Document Detail


Evaluation of the Bullard, GlideScope, Viewmax, and Macintosh laryngoscopes using a cadaver model to simulate the difficult airway.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21296244     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance and cervical (C)-spine movement associated with laryngoscopy using the Bullard laryngoscope (BL), GlideScope videolaryngoscope (GVL), Viewmax, and Macintosh laryngoscopes during conditions of a) unrestricted and b) restricted C-spine and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility.
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, randomized, crossover study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS: 21 cadavers with intact C-spine anatomy.
INTERVENTIONS: Each cadaver underwent to total of 8 intubation attempts to complete the intubation protocol using all four devices under unrestricted and restricted C-spine and TMJ mobility.
MEASUREMENTS: Laryngoscopic view was graded using the modified Cormack-Lehane system. Time to best laryngoscopic view and total time to intubation were recorded. C-spine movement was measured between McGregor's line and each vertebra from radiographs taken at baseline and at best laryngoscopic view.
MAIN RESULTS: During both intubating conditions, the BL achieved the highest number of modified Cormack-Lehane grade 1 and 2A laryngoscopic views as compared to the other three devices (P < 0.05) and had fewer intubation failures than the Viewmax or Macintosh laryngoscopes (P < 0.05). The GVL had superior laryngoscopic performance as compared to the Viewmax and Macintosh laryngoscopes (P < 0.05) and had fewer intubation failures than those two devices (P < 0.05). All devices except the Macintosh laryngoscope in restricted mobility achieved median times to intubation in less than 30 seconds. For both conditions, BL showed the least total absolute movement between Occiput/C1 and C3/C4 of all the devices (all P < 0.05). Most of the difference was seen at C1/C2.
CONCLUSIONS: In cadavers with unrestricted and restricted C-spine mobility, the BL provided superior laryngoscopic views, comparable intubating times, and less C-spine movement than the GVL, Viewmax, or Macintosh laryngoscopes.
Authors:
Jorge E Zamora; Robert L Nolan; Sumit Sharan; Andrew G Day
Related Documents :
17148314 - Kin competition promotes dispersal in a male pollinating fig wasp.
12492404 - Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms.
17737484 - Cryptic moths: effects on background selections of painting the circumocular scales.
21192994 - Satiety: let's put claims in the right context. comment on booth & nouwen's 'satiety - ...
2289144 - Different changes in spontaneous field potential oscillations precede epileptiform burs...
20136234 - The effect of signal duration on the underwater hearing thresholds of two harbor seals ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical anesthesia     Volume:  23     ISSN:  1873-4529     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Anesth     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-02-07     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8812166     Medline TA:  J Clin Anesth     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  27-34     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston Ontario, Canada K7L 2V7.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A survey of airway training among U.S. and Canadian Anesthesiology residency programs.
Next Document:  Ergonomic task analysis of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block: a pilot study.