|Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of intrathoracic lymph node metastases from extrathoracic malignancies.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 23196318 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|Intrathoracic lymph node enlargement is a common finding in patients with extrathoracic malignancies. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a technique that is commonly used for lung cancer diagnosis and staging but that has not been widely investigated for the diagnosis of enlarged mediastinal and lobar lymph nodes in patients with extrathoracic malignancies. We conducted a retrospective study of 117 patients with extrathoracic malignancies who underwent EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis of intrathoracic lymph node enlargement from October 2005 to December 2009 and compared the EBUS-TBNA findings with the final diagnoses. EBUS-TBNA diagnosed mediastinal metastases in 51 of the 117 (43.6 %) cases and gave an alternate diagnosis or ruled out the presence of malignancy in 35 (56.4 %). Fourteen of these 35 patients underwent further surgical investigation, while the remaining 21 had clinical and radiological follow-up for 18 months. No false negatives were found in the surgery group. In the follow-up group, 13 patients had stable or regressive lymphadenopathy, and eight developed clinicoradiological progression and were assumed to have been false negatives by EBUS-TBNA. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA were 86.4 and 75 %, respectively. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) was performed in 80.4 % of the samples obtained by EBUS-TBNA. In samples obtained from ten patients with metastatic breast cancer, estrogen receptor expression was successfully assessed in eight patients and progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in four. EBUS-TBNA is an accurate procedure for the diagnosis of thoracic lymph node metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancies and should be an initial diagnostic tool in these patients. Furthermore, EBUS-TBNA can obtain high-quality specimens from metastatic lymph nodes for use in molecular analyses.|
|Jose Sanz-Santos; Beatriz Cirauqui; Estefania Sanchez; Felipe Andreo; Pere Serra; Eduard Monso; Eva Castellà; Mariona Llatjós; Miguel Mesa; Juan Ruiz-Manzano; Rafael Rosell|
Related Documents :
|24393238 - Characterization of pulmonary cysts in birt-hogg-dubé syndrome: histopathologic and mo...
25039808 - Igg4 positive mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma of the orbit - lesson of the m...
19755908 - A revaluation of folliculosebaceous cystic hamartoma: the histopathological and immunoh...
25118488 - Is he4 a useful endometrioma marker?
10437378 - Image-guided procedures in brain biopsy.
23671968 - Significance of adenosine deaminase in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion.
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2012-11-30|
|Title: Clinical & experimental metastasis Volume: 30 ISSN: 1573-7276 ISO Abbreviation: Clin. Exp. Metastasis Publication Date: 2013 Apr|
|Created Date: 2013-04-04 Completed Date: 2013-06-11 Revised Date: 2013-07-11|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 8409970 Medline TA: Clin Exp Metastasis Country: Netherlands|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 521-8 Citation Subset: IM|
|Pulmonology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Lymphatic Diseases / diagnosis*, etiology
Neoplasms / complications*
Thoracic Neoplasms / diagnosis*, etiology
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Clin Exp Metastasis
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Clin. Exp. Metastasis
Publisher: Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
© The Author(s) 2012
Received Day: 1 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 15 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 30 Month: 11 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 30 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 4 Year: 2013
Volume: 30 Issue: 4
First Page: 521 Last Page: 528
PubMed Id: 23196318
Publisher Id: 9556
|Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of intrathoracic lymph node metastases from extrathoracic malignancies|
Address: +34-93-497-89-20 +34-93-497-88-04 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
Pulmonology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain
Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
Ciber de enfermedades respiratorias CiBeRes, Bunyola, Spain
Pulmonology Department, Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain
Pathology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Dexeus University Institute, Barcelona, Spain
Bronchoscopy Unit, Pulmonology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet, s/n, 08916 Badalona, Spain
Intrathoracic hilar and/or mediastinal nodal enlargement in patients with concurrent or previously diagnosed extrathoracic malignancies is a common finding both by computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). Nodal enlargement can be found at the time of the initial diagnosis, which may affect staging and therefore be crucial for the choice of treatment, or it may be identified during or after the course of a radical treatment, which may imply a disease relapse. In addition, nodal enlargement may be from a primary intrathoracic malignancy, such as lung cancer, which will require a change in treatment. In all these situations, intrathoracic nodal enlargement requires pathologic confirmation and generally represents a challenge for the clinician.
For many years, mediastinoscopy was the only diagnostic procedure for mediastinal lymphadenopathy. However, this surgical technique requires general anesthesia and is not the most suitable for patients undergoing chemotherapy. Over the last years, endoscopy ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has proven to be an alternative to surgery for sampling mediastinal nodes in these patients [1, 2], but it cannot reach all the nodal stations.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a relatively novel technique whose usefulness in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer  is widely recognized. However, few studies have focused on the use of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of intrathoracic lymph node metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancies [4–7]. Furthermore, although EBUS-TBNA has been used successfully to collect samples for molecular analyses in lung cancer patients , only one single study has reported the feasibility of EBUS-TBNA to obtain samples from metastatic extrathoracic malignancies that allow the performance of molecular analyses .
We have retrospectively assessed the value of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancies. In addition, we have examined the feasibility of obtaining sufficient high-quality tissue samples with EBUS-TBNA for ancillary molecular analyses which can provide additional diagnostic information for these patients.
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical files of all patients with a concurrent or a previously diagnosed extrathoracic malignancy who were referred to our institution for EBUS-TBNA because of suspected intrathoracic nodal metastases from October 2005 to December 2009. The clinical suspicion of metastases was based on nodal enlargement (short axis > 10 mm) on CT (with or without lung lesions)  and/or on 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake on PET-CT in all cases. Patients with a previous or concurrent pathologic diagnosis of intrathoracic malignancy previously to the performance of EBUS-TBNA were not included in the study.
EBUS-TBNA was performed in an outpatient setting using a flexible bronchoscope (BF-UC160F-OL8, Olympus Optical Co Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a distal probe capable of producing linear parallel scans of the mediastinal and peribronchial tissues and a working channel suited to the performance of TBNA under direct ultrasound guidance. Local anesthesia and conscious sedation were achieved using topical lidocaine spray and intravenous midazolam, respectively . Mediastinal and lobar nodes with a short-axis diameter of ≥5 mm identified during the procedure were sampled under direct ultrasound visualization with a 22-gauge cytology needle specially designed for EBUS-TBNA (NA-201SX-4022, Olympus Optical Co Ltd.).
The aspirates were recovered and placed on slides, fixed with 95 % ethanol and stained with haematoxylin for rapid on-site evaluation by a cytopathologist. An immediate assessment was given after each pass. Nodes were classified as “normal tissue negative for malignancy” when the sample contained 40 lymphocytes per high-power field in cellular areas of the smear and/or clusters of pigmented macrophages and contained no neoplastic cells or as “metastatic” when recognizable groups of malignant cells were present . After this immediate assessment, Papanicolaou staining was completed in the laboratory. Whenever the cytopathologist considered it to be necessary, additional material was obtained and processed as cell blocks for ancillary studies. Cell blocks were prepared by air-drying the slides to clot and scraping them into 10 % formalin for subsequent processing in the laboratory. Blocks were embedded in paraffin and sectioned (5 μm thickness). Routine haematoxylin–eosin staining was used on cell-block sections, and IHC was used whenever this was needed for tumor origin identification.
In patients with metastatic breast cancer the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (pgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was analyzed in EBUS-TBNA recovered material. ER and PgR were evaluated using IHC with the anti-estrogen receptor antibody 6F11 and the anti-progesterone receptor antibody 5D10 respectively (Novocastra, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England). The threshold values for reporting positivity were 1 % of tumor cells . For HER2, staining was performed using Herceptest (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA), and positive cases were confirmed by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; Vysis PathVysion, Downers Grove, IL, USA).
When EBUS-TBNA findings were positive for malignancy, they were assumed to be true positives and no further tissue confirmation was requested. Patients in whom EBUS-TBNA did not unequivocally show the presence of malignancy or an alternate benign diagnosis were referred for additional investigations including mediastinoscopy or thoracotomy to obtain a reference pathology result. Clinical and radiological follow-up for at least 18 months was used if the clinician judged this was sufficient. No patients were lost to follow-up.
Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and as means and standard deviations (SD) or as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), for continuous variables. Specificity and positive predictive value were assumed to be 100 %. Sensitivity (number of true positives/number of true positives + number of false negatives), negative predictive value (NPV; number of true negatives/number of true negatives + number of false negatives) and accuracy (number of true positives + number of true negatives/number of true positives + number of false positives + number of true negatives + number of false negatives) were calculated for the diagnosis of intrathoracic nodal metastases from extrathoracic malignancies.
One hundred and seventeen patients were reviewed. Table 1 shows the patient characteristics. Head and neck, colorectal, breast and prostate carcinoma represented 60 % of the malignancies included. Figure 1 shows the disposition of patients by EBUS-TBNA findings and follow-up.
EBUS-TBNA identified intrathoracic nodal metastases from an extrathoracic malignancy in 51 (43.5 %) cases, a primary intrathoracic malignancy with lymph node involvement in 27 (23 %) cases (26 lung cancer, 1 lymphoma), and an alternative benign diagnosis in four (3.4 %) cases (2 sarcoidosis, 2 sarcoid-like reaction—non-caseating granulomatous inflammation, clinically inconsistent with sarcoidosis, with fungal and mycobacterial negative cultures) (Fig. 1). For all these patients, no histological confirmation was requested. In the two patients with sarcoid-like reaction, clinical and radiological follow-up was carried out to confirm or rule out a possible tumor as the cause . After 6 months, one of these two patients developed a lymphoma.
EBUS-TBNA found normal lymph node tissue in 35 (29.9 %) patients, 14 (11.9 %) of whom underwent surgery to obtain a reference pathology result. Seven (6 %) of these patients had lung cancer without nodal involvement, four (3.4 %) had a lung metastasis from an extrathoracic malignancy without nodal involvement, and in the remaining three patients an alternative benign diagnosis was established (one case of silicosis and two cases of nodal tuberculosis). These three cases that have a diagnosis of normal lymph node tissue established with EBUS-TBNA but an alternative benign disease after surgery, although considered as true negatives for malignancy, were not included in the analysis of NPV. No false negatives were found among the 14 patients who underwent surgery (Fig. 1).
The remaining 21 (17.9 %) patients with neither an unequivocal diagnosis of metastases nor an alternate diagnosis underwent clinical and radiological follow-up for at least 18 months. In 13 (11.1 %) of these patients, stable or regressive lymphadenopathy, consistent with a benign diagnosis, was confirmed. In eight (6.8 %) of these patients, radiological follow-up found mediastinal and/or pulmonary progression, and the EBUS-TBNA findings were categorized as false negatives (Fig. 1). Most of these patients had thoracic progression, including nodal enlargement and/or multiple pulmonary nodes or masses, or extrathoracic metastases, including abdominal or intracranial metastases, and due to ethical reasons or because the patients rejected surgery, no histological confirmation was requested. Table 2 shows the final diagnoses for all 117 patients.
The sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of nodal metastases from extrathoracic malignancies were 86.4 % (51/51 + 8), 75 % (24/24 + 8) and 90.3 % (51 + 24/51 + 0 + 24 + 8) respectively. No complications appeared during the EBUS-TBNA procedure or in the 2 weeks following the procedure.
Among the 51 patients in whom EBUS-TBNA found lymph node metastases (Table 3), colorectal and breast carcinoma were the most frequent primary malignancies (10 [19.6 %] patients each). Thirty-one (60.7 %) patients showed nodal enlargement on EBUS, and 91 % of the patients having a PET-CT showed high FDG avidity. Half of the patients had extrathoracic spread. Twenty-nine patients (56.8 %) had a median disease-free status of 58 months (IQR, 45–112) from diagnosis of the primary malignancy. Five had had a previous pulmonary metastasectomy, with a mean time of 29 months from surgery. Eleven (21.6 %) patients presented with a single mass or nodule on CT scans and could thus have been candidates for metastasectomy, but surgery was ruled out based on the EBUS-TBNA findings.
Cell blocks were obtained from 47 (92 %) of the 51 patients with lymph node metastases diagnosed by EBUS, and IHC was performed in 41 (80.5 %) (Figs. 2, 3). IHC was not considered necessary for the diagnosis in three (5.8 %) patients who had had pharyngeal or laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and seven (13.7 %) additional patients with different malignancies since the recovered material was morphologically consistent with the previously diagnosed extrathoracic malignancy.
In the ten patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, ER expression was assessed in eight cases and PgR and HER2 in four. PgR status had changed in only one patient, while ER and HER2 status showed no change.
Our study confirms that EBUS-TBNA can diagnose thoracic lymph node metastases from extrathoracic malignancies with sensitivity and NPV similar to those of the two previous major studies [4, 5] and to findings in lung cancer staging . Moreover, in our cohort of 117 patients, implementation of EBUS-TBNA obviated invasive surgical diagnostic procedures in nearly three quarters of the patients and allowed IHC and additional molecular analysis to be performed in more than 80 % of the cases.
In recent years, the development of novel therapies in cancer has led to an improvement in overall survival time . Cancer patients are now given periodic medical controls, and the detection of thoracic lymphadenopathy in patients with extrathoracic malignancies is no longer uncommon . This progress has been accompanied by a parallel advance in minimally invasive techniques, such as EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA, which have proven to be a viable alternative to mediastinoscopy. However, mediastinoscopy requires general anesthesia, increasing both costs and patient risk [17, 18]. Several studies [1, 2] have evaluated the use EUS-FNA as a substitute for mediastinoscopy. In a retrospective series of 75 patients, EUS-FNA had a sensitivity of 86 % and NPV of 72 % , and in a short prospective study of 20 patients, the sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 68 % . However, compared to EUS-FNA, EBUS-TBNA has the advantage of its bilateral hilar and mediastinal reach while EUS-FNA reaches only the left paratracheal, aorto-pulmonary window, subcarinal and paraesophageal mediastinal lymph node stations. In our series, ten (21.6 %) hilar and 18 (35.3 %) right paratracheal metastatic nodes would have been inaccessible by EUS-FNA.
EBUS-TBNA has long been used for diagnosing and staging lung cancer, but now there is a wealth of evidence to suggest that it has other uses . Several studies have focused on the use of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis , but few have used it specifically for the detection of thoracic nodal metastases from extrathoracic malignancies [4–7]. In a retrospective series of 92 patients, EBUS-TBNA had a sensitivity of 85 % and a NPV of 76 % , and a similar study of 161 patients reported a sensitivity of 87 % and a NPV of 73 % . In the present study, sensitivity and NPV were 86.4 and 75 %, respectively, which is similar to these two previous studies [4, 5]. The NPV of 75 % reported in this and in previous studies, however, justifies the referral of patients with neither an unequivocal diagnosis of malignancy nor an alternative diagnosis for additional tests, which may include mediastinoscopy.
Of the 44 patients with a single node mass or nodule on CT scans who were candidates for surgery, intrathoracic lymph node metastases from an extrathoracic malignancy were detected by EBUS in 11 (25 %), and surgery was ruled out for these patients based on the EBUS-TBNA findings. As the likelihood of a curative treatment after a metastasectomy depends on lymph node involvement, the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommends excluding patients with lymph node metastases from pulmonary metastasectomy with intent to cure. The incidence of lymph node involvement in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy is estimated to be around 20 % . The use of mediastinoscopy for selecting patients for surgery is unusual , and only one study  has examined the usefulness of mediastinoscopy in patients with lung metastases eligible for surgery; lymph node metastases were found in 10 % of the patients. In this clinical setting, EBUS-TBNA is thus a preferable approach, and the present study demonstrates the capabilities of EBUS-TBNA for the accurate selection of patients for therapeutic metastasectomy, as had been suggested by preliminary studies .
The present study has confirmed the ability of EBUS-TBNA to obtain high-quality specimens for ancillary studies, such as IHC and molecular analyses. In fact, IHC was performed in 80.4 % of the 51 patients diagnosed with mediastinal lymph node metastases. Molecular analysis is commonly used in samples obtained by EBUS-TBNA from patients with lung cancer, where they have been used to distinguish different types of non-small-cell lung cancer [25, 26] and to detect epidermal growth factor mutations  and the EML4-ALK fusion gene . In the present study, among ten patients with metastatic breast cancer, it was possible to analyze ER expression in eight patients and PgR and HER2 expression in four. Since ER, PgR and HER2 expression levels can change in metastatic lesions in patients with breast cancer  and lead to drug resistance, a biopsy of suspected metastatic lesions is recommended in these patients for the analysis of ER, PgR and HER2 expression [29, 30]. The present study confirms that EBUS-TBNA is a feasible minimally invasive method for obtaining samples for these molecular analyses.
There are a number of limitations in this study. Firstly, the fact that it is a retrospective study implies a certain selection bias. Secondly, no histological confirmation was obtained for cases diagnosed as negative by EBUS-TBNA, including those cases identified as false negatives during clinical and radiological follow-up. A prospective study with well-defined criteria for inclusion and histological confirmation could overcome both these limitations.
In conclusion, EBUS-TBNA is a simple, safe and accurate procedure for the diagnosis of thoracic lymph node metastases in patients with a concurrent or previously diagnosed extrathoracic malignancy. Our findings lead us to recommend the use of EBUS-TBNA as an initial diagnostic technique in these patients. Furthermore, EBUS-TBNA can obtain high quality specimens from metastatic lymph nodes for use in molecular analyses.
The authors would like to thank Ms Renée Grupp Meissner for her assistance in drafting the manuscript.
Funded partially by FUCAP (Catalan Foundation for Pulmonology), FIS 0901612 and Ciberes-Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias.
|1..||Peric R,Schuurbiers OCJ,Veseliç M,Rabe KF,Van der Heijden M,Annema JT. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the mediastinal staging of extrathoracic tumors: a new perspectiveAnn OncolYear: 2010211468147110.1093/annonc/mdp57820028722|
|2..||Kramer H,Koëter GH,Sleijfer DT,van Putten JW,Groen HJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal abnormalities and previous extrathoracic malignancyEur J CancerYear: 20044055956210.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.01014962723|
|3..||Adams K,Shah PL,Edmonds L,Lim E. Test performance of endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy for mediastinal staging in patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysisThoraxYear: 20096475776210.1136/thx.2008.10986819454408|
|4..||Navani N,Nankivell M,Woolhouse I,Harrison RN,Munavar M,Oltmanns U,Falzon M,Kocjan G,Rintoul R,Janes S. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in patients with extrathoracic malignancy. A multicenter studyJ Thorac OncolYear: 201161505150910.1097/JTO.0b013e318223c3fe21792077|
|5..||Tournoy KG,Govaerts E,Malfait T,Dooms C. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy for M1 staging of extrathoracic malignanciesAnn OncolYear: 20112212713110.1093/annonc/mdq31120603434|
|6..||Park J,Jan SJ,Park YS,Oh YM,Shim TS,Kime WS,Choi CM. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy for diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with extrathoracic malignancyJ Korean Med SciYear: 201126275278|
|7..||Song JU,Parch HY,Jeon K,Koh WJ,Suh GY,Chung MP,Kim H,Kwon OJ,Um SW. The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastates in patients with extrapulmonary malignancyIntern MedYear: 2011502525253210.2169/internalmedicine.50.583422041352|
|8..||Sakairi Y,Nakajima T,Yasufuku K,Ikebe D,Kageyama H,Soda M,Takeuchi K,Itami M,Yoshino I,Mano H,Kimura H. EML4-ALK fusion gene assessment using metastatic lymph node samples obtained by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirationClin Cancer ResYear: 2010164938494510.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-009920926401|
|9..||Jennings BR,Millward M,Amanuel B,Mulrennan S,Joosten SA,Phillips MJ. Role of endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosis and molecular assessment of metastatic melanomaRespirologyYear: 201217699199610.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02203.x22617000|
|10..||Colice GL,Chest CT. for known or suspected lung cancerChestYear: 199410613815010.1378/chest.106.5.1538|
|11..||British Thoracic Society guidelines on diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Thorax 2001;56(suppl 1):1–21|
|12..||Alsharif M,Andrade RS,Groth S,Stelow EB,Pambuccian SE. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration. The University of Minnesota experience, with emphasis on usefulness, adequacy assessment, and diagnostic difficultiesAm J Clin PatholYear: 200813043444310.1309/BLLQF8KDHWW6MJNQ18701418|
|13..||Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Wolff AC, Mangu PB, Temin S. American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 2010;6:195–7.)|
|14..||Brincker H. Sarcoid reaction in malignant tumoursCancer Treat RevYear: 19861314715610.1016/0305-7372(86)90002-23536088|
|15..||Gondos A,Bray F,Brewster DH,Coebergh JWW,Hakulinen T,Janssen-Heijnen MLG,Kurtinaitis J,Brenner H. EUNICE Survival Working Group. Recent trends in cancer survival across Europe between 2000 and 2004: A model-based period analysis from 12 cancer registriesEur J CancerYear: 2008441463147510.1016/j.ejca.2008.03.01018455387|
|16..||McLoud TC,Kalisher S,Stark P,Greene R. Intrathoracic lymph node metastases from extrathoracic neoplasmsAm J RoentgenolYear: 197813140340710.2214/ajr.131.3.40398980|
|17..||Sharples LD, Jackson C, Wheaton E, Griffith G, Annema JT, Dooms C, Tournoy KG, Deschepper E, Hughes V, Magee L, Buxton M, Rintoul RC. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound relative to surgical staging in potentially resectable lung cancer: results from the ASTER randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess; 2012;16(18):1–75, iii-iv|
|18..||Steinfort DP,Liev D,Conron M,Hutchinson AF,Irving LB. Cost-benefit of minimally invasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a decision tree sensitivity analysisJ Thorac OncolYear: 20105101564157010.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e8b2e620871261|
|19..||Garcia-Olive I,Valverde Forcada EX,Andreo Garcia F,Sanz-Santos J,Castellà E,Llatjós M,Astudillo J,Monso E. Linear endobronchial ultrasound as the initial diagnostic tool in patients with indications of mediastinal diseaseArch BronconeumolYear: 20094526627010.1016/j.arbres.2008.10.00319376629|
|20..||Garwood S,Judson MA,Silvestri G,Hoda R,Fraig M,Doelken P. Endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosisChestYear: 20071321298130410.1378/chest.07-099817890467|
|21..||García-Yuste M,Cassivi S,Paleru C. Thoracic lymphatic involvement in patients having pulmonary metastasectomy. Incidence and effect on prognosisJ Thorac OncolYear: 20105S166S16910.1097/JTO.0b013e3181dcf92020502255|
|22..||Internullo E,Cassivi SD,Van Raemdonk D,Friedel G,Treasure T. Pulmonary metastasectomy: a survey of current practice amongst member of the European Society of Thoracic SurgeonsJ Thorac OncolYear: 200831257126610.1097/JTO.0b013e31818bd9da18978560|
|23..||Menon A,Milton R,Thorpe JA,Papagiannopoulos K. The value of video-assisted mediastinoscopy in pulmonary metastasectomyEur J Cardiothorac SurgYear: 20073235135410.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.03117524660|
|24..||Nakajima T,Yasufuku K,Iyoda A,Yoshida S,Suzuki M,Sekine Y,Shibuya K,Hiroshima K,Nakatani Y,Fujisawa T. The evalutation of lymph node metastasis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: crucial for selection of surgical candidates with metastatic lung tumorsJ Thorac Cardiovasc SurgYear: 20071341485149010.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.02218023670|
|25..||Wallace WAH,Rassi DM. Accuracy of cell typing in non-small cell lung cancer by EBUS/EUS FNA cytology samplesEur Respir JYear: 20113891191710.1183/09031936.0017641021406513|
|26..||Sanz-Santos J,Serra P,Andreo F,Llatjós M,Castellà E,Monsó E. Contribution of cell blocks obtained through endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration to the diagnosis of lung cancerBMC CancerYear: 2012123410.1186/1471-2407-12-3422264305|
|27..||Garcia-Olivé I,Monsó E,Andreo F,Sanz-Santos J,Taron M,Molina-Vila MA,Llatjos M,Castella E,Moran T,Bertran-Alamillo J,Mayo-de-Las-Casas C,Queralt C,Rosell R. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for identifying EGFR mutationsEur Respir JYear: 20103539139510.1183/09031936.0002810919643949|
|28..||Gutierrez MC,Detre S,Johnston S,Mohsin SK,Shou J,Allred DC,Schiff R,Osborne CK,Dowsett M. Molecular changes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: relationship between estrogen receptor, HER-2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinaseJ Clin OncolYear: 2005232469247610.1200/JCO.2005.01.17215753463|
|29..||National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. www.nccn.org|
|30..||Albanell J, Andreu X, Calasanz MJ, Concha A, Corominas JM, García-Caballero T, López JA, López-Rios F, Ramón y Cajal S, Vera-Sempere FJ, Colomer R, Martín M, Alba E, González-Martín A, Llombart A, Lluch A, Palacios J (2009) Guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer: a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). Clin Transl Oncol 11:363–75|
Patient characteristics (N = 117)
|Age (years), mean(SD)||65.3 (12.3)|
|Gender (male), n (%)||77 (66)|
|Extrathoracic malignancy n (%)|
|Head and neck carcinoma||21 (18)|
|Colorectal carcinoma||19 (16.4)|
|Breast carcinoma||18 (15.4)|
|Prostate carcinoma||12 (10.2)|
|Urothelial carcinoma||9 (7.7)|
|Renal carcinoma||7 (6)|
|Bladder carcinoma||5 (4.3)|
|Stomach carcinoma||4 (3.5)|
|Unknown origin carcinoma||4 (3.4)|
|Endometrial carcinoma||2 (1.7)|
|Thyroid carcinoma||2 (1.7)|
|Extrathoracic malignancy status|
|Previously diagnosed||65 (55.5)|
|During diagnosis||16 (13.7)|
|During treatment||36 (30.8)|
|Intrathoracic nodal enlargement without lung lesion||46 (39.3)|
|Intrathoracic nodal enlargement with solitary nodule/mass||44 (37.6)|
|Intrathoracic nodal enlargement with multiple nodules/masses||27 (23.1)|
* cervical, ovarian, pancreas, adrenal, testis, extrathoracic lymphoma
Final diagnosis of 117 patients with extrathoracic malignancy undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis of intrathoracic lymph node enlargement, n (%)
|Mediastinal nodal metastases from extrathoracic malignancy||59 (50.4)|
|Pulmonary metastases from extrathoracic malignancy without nodal involvement||4 (3.4)|
|Lung cancer||33 (28.2)|
|Benign lymph node disease|
|Normal lymph node tissue||13 (11.1)|
|Sarcoid-like reaction||2 (1.7)|
Characteristics of patients with intrathoracic nodal metastases from extrathoracic malignancies diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA (N = 51)
|Age (years), m (SD)||62.2 (13.2)|
|Gender (males)||27 (53)|
|Unknown origin carcinoma||4|
|Head and neck carcinoma||3|
|Extrathoracic malignancy status|
|Previously diagnosed||29 (56.9)|
|During diagnosis||17 (33.3)|
|During treatment||5 (9.8)|
|Location of malignant nodes|
|Upper right paratracheal||1 (2)|
|Lower left paratracheal||3 (5.9)|
|Lower right paratracheal||17 (33.3)|
|Characteristics of malignant nodes|
|FDG avidity**||9.5 ± 4.6|
|Size (short-axis diameter)***||11.9 (8.4−8)|
* one case each of bladder, cervical, endometrial, testis, ovarian, pancreatic and adrenal cancer
** In Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) (SD)
*** In mm (range)
Keywords: Keywords Endobronchial ultrasound, Transbronchial needle aspiration, EBUS-TBNA, Mediastinal lymph node metastases, Extrathoracic malignancy, Immunohistochemistry.
Previous Document: Gingival overgrowth and drug association: A review.
Next Document: Risk of recurrence in patients with pulmonary embolism: Predictive role of D-dimer and of residual p...