Document Detail


Ethical pluralism without complementarity.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15259202     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Grinnell, Bishop, and McCullough (2002) have proposed extending Bohr's notion of complementarity from the realm of quantum physics to that of bioethics, arguing that many ethical disputes cannot in principle be resolved. On this view, we should give up the aim of reaching all-things-considered moral verdicts on a variety of disputed questions, settling instead for a holism of irreducibly complementary perspectives. I discuss a number of difficulties with this proposal, and argue that the desire for inclusiveness that motivates it is properly captured through a different approach to ethical pluralism already familiar in moral philosophy, which does allow for resolution.
Authors:
William J Fitzpatrick
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Perspectives in biology and medicine     Volume:  47     ISSN:  0031-5982     ISO Abbreviation:  Perspect. Biol. Med.     Publication Date:  2004  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-07-19     Completed Date:  2004-08-11     Revised Date:  2004-12-04    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401132     Medline TA:  Perspect Biol Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  181-8     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Virginia Tech, 229 Major Williams Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0126, USA. wfitzpat@vt.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Bioethics*
Ethical Analysis
Ethical Theory
Humans

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  "The visible skeleton series": the art of Laura Ferguson.
Next Document:  Hitler's penicillin.