Document Detail

Ethical controversies in prenatal microarray.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23454982     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chromosome microarray (CMA) analysis enables genome interrogation at a much higher resolution than is possible with conventional karyotyping. CMA is considered 'standard of care' for postnatal genetic testing, yet its introduction into the prenatal setting has been delayed, in part because of ethical concerns about possible psychosocial harm and deficits in informed consent.
RECENT FINDINGS: The findings of several large trials have now been reported, allowing preliminary quantification of the relative benefits and harms of CMA in prenatal diagnosis. Qualitative studies have also provided insights into the patient experience particularly in cases in which results of uncertain significance are provided. In an attempt to minimize potential harms, some professional guidelines have suggested limiting access to CMA to patients with fetal abnormality on ultrasound, limiting the diagnostic power of CMA by using targeted platforms or limiting reporting.
SUMMARY: We provide an overview of the relative benefits and harms of prenatal CMA, and critically examine the strategies proposed to minimize harms in the context of other important ethical issues such as patient autonomy, justice and equity of access. We advocate for improved patient consent, counselling and support so that patients can fully benefit from the improved diagnostic yield of CMA despite the challenges that are intrinsic to the prenatal setting.
Zornitza Stark; Lynn Gillam; Susan P Walker; George McGillivray
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology     Volume:  25     ISSN:  1473-656X     ISO Abbreviation:  Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.     Publication Date:  2013 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-03-04     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9007264     Medline TA:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  133-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
aVictorian Clinical Genetics Service and Murdoch Children's Research Institute bRoyal Women's Hospital cChildren's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria dSchool of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne eDepartment of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria fDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Nurses, industrial action and ethics: Considerations from the 2010 South African public-sector strik...
Next Document:  Value-based resource management: a model for best value nursing care.