|Effective treatment of squamous cell carcinomas with ingenol mebutate gel in immunologically intact SKH1 mice.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22871992 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher|
|Ingenol mebutate has recently been approved by the Federal Drug Administration (USA) as a topical treatment for actinic keratoses. Herein, we describe the efficacy of ingenol mebutate for the topical treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) using a wild-type mouse model (SKH1) and the UV-induced mouse SCC cell line, T7. Daily treatment for 2 days with 0.25 % ingenol mebutate gel produced a cure rate of 70 %, with 0 % for placebo gel. Electron microscopy revealed swelling of cancer cell mitochondria within 1 h, with disruption of the inner mitochondrial membranes evident at 6 h post treatment. Primary necrosis of cancer cells was clearly evident by 24 h. Treatment was associated with local haemorrhage and a prodigious neutrophil infiltrate, with anti-T7 antibodies also detected. This is the first report of the successful treatment of SCC tumours with ingenol mebutate gel in wild-type mice, and supports the view that ingenol mebutate induces primary necrosis and activates the immune system.|
|Sarah-Jane Cozzi; Thuy T Le; Steven M Ogbourne; Cini James; Andreas Suhrbier|
|Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2012-8-8|
|Title: Archives of dermatological research Volume: - ISSN: 1432-069X ISO Abbreviation: Arch. Dermatol. Res. Publication Date: 2012 Aug|
|Created Date: 2012-8-8 Completed Date: - Revised Date: -|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 8000462 Medline TA: Arch Dermatol Res Country: -|
|Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: -|
|Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Post Office Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Arch Dermatol Res
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Arch. Dermatol. Res
Publisher: Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg
© The Author(s) 2012
Received Day: 11 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Revision Received Day: 5 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 16 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 8 Month: 8 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 8 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 1 Year: 2013
Volume: 305 Issue: 1
First Page: 79 Last Page: 83
PubMed Id: 22871992
Publisher Id: 1270
|Effective treatment of squamous cell carcinomas with ingenol mebutate gel in immunologically intact SKH1 mice|
|Thuy T. LeAff1|
|Steven M. OgbourneAff2Aff4|
Address: +61-7-33620415 +61-7-33630106 andreasS@qimr.edu.au
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Post Office Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029 Australia
Peplin Ltd, Brisbane, QLD Australia
Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111 Australia
University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4558 Australia
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common human cancer after basal cell carcinoma, with >250,000 cases diagnosed in the USA each year. The usual treatment options include surgery, curettage and electrodesiccation, and radiation . Topical imiquimod or fluorouracil may also be suitable for patients with small tumours in low-risk locations, who are unwilling or unsuitable to receive conventional treatments .
Following phase III studies , topical ingenol mebutate (ingenol-3-angelate, PEP005) was recently approved by the Federal Drug Administration (USA) for the treatment of actinic keratosis, a precursor of SCC. Ingenol mebutate was derived from the sap of Euphorbia peplus, and in a phase I/II clinical study, a complete clinical response was achieved in 2/4 SCCs treated topically with the sap from this plant . Ingenol mebutate was also effective against inoculated murine SCC tumours (LK2 and PAM212) grown in nude mice (Foxn1nu or BALB/cnu/nu) [9, 12], with haemorrhage , neutrophils and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity appearing to be important for relapse-free cure in these models . In general, mouse studies have suggested that ingenol mebutate has a dual mechanism of action against tumours involving initial induction of primary necrosis  followed by immune-mediated clearance of residual tumour cells .
T cell deficient nude mice may not be ideal for testing treatments for SCCs, as SCCs are believed to be subject to immune control . This contention may extend to the testing of ingenol mebutate treatment in nude mice [9, 12], as there is emerging evidence suggesting cross talk between neutrophils and T cells [13, 18], with ingenol mebutate treatment also shown to induce anti-cancer T cells and antibodies [4, 7]. Here we test ingenol mebutate in an immunologically intact mouse model, inbred SKH1 mice  inoculated with the T7 SCC line, derived from an SCC induced in these mice by chronic minimally erythemal ultraviolet irradiation .
T7 was provided by Dr G. Halliday (University of Sydney, NSW, Australia) and tested negative for mouse hepatitis virus, minute virus of mice, mouse parvovirus and rotavirus. Cells were maintained as described . Exponentially growing cultures were trypsinised, washed once in growth medium, and resuspended in DMEM prior to inoculation. Electron microscopy of T7 tumours demonstrated the presence of desmosomes, confirming the epithelial origin of the T7 line (see Online Resource 1).
Inbred SKH1 hairless (hr/hr) mice (ARC, Perth, Australia) were bred at QIMR . Mice (>4 weeks old) were inoculated (5 × 104 T7 cells in 50 μl) by shallow s.c. injection on the back. Tumours were measured using digital callipers, and size were expressed as width × length. Tumours were treated topically (on days 4 and 5 post tumour inoculation) with 30 μl of 0.25 % (w/v) ingenol mebutate or placebo gel (supplied by LEO Pharma A/S) using a positive displacement pipette, with the gel then spread over the tumour site.
Treatment of T7 SCC tumours growing in female mice with 0.25 % ingenol mebutate (once daily for two days) resulted in a 70 % cure rate, defined as no visible tumour after 150 days post treatment initiation (Fig. 1, logrank test, placebo vs ingenol mebutate, p = 0.0002). When the ingenol mebutate dose was reduced to 0.1 % in female mice, tumour growth was delayed significantly by ≈10 days (placebo vs ingenol mebutate, p = 0.0006), but the treatment failed to cure any of the tumours (data not shown).
Treatment of T7 tumours in male mice with 0.25 % ingenol mebutate resulted in a cure rate of 30 % (placebo vs ingenol mebutate p = 0.008, n = 10 per group) (data not shown). The difference between male and female mice treated with 0.25 % ingenol mebutate approached significance (p = 0.108).
Within hours of ingenol mebutate treatment, clear signs of haemorrhage in and around the tumour site were evident. After 48 h an eschar formed over the tumour site, which resolved after 3–4 weeks, with a favourable cosmetic outcome evident after 2–3 months (Fig. 2a). Electron microscopy showed disruption of the inner membrane and cristae of the tumour mitochondria within hours of treatment, with complete loss of inner membrane structures evident at 16–24 h (Fig. 2b). At 24 h post treatment, primary necrosis of tumour cells was clearly seen (Fig. 2b).
Histology of placebo-treated tumours (which were indistinguishable from untreated tumours) illustrated their subcutaneous location ≈200–300 μm below the epidermis (Fig. 2c, left panel). Six hours after ingenol mebutate treatment, widespread haemorrhage was evident throughout the tumour (Fig. 2c, upper right panel) and the surrounding tissue (not shown). A neutrophil infiltrate was evident as early as 6 h post treatment (not shown), and by 24 h prodigious neutrophil infiltrates were seen in and around the tumour site (Fig. 2c, lower right panel).
Herein, we show that ingenol mebutate gel treatment (0.25 %) was effective at regressing subcutaneous SCCs using the T7/SKH1 mouse model. This study, together with previous clinical studies using E. peplus sap , supports further clinical development of ingenol mebutate for the treatment of SCCs in humans.
Ingenol mebutate gel treatment of SCCs in this model resulted in a rapid onset of haemorrhage in and around the tumour, disruption of tumour cell mitochondria and death of the tumour cells by primary necrosis. A prodigious infiltrate of neutrophils was observed, with post treatment SCC-specific IgG responses also apparent (see Online Resource 2), suggesting the activation of SCC-specific CD4 T cells. These observations are consistent with previous studies using murine SCC lines grown in nude mice and mouse B16 melanomas grown in C57/BL6 mice [4, 7, 9, 12], and support the view that ingenol mebutate gel treatment kills tumour cells by inducing primary necrosis with both the innate and adaptive immune systems being activated.
The ingenol mebutate concentration in the gel (0.25 %) required to cure T7 tumours was higher than the 0.05 % being used to treat actinic keratoses in humans ; however, 0.25 % ingenol mebutate gel has been tested for the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinomas in a small number of patients . LK2 tumours in nude mice were effectively treated with 0.1 % ingenol mebutate given daily for 3 days . The reason for the lower dose requirement in the LK2/nude model is unclear, with no overt differences in neutrophil infiltration apparent in the LK2/nude and SKH1/T7 models. The LD90 values for in vitro treatment of LK2 and T7 cells with ingenol mebutate were also both ≈100 μg/ml (data not shown). The differences may reflect increased drug penetration through nude mouse skin  or other differences in skin biology, rather than be related to immunological differences between the mouse strains. The possible difference (p = 0.108) in cure rates for male and female SKH1 mice may similarly reflect increased drug penetration through female mouse skin . Gender differences in the thickness of different skin layers have been reported for SKH1 and other mice [1, 15], and in our experience SKH1 male skin is tougher and harder to inject than female skin. Such skin differences in mice may influence drug penetration, but may also affect other factors such as the consistency of shallow s.c. injections of tumour cells and/or local dissemination of the tumours. It should also be noted that there were no gender differences in the efficacy of ingenol mebutate in the treatment of actinic keratoses in humans .
Although SCCs are believed to be subject to immune control , there is a paucity of SCC models in immunologically intact mice . We also investigated the 13.1 SCC line derived from C3H/HeN mice  and confirmed its epithelial origin using electron microscopy (data not shown). However, variable spontaneous regression rates (0–60 %) and variable growth rates (10–60 days to reach 100 mm2) made this model difficult to use. In contrast, the T7 SCC model provides a convenient and a reliable model for testing interventions in immunologically intact mice; however, the model does require an inbred SKH1 colony, as these mice are no longer commercially available.
This work was conducted with financial assistance from Peplin Biotech Pty. Ltd. and a National Health and Medical Research Industry Fellowship (S-J Cozzi). Peplin Inc is now wholly owned by LEO Pharma.
This work was conducted with financial assistance from Peplin Biotech Pty. Ltd. and a National Health and Medical Research Industry Fellowship (S-J Cozzi). Peplin Inc. is now wholly owned by LEO Pharma. S-J Cozzi is now an employee of LEO Pharma Inc., Australia. S Ogbourne is no longer an employee of Peplin Biotech Pty. Ltd. A. Suhrbier has been a paid consultant for Peplin Biotech Pty. Ltd. and LEO Pharma A/S.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
|1..||Azzi L,El-Alfy M,Martel C,et al. Gender differences in mouse skin morphology and specific effects of sex steroids and dehydroepiandrosteroneJ Invest DermatolYear: 2005124222710.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23545.x15654949|
|2..||Belkin D,Carucci JA. Mohs surgery for squamous cell carcinomaDermatol ClinYear: 20112916117410.1016/j.det.2011.02.00621421142|
|3..||Bronaugh RL,Stewart RF,Congdon ER. Differences in permeability of rat skin related to sex and body siteJ Soc Cosmet ChemYear: 198334127135|
|4..||Challacombe JM,Suhrbier A,Parsons PG,et al. Neutrophils are a key component of the antitumor efficacy of topical chemotherapy with ingenol-3-angelateJ ImmunolYear: 20061778123813217114487|
|5..||Cozzi SJ,Ogbourne SM,James C,et al. Ingenol mebutate field-directed treatment of UVB-damaged skin reduces lesion formation and removes mutant p53 patchesJ Invest DermatolYear: 20121321263127110.1038/jid.2011.41822189786|
|6..||Ku J (2011) Clinical Review NDA 202833 PICATO™. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/202833Orig1s000MedR.pdf.accessed May 2012|
|7..||Le TT,Gardner J,Hoang-Le D,et al. Immunostimulatory cancer chemotherapy using local ingenol-3-angelate and synergy with immunotherapiesVaccineYear: 2009273053306210.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.02519428919|
|8..||Lebwohl M,Swanson N,Anderson LL,et al. Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosisN Engl J MedYear: 20123661010101910.1056/NEJMoa111117022417254|
|9..||Li L,Shukla S,Lee A,et al. The skin cancer chemotherapeutic agent ingenol-3-angelate (PEP005) is a substrate for the epidermal multidrug transporter (ABCB1) and targets tumor vasculatureCancer ResYear: 2010704509451910.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-430320460505|
|10..||Love WE,Bernhard JD,Bordeaux JS. Topical imiquimod or fluorouracil therapy for basal and squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic reviewArch DermatolYear: 20091451431143810.1001/archdermatol.2009.29120026854|
|11..||Lucas AD,Halliday GM. Progressor but not regressor skin tumours inhibit Langerhans’ cell migration from epidermis to local lymph nodesImmunologyYear: 19999713013710.1046/j.1365-2567.1999.00751.x10447724|
|12..||Ogbourne SM,Suhrbier A,Jones B,et al. Antitumor activity of 3-ingenyl angelate: plasma membrane and mitochondrial disruption and necrotic cell deathCancer ResYear: 2004642833283910.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-283715087400|
|13..||Pelletier M,Maggi L,Micheletti A,et al. Evidence for a cross-talk between human neutrophils and Th17 cellsBloodYear: 201011533534310.1182/blood-2009-04-21608519890092|
|14..||Ramsay JR,Suhrbier A,Aylward JH,et al. The sap from Euphorbia peplus is effective against human nonmelanoma skin cancersBr J DermatolYear: 201116463363621375515|
|15..||Reeve VE,Allanson M,Domanski D,et al. Gender differences in UV-induced inflammation and immunosuppression in mice reveal male unresponsiveness to UVA radiationPhotochem Photobiol SciYear: 20121117317910.1039/c1pp05224a21968628|
|16..||Reifenrath WG,Chellquist EM,Shipwash EA,et al. Percutaneous penetration in the hairless dog, weanling pig and grafted athymic nude mouse: evaluation of models for predicting skin penetration in manBr J DermatolYear: 1984111Suppl 2712313510.1111/j.1365-2133.1984.tb15590.x6204672|
|17..||Rosen RH,Gupta AK,Tyring SK. Dual mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate gel for topical treatment of actinic keratoses: rapid lesion necrosis followed by lesion-specific immune responseJ Am Acad DermatolYear: 20126648649310.1016/j.jaad.2010.12.03822055282|
|18..||Smith E,Vietinghoff S,Stark MA,et al. T-lineage cells require the thymus but not VDJ recombination to produce IL-17A and regulate granulopoiesis in vivoJ ImmunolYear: 20091835685569310.4049/jimmunol.090088719843951|
|19..||Vahle AK,Kerem A,Ozturk E,et al. Optimization of an orthotopic murine model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in fully immunocompetent mice-role of Toll-like-receptor 4 expressed on host cellsCancer LettYear: 201231719920610.1016/j.canlet.2011.11.02722123294|
|20..||Walter A,Barysch MJ,Behnke S,et al. Cancer-testis antigens and immunosurveillance in human cutaneous squamous cell and basal cell carcinomasClin Cancer ResYear: 2010163562357010.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-313620519358|
Keywords: Keywords Ingenol mebutate, Squamous cell carcinoma, Mouse model.
Previous Document: Approximating the dynamics of communicating cells in a diffusive medium by ODEs-homogenization with ...
Next Document: Subtoxic levels hydrogen peroxide-induced expression of interleukin-6 by epidermal melanocytes.