Document Detail


Evaluating u.s. Medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24073604     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This paper examines how well U.S. medical school institutions are doing to promote research integrity. It is an important question to ask in order to determine whether there are sufficient and adequate protections in place to protect the U.S. Public Health Service's (PHS) resources devoted to medical research. This paper focuses on 5,100 medical school researchers' knowledge of what constitutes research misconduct as well as their willingness to report it to the research integrity officer (RIO) and educate their Ph.D. trainees. We learned that 5.6% of researchers could correctly distinguish seven or more of the nine scenarios that depicted likely research misconduct, as defined by the PHS regulations, from scenarios describing other ethical issues. Instead, researchers had expansive definitions and often inappropriately identified infractions such as conflicts of interest, Institutional Review Board (IRB) violations, and other breaches in ethical standards to be research misconduct. In addition, researchers who correctly identified four instances of likely research misconduct in the test items were highly unlikely to report their observations to a RIO. Researchers also provided insight on the factors they believe influence their decision making process of whether to report research misconduct. In addition, this paper also reports on the guidance that faculty said they provided their trainees on research misconduct issues. We conclude with a discussion and recommendations on what institutional leaders might consider doing in order to enhance their research integrity efforts and protect their institution's reputation.
Authors:
Sandra Larsen Titus
Related Documents :
23856514 - An etymological "autopsy" of morgagni's title: de sedibus et causis morborum per anatom...
19594724 - A precautionary principle for dual use research in the life sciences.
15829394 - Procedural sedation and analgesia: a review and new concepts.
23061574 - Is it really all about the money? reconsidering non-financial interests in medical rese...
24655604 - Strengths and weaknesses of guideline approaches to safeguard voluntary informed consen...
18507604 - A review of psychometric properties of feeding assessment tools used in neonates.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Accountability in research     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1545-5815     ISO Abbreviation:  Account Res     Publication Date:  2014  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-09-30     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9100813     Medline TA:  Account Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  9-25     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
a Department of Health and Human Services , Office of Research Integrity , Rockville , Maryland , USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Global research integrity in relation to the United states' research-integrity infrastructure.
Next Document:  Articulating a role for program evaluation in responsible conduct of research programs.