| End-of-Life Decision-Making in Canada: The Report by the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making. | |
| | |
| Jump to Full Text | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22085416 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
This report on end-of-life decision-making in Canada was produced by an international expert panel and commissioned by the Royal Society of Canada. It consists of five chapters. Chapter 1 reviews what is known about end-of-life care and opinions about assisted dying in Canada. Chapter 2 reviews the legal status quo in Canada with regard to various forms of assisted death. Chapter 3 reviews ethical issues pertaining to assisted death. The analysis is grounded in core values central to Canada's constitutional order. Chapter 4 reviews the experiences had in a number of jurisdictions that have decriminalized or recently reviewed assisted dying in some shape or form. Chapter 5 provides recommendations with regard to the provision of palliative care in Canada, as well as recommendations for reform with respect to the various forms of assisted death covered in this document. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Udo Schüklenk; Johannes J M VAN Delden; Jocelyn Downie; Sheila A M McLean; Ross Upshur; Daniel Weinstock |
Related Documents
:
|
21644436 - Pushing the boundaries of lawful assisted dying in the netherlands? existential sufferi... 20591036 - Role of distal protection devices. 21597086 - Euthanasia and common sense: a reply to garcia. 17518856 - Ethics, law, and commercial surrogacy: a call for uniformity. 11884856 - Are plastic surgery advertisements conforming to the ethical codes of the american soci... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Bioethics Volume: 25 Suppl 1 ISSN: 1467-8519 ISO Abbreviation: Bioethics Publication Date: 2011 Nov |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-11-17 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8704792 Medline TA: Bioethics Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1-73 Citation Subset: E; IM |
Copyright Information:
|
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Philosophy, Queen's University, Canada UMC Utrecht, Julius Center, The Netherlands Faculties of Law and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Canada University of Glasgow, UK Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Toronto, Canada Department of Philosophy, Université de Montréal, Canada. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
| Full Text | |
|
Journal Information Journal ID (nlm-ta): Bioethics Journal ID (publisher-id): bioe ISSN: 0269-9702 ISSN: 1467-8519 Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK |
Article Information Download PDF ![]() © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. open-access: Print publication date: Month: 11 Year: 2011 Volume: 25 Issue: Suppl 1 First Page: 1 Last Page: 4 ID: 3265521 PubMed Id: 22085416 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01939.x |
| End-of-Life Decision-Making in Canada: The Report by the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making | |
| Udo Schüklenk1 |
Role: Ontario Research Chair in Bioethics and Professor |
| Johannes J M Van Delden2 |
Role: Professor of Medical Ethics |
| Jocelyn Downie3 |
Role: Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy and Professor at the Faculties of Law and Medicine |
| Sheila A M Mclean4 |
Role: Emeritus Professor of Law and Ethics in Medicine |
| Ross Upshur5 |
Role: Canada Research Chair in Primary Care Research and is a Professor at the Department of Family and Community Medicine |
| Daniel Weinstock6 |
Role: Canada Research Chair in Ethics and Political Philosophy |
| Department of Philosophy, Queen's UniversityCanada |
|
| UMC Utrecht, Julius CenterThe Netherlands |
|
| Faculties of Law and Medicine, Dalhousie UniversityCanada |
|
| University of GlasgowUK |
|
| Department of Family and Community Medicine University of TorontoCanada |
|
| Department of Philosophy, Université de MontréalCanada |
|
| Correspondence: Address for correspondence: Prof. Udo Schüklenk, Department of Philosophy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7l 2G3, Canada. E-mail: udo.schuklenk@gmail.com Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
- Introductory Remarks and Objectives
- Terminology
- Outline
CHAPTER ONE: END-OF-LIFE CARE IN CANADA
- Introduction
- Canadian Experience at the End of Life
- Mortality and Life Expectancy Trends in Canada
- Location of Death
- Quality of and Access to Palliative Care
- Expanding the Range of Palliative Care
- Dementia
- Chronic Kidney Disease
- Congestive Heart Failure
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Disability
- Demographic Transition in Canada
- Aging
- Diversity
- First Nations
- Advance Directives and Substitute Decision-Making
- Sedation Practices
- Paediatric End of Life Care
- Attitudes of Canadians Toward Voluntary Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
- General Public
- Health Care Professionals
- Patients
- International Comparisons
- Conclusions
CHAPTER TWO: THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE
- Introduction
- Withholding and Withdrawal of Potentially Life-sustaining Treatment
- Relatively Clear and Uncontroversial
- Less Clear and More Controversial
- Very Unclear and Very Controversial
- Potentially Life-shortening Symptom Relief
- Somewhat Clear and Relatively Uncontroversial
- Terminal Sedation
- Very Unclear and Potentially Very Controversial
- Assisted Suicide
- Very Clear and Very Controversial
- Voluntary Euthanasia
- Very Clear and Very Controversial
- Conclusions
CHAPTER THREE: THE ETHICS OF END-OF-LIFE CARE
- Introduction
- Core Values
- Autonomy
- Moral and Legal Rights
- Autonomy and Assisted Death
- Limits to the Right to Medically Assisted Death
- No Inference from the Right to Refuse Treatment to the Right to Assisted Death
- A Priori Arguments: Suicide is not Choice-worthy
- A Priori Arguments: Suicide Offends against Human Dignity
- Arguments against the Legal Right to Assisted Death
- Medical Professionals
- Slippery Slopes and the Protection of the Vulnerable
- Conclusions
CHAPTER FOUR: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH LAWS ON ASSISTED DYING
- Introduction
- Mechanisms for Change to Law and/or Practice
- Judicial Decisions (Netherlands, Montana)
- Prosecutorial Charging Guidelines (Netherlands, United Kingdom)
- New or Revised Laws
- The Netherlands
- Belgium
- Luxemburg
- Oregon
- Washington State
- Evolution of Practice Without Legal Change (Switzerland)
- Elements of Regulated Permissive Regimes
- Practical Experience
- Data on Voluntary Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
- Netherlands
- Belgium
- Switzerland
- Oregon
- Washington State
- Slippery Slopes?
- Data on Voluntary Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
- Conclusions
CHAPTER FIVE: PROPOSALS FOR REFORM
- Introduction
- Withholding and Withdrawal of Potentially Life-sustaining Treatment
- Valid Refusals by Competent Adults (or Legally Authorized Substitute Decision-makers)
- Mature Minors
- Unilateral Withholding and Withdrawal
- Advance Directives
- Palliative Care
- Potentially Life-shortening Symptom Relief
- Terminal Sedation
- Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia
- Legal Mechanisms
- Criminal Code Reform
- Prosecutorial Charging Guidelines
- Diversion Programs
- Core Elements
- Assisted Suicide and/or Voluntary Euthanasia
- Features of the Person
- Features of the Decision
- Features of the Person's Condition
- Features of the Request for Assistance
- Features of the Provider
- Oversight and Control
- Legal Mechanisms
Article Categories:
Keywords: Canada, Royal Society report, end-of-life, quality of life, assisted dying, palliative care, death. |
|
Previous Document: Comparison of body mass index and triceps skinfold at 5?years and young adult body mass index, waist...
Next Document: Timing of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in women with moderate and severe obesity.
