Document Detail


Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  2653039     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This report sought to determine whether estimates of fetal weight are enhanced by using ultrasonographic formulas targeted to the large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetus in both preterm and term pregnancies. Ultrasonographic fetal measurements from 575 singleton pregnancies were obtained within 7 days of delivery. The first 194 fetuses were classified into three groups on the basis of the growth percentile rank of the abdominal circumference (greater than or equal to 90%, greater than 5% and less than 90%, and less than or equal to 5%). Regression analyses were performed to generate three formulas for estimating fetal weight on the basis of the following: Gestational age (weeks) + Head circumference (cm) + 2 x Abdominal circumference (cm) + Femur length (cm). This mathematic model allowed formulation of accurate and concise tables relating the sum of these measurements to estimated birth weight. The accuracy of these formulas was then prospectively compared, first, with the formula published by Hadlock et al. (in 32 large-, 279 appropriate-, and 70 small-for-gestational-age fetuses) and second, with the formula of Weiner et al. (in 82 preterm fetuses). The difference between actual and estimated birth weights generated by the three study formulas had no systemic error (t test, p greater than 0.05). Cumulatively, there was a statistically significant reduction of random error in the birth weight estimates by use of the three study formulas versus the best single formulas of Hadlock et al. (2 SD reduced from 21.6% to 19.8% and absolute 2 SD reduced from 15.6% to 12.2%). Additionally, the three study formulas resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the absolute 2 SD error compared with the best formula by Weiner et al. in fetuses less than or equal to 34 weeks' gestation (2 SD reduced from 19.1% to 13.6%).
Authors:
R E Sabbagha; J Minogue; R K Tamura; S A Hungerford
Related Documents :
9784639 - A case of congenital familial short femur diagnosed prenatally.
12100419 - Prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound: the contribution of additional examiners.
9014279 - A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies co...
8610759 - Ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth: comparison between human and ovine fetus.
21621759 - Automatic identification of fetal breathing movements in fetal rr interval time series.
7315909 - Growth of the ultrasound fetal femur length during normal pregnancy. part i.
1700349 - Elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein after mu...
1381469 - Lower birth weight of offspring born after self-poisoning of parent.
3073169 - The importance of baro- and chemoreflexes in the control of the fetal cardiovascular sy...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of obstetrics and gynecology     Volume:  160     ISSN:  0002-9378     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.     Publication Date:  1989 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1989-05-31     Completed Date:  1989-05-31     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370476     Medline TA:  Am J Obstet Gynecol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  854-60; discussion 860-2     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Birth Weight*
Embryonic and Fetal Development
Female
Fetus / anatomy & histology*
Gestational Age*
Humans
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Statistics as Topic
Ultrasonography*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;162(5):1351   [PMID:  2187361 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Accuracy of total bladder volume and residual urine measurements: comparison between real-time ultra...
Next Document:  Fetal vascular responses to prostacyclin.