Document Detail


Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20526199     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: A method for fitting multichannel compression hearing aids with an extended high-frequency response, called CAMEQ2-HF, was described by . This study describes an evaluation of the method, using a 16-channel behind the ear hearing aid incorporating slow-acting compression and providing gain for frequencies up to 7500 Hz.
DESIGN: Eleven participants with mild to moderate cochlear hearing loss were fitted bilaterally using the gains prescribed by CAMEQ2-HF. The fittings were checked using real-ear measurements with swept sinusoidal signals, and adjustments were made so that the target gains at the center frequency of each channel were achieved with a typical tolerance of +/-3 dB for an input level of 65 dB and with a typical tolerance of +/-5 dB for levels of 50 and 80 dB SPL. Participants were asked to wear the hearing aids as much as possible in their everyday lives and to fill in questionnaires and a structured diary about their experience of loudness and their listening problems in everyday life, both for listening unaided and after a period of use of the aids.
RESULTS: Scores obtained using the Profile of Aided Loudness (PAL) indicated that the hearing aids led to a clear increase in loudness (relative to unaided listening) for weak sounds and to smaller increases in loudness for sounds of medium and high intensity. For aided listening, strong sounds were typically rated as "loud, but OK." Satisfaction ratings for loudness obtained using the PAL showed only small differences between unaided and aided listening. Responses obtained via the structured diary (for aided listening only) indicated that target speech was usually judged as "loud enough" in a variety of situations. Clarity judgments ranged from "reasonably clear" to "OK" for most situations, but fell to "not very clear" for a noisy group situation. The loudness of background sounds was mostly judged as "OK," except for the noisy group situation in which the background was judged "bit loud." Results from the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing-Aid Benefit questionnaire indicated fewer problems with "ease of communication," "reverberation," and "background noise" for aided than for unaided listening, but more problems with "aversiveness." Nine of 11 ratings of overall sound quality fell in the categories "satisfied" or "very satisfied."
CONCLUSIONS: The CAMEQ2-HF fitting method generally led to satisfactory loudness and sound quality in everyday life for people with mild to moderate hearing loss.
Authors:
Brian C J Moore; Christian Füllgrabe
Related Documents :
6523039 - Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
486809 - Earphone termination and the response of behind-the-ear hearing aids.
6227579 - Aids to hearing of a different kind.
3366309 - The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit.
2107929 - Hearing disability in people aged 50-65: effectiveness and acceptability of rehabilitat...
515689 - Programmable hearing aid with multichannel compression.
6523039 - Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
9603689 - Social relationships and immune processes in hiv seropositive gay and bisexual men.
2031649 - Implementing an aids policy. retaining and promoting productivity in the workplace.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ear and hearing     Volume:  31     ISSN:  1538-4667     ISO Abbreviation:  Ear Hear     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-02     Completed Date:  2011-01-04     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8005585     Medline TA:  Ear Hear     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  657-66     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. bcjm@cam.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Female
Hearing Aids*
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / therapy*
Humans
Loudness Perception
Male
Medical Records
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction*
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Fitting / methods
Severity of Illness Index
Speech Perception
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
//Medical Research Council

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Extracranial injuries are important in determining mortality of neurotrauma*
Next Document:  Estimating absolute risks in the presence of nonadherence: an application to a follow-up study with ...