Document Detail

Effects of saxagliptin added to sub-maximal doses of metformin compared with uptitration of metformin in type 2 diabetes: the PROMPT study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23020253     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract Objective: The PROMPT study compared efficacy and tolerability of two treatment intensification strategies: adding saxagliptin or uptitrating metformin monotherapy, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycaemic control on a sub-maximal metformin dose. Research design and methods: In this double-blind, 24-week study, metformin-tolerant patients with T2D on metformin monotherapy were randomised to receive fixed-dose metformin 1500 mg/day, plus either add-on saxagliptin 5 mg/day (SAXA-MET) or a two-step metformin uptitration (MET-UP) to a maximum dose (2500 mg/day). Clinical trial registration: NCT01006590. Main outcome measures: Primary: absolute change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) (Week 24). Secondary: proportion of patients achieving a therapeutic glycaemic response (Week 24); change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (Week 24); safety and tolerability. Exploratory analyses comprised three patient-related questionnaires, including the validated 5-dimension Digestive Health Status Index (DHSI). Results: 286 patients were randomised: (SAXA-MET: 147; MET-UP: 139). Baseline mean (SD) HbA(1c): 7.71 (0.85; SAXA-MET); 7.80 (0.82; MET-UP). Adjusted mean reductions from baseline in HbA(1c) (Week 24): -0.47% (SAXA-MET); -0.38% (MET-UP); mean (95% CI) difference in treatment effect, -0.10% (-0.26, 0.07); p = 0.260. The proportion of patients (95% CI) achieving a therapeutic glycaemic response (HbA(1c) <7%): 43.8% (34.8, 49.6) (SAXA-MET) vs. 35.0% (29.0, 43.8) (MET-UP). Of the 5 DHSI domains, mean (95% CI) differences were observed for diarrhoea-predominant score (+0.8 [-2.5, 4.0] vs. +7.9 [4.6, 11.2]) and dysmotility score (-0.5 [-2.0, 1.0] vs. +1.9 [0.3, 3.4]), (SAXA-MET and MET-UP, respectively). The most common adverse event was diarrhoea: 6.1% (SAXA-MET) vs. 12.2% (MET-UP). Conclusions: In metformin-tolerant patients with T2D (inadequately controlled on sub-maximal metformin monotherapy), saxagliptin was well tolerated. Although HbA(1c) reduction was not significantly different between treatment groups, the lower occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the SAXA-MET group suggests that saxagliptin add-on treatment may be a suitable alternative treatment strategy to metformin uptitration.
Michel P Hermans; Tuncay Delibasi; Ian Farmer; Leif Lohm; Pierre Maheux; Piermarco Piatti; Elmas Malvolti; Silke Jörgens; Bernard Charbonnel
Related Documents :
24053743 - Depression in iraqi hemodialysis patients.
24999083 - Depression and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations among medicare beneficiaries ...
11211953 - Mini mental state examination in geriatric stroke patients. validity, differences betwe...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-10-1
Journal Detail:
Title:  Current medical research and opinion     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1473-4877     ISO Abbreviation:  Curr Med Res Opin     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-1     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0351014     Medline TA:  Curr Med Res Opin     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  A Review of the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Transmucosal Fentanyl Formulations.
Next Document:  Stoichiometric Effect on Electrical, Optical and Structural Properties of Composition Tunable In(x)G...