Document Detail


Effects of physically effective fiber on digestive processes and milk fat content in early lactating dairy cows fed total mixed rations.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16428635     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Data from recent research studies were analyzed quantitatively, and the random effect of experiment was assessed to define the physiological responses of dairy cows in early lactation to intake of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF). All studies were conducted with lactating Holstein cows (84.8 +/- 3.54 days in milk) in Latin square designs, and feeds were offered ad libitum as total mixed rations (TMR). The peNDF was estimated by 2 measurement techniques, the NDF content of TMR multiplied by amount of dry matter (DM) retained on a 1.18-mm screen (peNDF(> 1.18)) and NDF content of TMR multiplied by the proportion of DM retained by 19- and 8-mm Penn State Particle Separator screens (peNDF(> 8)). Other factors, including concentrations of NDF, forage NDF, non-fiber carbohydrates, the amount of digestible organic matter of forages (FDOM), and the intake of ruminally degradable starch (RDSI) from grain in the diet were also investigated. The studied animal response variables included feed intake, ruminal fermentation, chewing activity, fiber digestibility, and milk production and composition. The ruminal pH (day mean) in this study ranged from 5.30 to 6.59. Using peNDF(> 1.18) approach, the requirements for physically effective fiber in high-yielding dairy cows fed TMR in an ad libitum intake were estimated to be about 19% of ration DM or 4.1 kg/d or 0.6 kg/100 kg of body weight to maintain a ruminal pH of about 6.0. When peNDF was measured as peNDF(> 8), ruminal pH responded in a quadratic fashion but the confidence of estimation was lower (R(2) = 0.27) compared with the peNDF(> 1.18) approach (R(2) = 0.67). Results of these data analyses showed that peNDF(> 1.18) provided a satisfactory estimation of the mean ruminal pH (R(2) = 0.67) and NDF digestibility (R(2) = 0.56). Furthermore, peNDF(> 1.18) was poorly, although positively, correlated to daily chewing (R(2) = 0.17), and rumination (R(2) = 0.24) activity. On the other hand, results from these analyses showed that milk parameters are less sensitive to the effects of dietary peNDF than other variables, such as ruminal pH, chewing activity, and fiber digestibility. Dietary FDOM correlated positively (moderately) to ruminal pH (R(2) = 0.24), daily chewing (R(2) = 0.23), and rumination (R(2) = 0.29) activity, whereas the daily RDSI from grain correlated negatively to ruminal pH (R(2) = 0.55) and positively to total volatile fatty acids (R(2) = 0.27). Inclusion of FDOM and RDSI from grain along with peNDF(> 1.18) in the models that predict rumen pH further improved the accuracy of prediction. This approach appeared to further complement the concept of peNDF that does not account for differences in ruminal fermentability of feeds.
Authors:
Q Zebeli; M Tafaj; H Steingass; B Metzler; W Drochner
Related Documents :
12542175 - Effects of oscillating dietary protein on ruminal fermentation and site and extent of n...
8232725 - High ammonia diet: its effect on the glial fibrillary acidic protein (gfap).
9361215 - Modeling ruminal ph fluctuations: interactions between meal frequency and digestion rate.
3700275 - Effects of dietary nitrogen level and ileal antibiotic administration on digestion and ...
25112945 - Vitamin b deficiencies in a critically ill autistic child with a restricted diet.
2107215 - Effect of short-term beta blockade on serum lipid levels and on the interaction of ldl ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of dairy science     Volume:  89     ISSN:  1525-3198     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Dairy Sci.     Publication Date:  2006 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-01-23     Completed Date:  2006-05-05     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985126R     Medline TA:  J Dairy Sci     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  651-68     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
University of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Nutrition (450), Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany. zebeli@uni-hohenheim.de
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animal Feed
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Animals
Cattle / physiology*
Cereals / chemistry
Diet
Dietary Fiber / administration & dosage*,  metabolism
Digestion*
Fats / analysis*
Fatty Acids, Volatile / analysis
Female
Fermentation
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Lactation*
Mastication
Milk / chemistry*
Regression Analysis
Rumen / metabolism
Starch / analysis,  metabolism
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Fats; 0/Fatty Acids, Volatile; 9005-25-8/Starch

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Efficacy of a novel whey protein gel complex to increase the unsaturated fatty acid composition of b...
Next Document:  Hypocalcemia in dairy cows: meta-analysis and dietary cation anion difference theory revisited.