Document Detail


Evaluating medical expert systems.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  3303352     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Approximately 90% of all computerized medical expert systems have not been evaluated in clinical environments. This paper: identifies the principal methods used to assess the performance of medical expert systems in both laboratory and clinical settings, describes the different research strategies used in the evaluation of medical expert systems at different development stages, and discusses past evaluation efforts in relationship to future applications of different decision support technologies and expert systems in health care.
Authors:
H P Lundsgaarde
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Social science & medicine (1982)     Volume:  24     ISSN:  0277-9536     ISO Abbreviation:  Soc Sci Med     Publication Date:  1987  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1987-08-28     Completed Date:  1987-08-28     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8303205     Medline TA:  Soc Sci Med     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  805-19     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cardiology
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted*
Dermatology
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
General Surgery
Humans
Information Systems
Internal Medicine
Medical Oncology
Mental Health
Therapy, Computer-Assisted

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Ultrasonic investigation of the hip in newborns in the diagnosis of congenital hip dislocation: clas...
Next Document:  The demand for health inputs and their impact on the black neonatal mortality rate in the U.S.