| Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired? | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 17449851 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
|
Authors:
|
Richard A Ehrenkranz |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Comment; Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition Volume: 92 ISSN: 1359-2998 ISO Abbreviation: Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. Publication Date: 2007 May |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2007-04-23 Completed Date: 2007-05-22 Revised Date: 2013-06-06 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9501297 Medline TA: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: F161-2 Citation Subset: AIM; IM |
Affiliation:
|
Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208064, New Haven, CT 06520-8064. richard.ehrenkranz@yale.edu. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Birth Weight
/
physiology* Female Fetal Growth Retardation / diagnosis* Fetal Weight / physiology* Gestational Age Humans Male Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis / standards Reference Values |
| Comments/Corrections | |
Comment On:
|
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 May;92(3):F189-92
[PMID:
16547077
]
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Identification of secretory granule phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-interacting proteins using...
Next Document: Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal-tract abnormaliti...