Document Detail


Energy efficiency of conventional, organic, and alternative cropping systems for food and fuel at a site in the U.S. Midwest.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20402534     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The prospect of biofuel production on a large scale has focused attention on energy efficiencies associated with different agricultural systems and production goals. We used 17 years of detailed data on agricultural practices and yields to calculate an energy balance for different cropping systems under both food and fuel scenarios. We compared four grain and one forage systems in the U.S. Midwest: corn (Zea mays) - soybean (Glycine max) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotations managed with (1) conventional tillage, (2) no till, (3) low chemical input, and (4) biologically based (organic) practices, and (5) continuous alfalfa (Medicago sativa). We compared energy balances under two scenarios: all harvestable biomass used for food versus all harvestable biomass used for biofuel production. Among the annual grain crops, average energy costs of farming for the different systems ranged from 4.8 GJ ha(-1) y(-1) for the organic system to 7.1 GJ ha(-1) y(-1) for the conventional; the no-till system was also low at 4.9 GJ ha(-1) y(-1) and the low-chemical input system intermediate (5.2 GJ ha(-1) y(-1)). For each system, the average energy output for food was always greater than that for fuel. Overall energy efficiencies ranged from output:input ratios of 10 to 16 for conventional and no-till food production and from 7 to 11 for conventional and no-till fuel production, respectively. Alfalfa for fuel production had an efficiency similar to that of no-till grain production for fuel. Our analysis points to a more energetically efficient use of cropland for food than for fuel production and large differences in efficiencies attributable to management, which suggests multiple opportunities for improvement.
Authors:
Ilya Gelfand; Sieglinde S Snapp; G Philip Robertson
Related Documents :
7985624 - Underestimation of energy intake by 3-d records compared with energy intake to maintain...
9829604 - Interrelationship between circulating leptin concentrations, hunger, and energy intake ...
18086874 - Is a failure to recognize an increase in food intake a key to understanding insulin-ind...
3593664 - Food intake and energy expenditure of nigerian female students.
639544 - Biokinetic aspects of tissue-bound tritium in algae.
3698264 - Dry- and wet-ashing techniques compared in analyses for zinc, copper, manganese, and ir...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Environmental science & technology     Volume:  44     ISSN:  0013-936X     ISO Abbreviation:  Environ. Sci. Technol.     Publication Date:  2010 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-13     Completed Date:  2010-07-08     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0213155     Medline TA:  Environ Sci Technol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  4006-11     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, Michigan 49060, USA. igelfand@msu.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Crops, Agricultural*
Electric Power Supplies*
Food*
Midwestern United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Competitive Substituent Effects on the Reactivity of Aromatic Rings.
Next Document:  Polymorphic Transformation of Isotactic Poly(1-butene) in Form III upon Heating: In Situ Synchrotron...