Document Detail


Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10577637     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Few randomised controlled trials have sufficient power to show clear advantages of different designs of cervical-smear collection devices. We studied by systematic review whether the design of cervical-smear devices affects rates of inadequate smears and detection of disease and whether the presence of endocervical cells in the smear affects detection of disease. METHODS: We sought relevant randomised controlled trials by computer literature review by MEDLINE backed up by a manual search of 16 journals. Each trial was classified according to methodological quality criteria. Odds ratios were calculated where data allowed. FINDINGS: 34 randomised controlled trials investigating cervical Papanicolaou smear collection devices were identified. All 34 trials compared the ability of devices to collect endocervical cells, and 19 compared the ability of devices to detect dyskaryosis. Meta-analyses showed that compared with other collection devices, the Ayre's spatula is an ineffective device for collecting endocervical cells (for example, odds ratio for comparison of extended-tip spatulas vs Ayre's spatula 2.25 [95% CI 2.06-2.44]) and also gives a lower yield of dyskaryosis (odds ratio for comparison of extended-tip spatulas vs Ayre's spatula 1.21 [1.20-1.33]). Devices that effectively collect endocervical cells also detect a higher proportion of abnormal cytology than those that do not. INTERPRETATION: The widely used Ayre's spatula is the least effective device for cervical sampling and should be superseded by extended-tip spatulas for primary screening and investigation of women before and after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The presence of endocervical cells is a valid and convenient surrogate for the ability to detect dyskaryosis.
Authors:
P Martin-Hirsch; R Lilford; G Jarvis; H C Kitchener
Related Documents :
19139667 - Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
18048587 - Heritability of lumbar flexibility and the role of disc degeneration and body weight.
9259777 - Transforaminal and posterior decompressions of the lumbar spine. a comparative study of...
15457717 - Motion segment stiffness measured without physiological levels of axial compressive pre...
24180757 - Decadal trends in indian ocean ambient sound.
14680157 - Observation of the orbital angular momentum spectrum of a light beam.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Lancet     Volume:  354     ISSN:  0140-6736     ISO Abbreviation:  Lancet     Publication Date:  1999 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-12-10     Completed Date:  1999-12-10     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985213R     Medline TA:  Lancet     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1763-70     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / diagnosis
Equipment Design
Equipment and Supplies
Female
Humans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / diagnosis
Vaginal Smears / instrumentation*,  methods*
Comments/Corrections
Erratum In:
Lancet 2000 Jan 29;355(9201):414

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Troponin concentrations for stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes in relation to ...
Next Document:  Prevalence of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy: a cross-sectional study.