Document Detail


Effectiveness of electro-acupuncture compared to sedo-analgesics in relieving pain during shockwave lithotripsy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15971087     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of electro-acupuncture (EA) with the combination of tramadol+midazolam (TM) for pain relief during outpatient extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 35 patients (20 men, 15 women) with stones located in the pelvicalyceal system of the kidney were randomized prospectively to undergo lithotripsy with a third generation lithotriptor (Stone Lith, smart PCK) after receiving either EA (n=17) or TM (n=18) for sedation and analgesia. EA treatment was applied to patients by the same licensed acupuncturist 30 min prior to ESWL in group EA. Tramadol (1.5 mg/kg) 30 min before the start of lithotripsy and midazolam (0.06 mg/kg) 5 min prior to ESWL were given as a sedo-analgesic intravenously to group TM. During ESWL, blood pressure, heart rate, pain and sedation levels were measured at baseline and every 15 min thereafter. The pain intensity perceived during lithotripsy was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). There was no statistical differences in the diameters of the stones and age of the patients between groups (P=0.590; P=0.568, respectively). In the EA group, the median of maximum energy level achieved was 16.0 kV (range 10-23 kV), while it was 18.0 kV (range 10-20 kV) in the TM group. There was no statistically significant difference between the maximum energy levels applied to the patients during ESWL (P=0.613). The median numbers of shockwaves were 2,114 (range 1,100-3,800) and 2,200 (range 1,500-3,200) in the EA and TM groups, respectively. In the TM group, the numbers of shockwaves used were higher than in group EA during ESWL. However, this difference was not significant (P=0.732). VAS scores were consistently lower in the EA group compared with the TM group throughout the ESWL procedure. The median VAS score was 5.0 (range 1-10) in the EA group while it was 8.0 (range 2-10) in the TM group. The patients who underwent EA had lower median scores of VAS than patients who took only conservative treatment, but this difference was not significant (P=0.245). When both groups were compared for stone-free rates, no significant difference was found [82.3% (14/17) for group EA, 88.8% (16/18) for group TM] (P=0.658). Durations of ESWL procedures were similar in both groups [median 27.4 min (range 15.7-34.3) in group EA vs 27.1 min (range 16.1-33.6) in group TM] (P=0.517). No side effects was seen in any patient who received EA. Side effects such as mild orthostatic hypotension and dizziness occurred in patients given sedo-analgesia, but these were not severe enough to require any patient to be excluded from the study. Our study shows that EA is an effective method for inducing sedation with analgesia without any demonstrable side effects.
Authors:
Sefa Resim; Yakup Gumusalan; Hasan Cetin Ekerbicer; Mehmet Akif Sahin; Tayfun Sahinkanat
Related Documents :
8632527 - Clinical implications of clinically insignificant store fragments after extracorporeal ...
1895677 - Pathogenesis of nephrolithiasis post-partial ileal bypass surgery: case-control study. ...
1942337 - Proposed new method for nonoperative treatment of urethral stones.
9187907 - Etiological and clinical patterns of urolithiasis in turkish children.
2087407 - Clinical effectiveness of 1 and 2% lidocaine in young pediatric dental patients.
24581257 - Tunnel volume enlargement after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2005-06-22
Journal Detail:
Title:  Urological research     Volume:  33     ISSN:  0300-5623     ISO Abbreviation:  Urol. Res.     Publication Date:  2005 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-08-31     Completed Date:  2006-01-04     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0364311     Medline TA:  Urol Res     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  285-90     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Urology, KSU Medical School, Kahramanmaras, Turkey. safaresim@ksu.edu.tr
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Electroacupuncture*
Female
Humans
Lithotripsy / adverse effects*
Male
Midazolam / administration & dosage*
Middle Aged
Pain / therapy*
Pain Measurement
Prospective Studies
Tramadol / administration & dosage*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
27203-92-5/Tramadol; 59467-70-8/Midazolam

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  How painful are shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures performed at outpatient urology clin...
Next Document:  Health economics studies in dermatology