| Evaluating medical expert systems. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 3303352 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Approximately 90% of all computerized medical expert systems have not been evaluated in clinical environments. This paper: identifies the principal methods used to assess the performance of medical expert systems in both laboratory and clinical settings, describes the different research strategies used in the evaluation of medical expert systems at different development stages, and discusses past evaluation efforts in relationship to future applications of different decision support technologies and expert systems in health care. |
| | |
Authors:
|
H P Lundsgaarde |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Social science & medicine (1982) Volume: 24 ISSN: 0277-9536 ISO Abbreviation: Soc Sci Med Publication Date: 1987 |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 1987-08-28 Completed Date: 1987-08-28 Revised Date: 2008-11-21 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8303205 Medline TA: Soc Sci Med Country: ENGLAND |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 805-19 Citation Subset: IM |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Cardiology Decision Making, Computer-Assisted* Dermatology Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted General Surgery Humans Information Systems Internal Medicine Medical Oncology Mental Health Therapy, Computer-Assisted |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Ultrasonic investigation of the hip in newborns in the diagnosis of congenital hip dislocation: clas...
Next Document: The demand for health inputs and their impact on the black neonatal mortality rate in the U.S.