Document Detail

Effects of adding a second reinforcement alternative: implications for Herrnstein's interpretation of r(e).
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16262186     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Herrnstein's hyperbola describes the relation between response rate and reinforcer rate on variable-interval (VI) schedules. According to Herrnstein's (1970) interpretation, the parameter r(e) represents the reinforcer rate extraneous to the alternative to which the equation is fitted (the target alternative). The hyperbola is based on an assumption that extraneous reinforcer rate remains constant with changes in reinforcer rate on the target alternative (the constant-r(e) assumption) and that matching with no bias and perfect sensitivity occurs between response and reinforcer ratios. In the present experiment, 12 rats pressed levers for food on a series of 10 VI schedules arranged on the target alternative. Across conditions, six VI values and extinction were arranged on a second alternative. Reinforcer rate on the second alternative, r2, negatively covaried with reinforcer rate on the target alternative for five of the six VI values on the second alternative, and significant degrees of bias and undermatching occurred in response ratios. Given covariation of reinforcer rate on the second and target alternatives, the constant-r(e) assumption can be maintained only by assuming that reinforcer rate from unmeasured background sources, rb, covaries with reinforcer rate on the second alternative such that their sum, r(e), remains constant. In a single-schedule arrangement, however, r(e) equals rb and thus rb is assumed to remain constant, forcing a conceptual inconsistency between single- and concurrent-schedule arrangements. Furthermore, although an alternative formulation of the hyperbola can account for variations in bias and sensitivity, the modified equation also is based on the constant-r(e) assumption and therefore suffers from the same logical problem as the hyperbola when reinforcer rate on the second alternative covaries with reinforcer rate on the target alternative.
Paul L Soto; Jack J McDowell; Jesse Dallery
Related Documents :
16463536 - Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for food refusal and associated self-injury.
8046356 - On the relationship between differential outcomes and differential sample responding in...
19429216 - Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
9679306 - Temporal search as a function of the variability of interfood intervals.
17323866 - New onset egg allergy in an adult.
21471736 - Gender-specific prandial response to dietary restriction and oxidative stress in drosop...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior     Volume:  84     ISSN:  0022-5002     ISO Abbreviation:  J Exp Anal Behav     Publication Date:  2005 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-11-02     Completed Date:  2006-02-15     Revised Date:  2013-06-07    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0203727     Medline TA:  J Exp Anal Behav     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  185-225     Citation Subset:  IM    
Emory University, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Behavior, Animal
Models, Psychological*
Rats, Long-Evans
Reinforcement (Psychology)*
Reinforcement Schedule
Grant Support

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.
Next Document:  Crewmember performance before, during, and after spaceflight.