Document Detail

Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15824446     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
During the last fifty years the dominant stance in experimental biology has been reductionism. For the most part, research programs were based on the notion that genes were in 'the driver's seat' controlling the developmental program and determining normalcy and disease (genetic reductionism and genetic determinism). Philosophers were the first to realize that the belief that the Mendelian genes were reduced to DNA molecules was questionable. Soon after these pronouncements, experimental data confirmed their misgivings. The optimism of molecular biologists, fueled by early success in tackling relatively simple problems, has now been tempered by the difficulties found when attempting to understand complex biological problems. Here, we analyse experimental data that illustrate the shortcomings of this sort of reductionism. We also examine the prevailing paradigm in cancer research, the somatic mutation theory (SMT), the premises of which are: (i) cancer is derived from a single somatic cell that has accumulated multiple DNA mutations; (ii) the default state of cell proliferation in metazoa is quiescence; and (iii) cancer is a disease of cell proliferation caused by mutations in genes that control proliferation and the cell cycle. We challenge the notion that cancer is a cellular problem caused by mutated genes by assessing data gathered both from within the reductionist paradigm and from an alternative view that regards carcinogenesis as a developmental process gone awry. This alternative view, explored under the name of the tissue organization field theory (TOFT), is based on premises that place cancer in a different hierarchical level of complexity from that proposed by the SMT, namely: (i) carcinogenesis represents a problem of tissue organization comparable to organogenesis, and (ii) proliferation is the default state of all cells. We propose that the organicist view, in which the TOFT is based, is a good starting point from which to explore emergent phenomena. However, new theoretical concepts are needed in order to grapple with the apparent circular causality of complex biological phenomena in development and carcinogenesis.
Ana M Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein
Related Documents :
12690006 - Reproductive factors and familial predisposition for breast cancer by age 50 years. a c...
17156576 - Mechanisms of serpin dysfunction in disease.
12204006 - Germline mutations of brca1 and brca2 in korean breast and/or ovarian cancer families.
16869736 - Polygenic inherited predisposition to breast cancer.
25446316 - Single-cell and multivariate approaches in genetic perturbation screens.
11179006 - Bone dysplasia sclerosteosis results from loss of the sost gene product, a novel cystin...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of biosciences     Volume:  30     ISSN:  0250-5991     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Biosci.     Publication Date:  2005 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-04-12     Completed Date:  2005-09-16     Revised Date:  2005-11-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8100809     Medline TA:  J Biosci     Country:  India    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  103-18     Citation Subset:  IM    
Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Cell Proliferation
Gene Expression Regulation
Models, Theoretical*
Neoplasms* / etiology,  genetics

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Genotype, phenotype and cancer: role of low penetrance genes and environment in tumour susceptibilit...
Next Document:  Language from a biological perspective.