Document Detail


Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18234941     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In psychiatry, caregivers try to get free and informed consent of patients, but often feel required to restrict freedom and to use coercion. The present article develops ethical advice given by an Ethics Committee for Mental Health Care. The advice recommends an ethical ideal of shared deliberation, consisting of information, motivation, consensus and evaluation. For the exceptional use of coercion, the advice develops three criteria, namely incapacity to deliberate, threat of serious harm and proportionality between harm and coercion. The article also discusses the viewpoints of the ethical advice and of the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine: is the advice in agreement with the Convention and can the advice refine the guidelines of the Convention for the particular context of psychiatry? Although the Convention emphasises the autonomy of the individual patient, whereas the advice focuses on the relationships between the partners involved, the advice enjoys a complementary and supportive function in the application of the Convention.
Authors:
A Liégeois; M Eneman
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical ethics     Volume:  34     ISSN:  1473-4257     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Ethics     Publication Date:  2008 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-01-31     Completed Date:  2008-06-02     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513619     Medline TA:  J Med Ethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  73-6     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Faculty of Theology, Catholic University of Leuven, Sint-Michielsstraat 6, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. axel.liegeois@theo.kuleuven.be
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Caregivers / ethics
Coercion*
Commitment of Mentally Ill*
Humans
Informed Consent / ethics
Mental Competency / psychology
Mental Disorders / therapy
Mental Health Services / ethics*,  standards
Mentally Ill Persons / psychology
Patient Rights / ethics*
Professional-Patient Relations / ethics

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Terminal sedation and the "imminence condition".
Next Document:  Ulysses arrangements in psychiatry: a matter of good care?