Document Detail


Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk pregnancies.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11982981     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcome after elective vs. ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous mid-trimester loss or early preterm birth. METHODS: This was a retrospective study comparing two management strategies in women with singleton pregnancies who had at least one previous spontaneous delivery at 16-33 weeks of gestation. One group was managed by the placement of an elective cerclage at 12-16 weeks and the other group had transvaginal ultrasound examinations of the cervix at 12-15+6, 16-19+6, and 20-23+6 weeks and cervical cerclage was carried out if the cervical length was 25 mm or less. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were examined, including 47 that were managed expectantly and 43 treated by elective cerclage. In the expectantly managed group, 59.6% (28/47) required a cervical cerclage. We excluded from further analysis three patients who were lost to follow-up and three because of fetal death or iatrogenic preterm delivery. Miscarriage or spontaneous delivery before 34 weeks' gestation occurred in 14.6% (6/41) of the elective cerclage group, compared with 20.9% (9/43) in the expectantly managed group (chi2 = 0.219, P = 0.640). CONCLUSION: In women at increased risk of spontaneous mid-trimester or early preterm delivery, a policy of sonographic surveillance followed by cervical cerclage in those with a short cervix reduces the need for surgical intervention without significantly increasing adverse pregnancy outcome.
Authors:
M S To; V Palaniappan; C Skentou; D Gibb; K H Nicolaides
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology     Volume:  19     ISSN:  0960-7692     ISO Abbreviation:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Publication Date:  2002 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-05-01     Completed Date:  2002-07-03     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9108340     Medline TA:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  475-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cerclage, Cervical / methods*
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Obstetric Labor, Premature / prevention & control*
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome*
Pregnancy, High-Risk*
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surgical Procedures, Elective
Ultrasonography, Prenatal / methods
Uterine Cervical Incompetence / surgery*,  ultrasonography*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Comparison of three-dimensional, two-dimensional and color Doppler ultrasound in predicting the pres...
Next Document:  Teaching invasive perinatal procedures: assessment of a high fidelity simulator-based curriculum.