Document Detail


Estimation of central aortic blood pressure: a systematic meta-analysis of available techniques.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24937639     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND:: Central aortic blood pressure (cBP) is often promoted to be a superior predictor of cardiovascular risk compared to brachial blood pressure, and brachial-central pulse pressure amplification is also suggested as prognostic. Several devices and techniques, each purporting to estimate cBP, have entered commercial use. The interchangeability of cBP measurements between devices and the influence of disease states on central to brachial pulse pressure amplification remain unclear. The useful measurement of cBP in clinical trials is dependent on clarification of these issues.
METHOD:: We performed a systematic meta-analysis of studies reporting cBP between 2000 and 2012. Studies were included if both central and brachial SBPs (cSBP and bSBP) were reported. Studies were categorized by technique and according to the prevalent disease state with the bSBP - cSBP difference calculated. Random-effects modeling (inverse variance weighted approach) was used to estimate the pooled mean difference associated with each technique.
RESULTS:: Of the 164 eligible studies, the SphygmoCor device was most commonly reported (110 studies), with direct carotid applanation second-most utilized (31 studies). In 30 included invasive cohorts, the measured cSBP did not differ significantly from the oscillometric bSBP recorded [mean difference 4.19 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.13 to 12.51], whereas mean differences of 12.77 mmHg (95% CI 11.93, 13.60) and 8.83 mmHg (95% CI 7.86, 9.79) were obtained with the SphygmoCor and carotid applanation estimates of cSBP, respectively (both P < 0.05). Conversely, the reported mean cSBP-to-bSBP differences measured across various disease states with SphygmoCor did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSION:: This meta-analysis suggests that noninvasive cBP estimation is device/technique-dependent. Consequently, caution is advisable in applying these devices and techniques across clinical studies.
Authors:
Om Narayan; Joshua Casan; Martin Szarski; Anthony M Dart; Ian T Meredith; James D Cameron
Related Documents :
2453749 - Effects of intrathecal administration of methysergide, phentolamine, and pindolol on pr...
20581089 - Chronic intermittent hypoxia in humans during 28 nights results in blood pressure eleva...
17673569 - Baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during skin surface cooling.
15194739 - Acute shifts in baroreflex control of renal sympathetic nerve activity induced by rem s...
6409409 - Decreased vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation by vasodilator-induced baroreceptor...
23287369 - Hypertension and vascular dynamics in men and women with metabolic syndrome.
10226219 - Benefits of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the design of antihypertensive drug...
20660239 - Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a robotic cadaver study of the dors...
10625739 - Spinal cord ischemia. development of a model in the mouse.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2014-6-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of hypertension     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1473-5598     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Hypertens.     Publication Date:  2014 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-6-17     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8306882     Medline TA:  J Hypertens     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Stronger association of indoor temperature than outdoor temperature with blood pressure in colder mo...
Next Document:  Waterfowl Conservation in the US Prairie Pothole Region: Confronting the Complexities of Climate Cha...