Document Detail


Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11726845     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Liquid purgatives for cleansing before colonoscopy often are poorly tolerated. A sodium phosphate tablet has been developed to provide equivalent efficacy with better patient tolerance. These 2 studies compare the safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of the tablet (Visicol) to a polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in adults undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: Two identically designed, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter trials were performed. The primary efficacy variable was the overall quality of colon cleansing. Patient tolerance was assessed in terms of compliance with the dosing regimen. Safety assessments included recording of adverse events and changes in biochemical tests, electrocardiogram, and vital signs. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-five patients participated in the studies; 420 took sodium phosphate tablets and 425 took a PEG solution. The 2 methods of preparation were equivalent in the overall quality of colon cleansing, cleansing in the right colon, and the frequency of inadequate preparation. Overall cleansing was excellent or good in 84.3% of patients in the tablet group and in 76.7% in the PEG group. Patient compliance was greater in the tablet group. There were also significantly fewer GI side effects in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium phosphate tablets, compared with PEG solution, produce equivalent colon cleansing, are associated with fewer GI side effects, and are better tolerated by patients.
Authors:
D Kastenberg; R Chasen; C Choudhary; D Riff; S Steinberg; E Weiss; L Wruble
Related Documents :
11772245 - Irritable bowel syndrome: an update on therapeutic modalities.
8995945 - Clinical response to dietary fiber treatment of chronic constipation.
23409775 - The effect of depression on physician-patient communication among hispanic end-stage re...
23241145 - Managing injuries of the neck trial (mint): a randomised controlled trial of treatments...
15277295 - Hypnosis for pain relief in labour and childbirth: a systematic review.
12528605 - Comprehensive evaluation of cetirizine in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis:...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Clinical Trial, Phase III; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Gastrointestinal endoscopy     Volume:  54     ISSN:  0016-5107     ISO Abbreviation:  Gastrointest. Endosc.     Publication Date:  2001 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-11-29     Completed Date:  2002-01-10     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0010505     Medline TA:  Gastrointest Endosc     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  705-13     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Atrial Fibrillation / chemically induced
Colonic Diseases / diagnosis,  surgery
Colonoscopy / methods
Double-Blind Method
Female
Gastrointestinal Diseases / chemically induced
Humans
Irrigation / methods*
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphates / administration & dosage*,  adverse effects
Polyethylene Glycols / administration & dosage*,  adverse effects
Preoperative Care / methods*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Solutions
Tablets
Treatment Outcome
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Phosphates; 0/Polyethylene Glycols; 0/Solutions; 0/Tablets; 7632-05-5/sodium phosphate
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Oct;56(4):610-1; author reply 611   [PMID:  12297796 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Comparison of sphincter of Oddi manometry, fatty meal sonography, and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in ...
Next Document:  The utility of EUS and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in detecting celiac lymph node metastasis i...