Document Detail


Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17449851     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Authors:
Richard A Ehrenkranz
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comment; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition     Volume:  92     ISSN:  1359-2998     ISO Abbreviation:  Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.     Publication Date:  2007 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-04-23     Completed Date:  2007-05-22     Revised Date:  2013-06-06    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9501297     Medline TA:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  F161-2     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208064, New Haven, CT 06520-8064. richard.ehrenkranz@yale.edu.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Birth Weight / physiology*
Female
Fetal Growth Retardation / diagnosis*
Fetal Weight / physiology*
Gestational Age
Humans
Male
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis / standards
Reference Values
Comments/Corrections
Comment On:
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 May;92(3):F189-92   [PMID:  16547077 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Identification of secretory granule phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-interacting proteins using...
Next Document:  Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal-tract abnormaliti...