Document Detail

Electrical stimulation as adjuvant treatment for chronic leg ulcers of different aetiology: an RCT.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24142074     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of an innovative electrical stimulation (ES) therapy as adjuvant treatment for chronic wounds of various aetiology, in terms of pain and ulcer healing. Method: Patients with chronic limb ulcers were enrolled for the study and randomised into the intervention or control group. The intervention group received conventional treatment plus ES therapy (FREMS; Lorenz Lifetech) while the control group received only conventional treatment. Each ES treatment cycle consisted of 12 sessions performed in 4 weeks (three sessions/week). All patients were treated until full wound healing occurred, or for a maximum of 9 ES cycles, with a 2-week rest between each cycle. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in the study and randomised into the two groups: the intervention group (n=30) and the control group (n=30). During follow-up, some patients terminated the protocol because they reached the ulcer closure before the maximum of 9 cycles. The analysis of the effect of ES on pain and ulcer healing was performed on all patients who underwent at least two consecutive clinical evaluations (two cycles), in order to reach a compatible sample size with the primary objective (one patient withdrew). In both groups, there was a significant reduction of pain compared with baseline (p < 0.05), starting from T6 visit in the first cycle. In particular, there was a significant reduction of pain in the intervention group compared with the control group after 14 days, and this reduction continued until the end of the second cycle. Similarly, there was a significant reduction of PUSH tool score in the intervention group compared with the control group after 14 days, and this reduction continued until the end of the second cycle. Conclusion: Data collected in this study support data in the literature. Analysis of longitudinal data analysed by simple models and complex models suggest that the ES therapy had a positive and significant effect on pain reduction (VAS) and on the improvement of ulcer healing process in terms of the PUSH tool total index compared with conventional treatment, and may have induced a significant acceleration of the wound-healing process. Declaration of interest: There were no external sources of funding for this trial. The authors have no financial, commercial or social conflicts of interest to declare regarding the article or its content.
C Magnoni; E Rossi; C Fiorentini; A Baggio; B Ferrari; G Alberto
Related Documents :
24534684 - Segmental stability in orthognathic surgery: hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactide osteoconduct...
8410004 - Chiari malformation in adults: relation of morphological aspects to clinical features a...
24160964 - Effectiveness of medial rectus advancement alone or in combination with resection or la...
12749784 - Recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma after trepanation and drainage.
10468244 - Etiology and incidence of brain dysfunction after cardiac surgery.
20513024 - Comparison of salvage and planned pharyngolaryngectomy with jejunal transfer for hypoph...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of wound care     Volume:  22     ISSN:  0969-0700     ISO Abbreviation:  J Wound Care     Publication Date:  2013 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-10-21     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9417080     Medline TA:  J Wound Care     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  525-33     Citation Subset:  N    
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Dermatology, Modena, Italy.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Wound care does dermatology's job.
Next Document:  Nurse-patient consultations in primary care: do patients disclose their concerns?