiveness could have been improved if it had been possible to improve patient compliance.
Authors:
C J McCabe; R C Stevenson; A M Dolan
Related Documents :
15201618 - Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: a retrospective analysis of eff...
11736828 - Cost of surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass surgery.
16551208 - An examination of treatment patterns and costs of care among patients with benign prost...
18048858 - Treatment pathways, resource use, and costs of endovascular coiling versus surgical cli...
22628518 - Magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for ablation of free wall accessory pathways...
3233718 - Progression of aortic stenosis in the elderly detected by noninvasive methods.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association     Volume:  15     ISSN:  0742-3071     ISO Abbreviation:  Diabet. Med.     Publication Date:  1998 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-03-26     Completed Date:  1998-03-26     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8500858     Medline TA:  Diabet Med     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  80-4     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Ambulatory Care Facilities / economics,  standards*
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diabetic Foot / diagnosis*,  economics
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Mass Screening / economics,  methods*
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Compliance
Quality Assurance, Health Care

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  An intensive weight loss programme in established type 2 diabetes and controls: effects on weight an...
Next Document:  Differences in medical and surgical therapy for stroke prevention between leading experts in North A...