Document Detail


Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20676776     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In discussions about the legalisation of active, voluntary euthanasia it is sometimes claimed that what should happen in a liberal society is that the two sides in the debate "agree to disagree". This paper explores what is entailed by agreeing to disagree and shows that this is considerably more complicated than what is usually believed to be the case. Agreeing to disagree is philosophically problematic and will often lead to an unstable compromise.
Authors:
Søren Holm
Related Documents :
14972766 - Pragmatic bioethics and the big fat moral community.
11246786 - Economics and euthanasia.
20497166 - Reflections on 'autistic integrity'.
18818586 - Progress toward measles elimination--japan, 1999-2008.
21444746 - Pathology of the laboratory mouse: an international workshop on challenges for high thr...
20197306 - Organ donation by capital prisoners in china: reflections in confucian ethics.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medicine, health care, and philosophy     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1572-8633     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Health Care Philos     Publication Date:  2010 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-05     Completed Date:  2011-01-28     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9815900     Medline TA:  Med Health Care Philos     Country:  Netherlands    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  399-402     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. Soren.holm@manchester.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Death*
Decision Making / ethics
Dissent and Disputes
Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary / ethics*,  legislation & jurisprudence
Great Britain
Health Policy
Humans
Netherlands
Politics
Refusal to Treat / ethics,  legislation & jurisprudence

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Can curative or life-sustaining treatment be withheld or withdrawn? The opinions and views of Indian...
Next Document:  Lymphocytic hypophysitis in a patient presenting with sequential episodes of optic neuritis.