Document Detail


Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18055884     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The number of nurses independently prescribing medicines in England is rising steadily. There had been no attempt systematically to evaluate the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing decisions.
AIMS: (i) To establish a method of assessing the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing decisions; (ii) to evaluate the prescribing decisions of a sample of nurses, using this method.
METHOD: A modified version of the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) was developed, piloted and subsequently used by seven medical prescribing experts to rate transcripts of 12 nurse prescriber consultations selected from a larger database of 118 audio-recorded consultations collected as part of a national evaluation. Experts were also able to give written qualitative comments on each of the MAI dimensions applied to each of the consultations.
ANALYSIS: Experts' ratings were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative comments were subjected to a process of content analysis to identify themes within and across both MAI items and consultations.
RESULTS: Experts' application of the modified MAI to transcripts of nurse prescriber consultations demonstrated validity and feasibility as a method of assessing the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing decisions. In the majority of assessments made by the expert panel, nurses' prescribing decisions were rated as clinically appropriate on all nine items in the MAI.
CONCLUSION: A valid and feasible method of assessing the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice has been developed using a modified MAI and transcripts of audio-recorded consultations sent to a panel of prescribing experts. Prescribing nurses in this study were generally considered to be making clinically appropriate prescribing decisions. This approach to measuring prescribing appropriateness could be used as part of quality assurance in routine practice, as a method of identifying continuing professional development needs, or in future research as the expansion of non-medical prescribing continues.
Authors:
Sue Latter; Jill Maben; Michelle Myall; Amanda Young
Related Documents :
23022944 - Nursing care program for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.
1529474 - What nurse managers can learn from japanese management style.
23333954 - Shipping out instead of shaping up: rehospitalization from nursing homes as an unintend...
24213854 - Conservation of the critically endangered eastern australian population of the grey nur...
6622044 - A comparison of the sites at which pentazocine and morphine act to produce analgesia.
12929344 - Developing the nurse's role in rehabilitation.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Quality & safety in health care     Volume:  16     ISSN:  1475-3901     ISO Abbreviation:  Qual Saf Health Care     Publication Date:  2007 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-12-06     Completed Date:  2007-12-27     Revised Date:  2013-06-06    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101136980     Medline TA:  Qual Saf Health Care     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  415-21     Citation Subset:  H    
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Building 67, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England. sml@soton.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Clinical Competence*
Consensus
Drug Prescriptions
Drug Therapy / nursing*
England
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Nurse Practitioners / education,  standards*
Nursing Audit / methods*
Peer Review, Health Care
Professional Autonomy
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the collaborative method: reflections from a sing...
Next Document:  Educational quality improvement report: outcomes from a revised morbidity and mortality format that ...