Document Detail


Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19625717     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: A pay-for-performance scheme based on meeting targets for the quality of clinical care was introduced to family practice in England in 2004. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis of the quality of care in 42 representative family practices, with data collected at two time points before implementation of the scheme (1998 and 2003) and at two time points after implementation (2005 and 2007). At each time point, data on the care of patients with asthma, diabetes, or coronary heart disease were extracted from medical records; data on patients' perceptions of access to care, continuity of care, and interpersonal aspects of care were collected from questionnaires. The analysis included aspects of care that were and those that were not associated with incentives. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2005, the rate of improvement in the quality of care increased for asthma and diabetes (P<0.001) but not for heart disease. By 2007, the rate of improvement had slowed for all three conditions (P<0.001), and the quality of those aspects of care that were not associated with an incentive had declined for patients with asthma or heart disease. As compared with the period before the pay-for-performance scheme was introduced, the improvement rate after 2005 was unchanged for asthma or diabetes and was reduced for heart disease (P=0.02). No significant changes were seen in patients' reports on access to care or on interpersonal aspects of care. The level of the continuity of care, which had been constant, showed a reduction immediately after the introduction of the pay-for-performance scheme (P<0.001) and then continued at that reduced level. CONCLUSIONS: Against a background of increases in the quality of care before the pay-for-performance scheme was introduced, the scheme accelerated improvements in quality for two of three chronic conditions in the short term. However, once targets were reached, the improvement in the quality of care for patients with these conditions slowed, and the quality of care declined for two conditions that had not been linked to incentives. Continuity of care was reduced after the introduction of the scheme.
Authors:
Stephen M Campbell; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Bonnie Sibbald; Martin Roland
Related Documents :
25467 - A brief review of sympathomimetic bronchodilators and a description of a new selective ...
18049097 - Evaluation of the effects of toluene inhalation on alveolar epithelial permeability by ...
12866317 - Inadequate diagnosis of nonallergic rhinitis: assessing the damage.
16779287 - Clinical impact of home automated telemanagement in asthma.
15097177 - Development of a consumer-driven wheelchair seating discomfort assessment tool (wcs-dat).
21263337 - Informal caregivers' experiences of caring for patients with chronic heart failure: sys...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The New England journal of medicine     Volume:  361     ISSN:  1533-4406     ISO Abbreviation:  N. Engl. J. Med.     Publication Date:  2009 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-07-23     Completed Date:  2009-07-29     Revised Date:  2009-10-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0255562     Medline TA:  N Engl J Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  368-78     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Affiliation:
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. stephen.campbell@manchester.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Asthma / therapy
Attitude to Health
Coronary Disease / therapy
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / therapy
England
Family Practice / economics,  standards*
Humans
Linear Models
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Physician Incentive Plans*
Primary Health Care / economics,  standards*
Quality of Health Care / economics,  trends*
Reimbursement, Incentive
State Medicine
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
//Department of Health
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 22;361(17):1709   [PMID:  19846861 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Thrombomodulin mutations in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome.
Next Document:  Does the morning and evening oscillator model fit better for flies or mice?