Document Detail


Effectiveness of positron emission tomography for the detection of melanoma metastases.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9605668     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical utility of 18F 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) total-body positron emission tomography (PET) scanning for the detection of metastases in patients with malignant melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent preliminary reports suggest that PET using FDG may be more sensitive and specific for detection of metastatic melanoma than standard radiologic imaging studies using computed tomography (CT). PET technology is showing utility in the detection of metastatic tumors from multiple primary sites including breast, lung, lymphoma, and melanoma. However, little information is available concerning the general utility, sensitivity, and specificity of PET scanning of patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: One hundred three PET scans done on 76 nonrandomized patients having AJCC stage II to IV melanoma were prospectively evaluated. Patients were derived from two groups. Group 1 (63 patients) had PET, CT (chest and abdomen), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; brain) scans as a part of staging requirements for immunotherapy protocols. Group 2 (13 nonprotocol patients) had PET, CT, and MRI scans as in group 1, but for clinical evaluation only. PET scans were done using 12 to 20 mCi of FDG given intravenously. Results of PET scans were compared to CT scans and biopsy or cytology results. RESULTS: PET scanning for the detection of melanoma metastases had a sensitivity of 94.2% and a specificity of 83.3% compared to 55.3% and 84.4%, respectively, for CT scanning. Factors that produced false-positive PET scans were papillary carcinoma of the thyroid (1), bronchogenic carcinoma (1), inflamed epidermal cyst (1), Warthin's tumor of the parotid gland (1), surgical wound inflammation (2), leiomyoma of the uterus (1), suture granuloma (1), and endometriosis (1). The four false-negative scans were thought to be due to smaller (<0.3 to 0.5 cm) and diffuse areas of melanoma without a mass effect. CONCLUSIONS: PET scanning is extremely sensitive (94.2%) and very specific (83.3%) for identifying metastatic melanoma, particularly in soft tissues, lymph nodes, and the liver. A number of second primary or metastatic tumors and an inflammatory response can also be localized by PET. This observation mandates a close clinical correlation with positive PET and emphasizes the importance of establishing a tissue diagnosis. False-negative scans in the presence of metastases are rare (4% of scans). Metastases < or =5 mm in diameter may not image well. PET is superior to CT in detecting melanoma metastases and has a role as a primary strategy in the staging of melanoma.
Authors:
W D Holder; R L White; J H Zuger; E J Easton; F L Greene
Related Documents :
20573058 - Occult nodal metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer at clinical stage i...
17019418 - Imaging features of ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative disease.
12501018 - Staging of recurrent and advanced lung cancer with 18f-fdg pet in a coincidence techniq...
18458598 - Determination of whole-body metabolic burden as a quantitative measure of disease activ...
9741548 - Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. multiple skull involvements.
20461768 - Optimal assessment of residual disease after neo-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of surgery     Volume:  227     ISSN:  0003-4932     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Surg.     Publication Date:  1998 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-06-11     Completed Date:  1998-06-11     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372354     Medline TA:  Ann Surg     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  764-9; discussion 769-71     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Diagnostic Errors
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 / diagnostic use*
Humans
Melanoma / radionuclide imaging*,  secondary*
Prospective Studies
Radiopharmaceuticals / diagnostic use*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin Neoplasms / pathology*
Tomography, Emission-Computed*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Radiopharmaceuticals; 63503-12-8/Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Clinical outcome in stage I to III breast carcinoma and eIF4E overexpression.
Next Document:  Effect of glutamine on methotrexate efficacy and toxicity.