Document Detail


Esophagography After Pneumomediastinum Without CT Findings of Esophageal Perforation: Is It Necessary?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24147467     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the necessity of fluoroscopic esophagography in patients with pneumomediastinum on CT but without CT findings of esophageal perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2010, there were 4305 fluoroscopic esophagography examinations including 533 with CT identified from a search of our PACS. Patients with pneumomediastinum on CT who were subsequently referred for emergent fluoroscopic esophagography to exclude esophageal perforation were enrolled. Fluoroscopic esophagography examinations performed within 3 days of CT were included. Patients with a history of esophageal disease were excluded. As a result, 103 patients were enrolled in the study; patients were divided into groups on the basis of whether there was additional clinical history of esophageal damage (trauma group) or not (nontrauma group). Images were reviewed by two board-certified radiologists blinded to the clinical data and radiologic reports for the presence or absence of esophageal perforation. A positive result on CT was defined as esophageal injury or periesophageal infiltration that coexisted with periesophageal air. A positive fluoroscopic esophagography result was defined as oral contrast medium leakage from the esophagus. RESULTS. Esophageal perforation was diagnosed in 15 of the 103 patients. The CT findings were significantly correlated with esophageal perforation (p < 0.001 in the trauma group, and p = 0.001 in the nontrauma group). The respective sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of CT versus fluoroscopic esophagography in the trauma group were 100% versus 66.7% and 100% versus 87.9%; in the nontrauma group, the sensitivity and NPV were 100% for CT and fluoroscopic esophagography. Thus, the sensitivity and NPV of CT were either superior or equal to those of fluoroscopic esophagography. CONCLUSION. The results of our study suggest that performing fluoroscopic esophagography in patients with pneumomediastinum is unnecessary when CT is negative for esophageal perforation.
Authors:
Cheng-Hsien Wu; Chien-Ming Chen; Chien-Cheng Chen; Yon-Cheong Wong; Chao-Jan Wang; Wan-Chak Lo; Li-Jen Wang
Related Documents :
24268667 - Sacral rib: an uncommon congenital anomaly.
24809317 - Assessment of tumor grade and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer: whole-volume perfusion...
22955547 - Discrimination and anatomical mapping of pet-positive lesions: comparison of ct attenua...
20882607 - Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants.
11335097 - Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: detection and staging with dynamic mr imaging.
19122507 - Confocal endomicroscopy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  201     ISSN:  1546-3141     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  2013 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-10-23     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  977-84     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
1 Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Division of Emergency and Critical Care Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, 5 Fu-Hsing St, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  High-Pitch ECG-Synchronized Pulmonary CT Angiography Versus Standard CT Pulmonary Angiography: A Pro...
Next Document:  Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer by preoperative CT.