Document Detail

Effective dose: practice, purpose and pitfalls for nuclear medicine.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21617297     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Effective dose (E) is the only comparatively simple dose quantity that is related to health detriment for stochastic effects from exposure to ionising radiation. As such, E has found wide application for medical exposures, as it allows comparisons with doses from different examinations and other sources. E is derived from the weighted sum of doses to tissues known to be sensitive to radiation from epidemiological studies and contains inherent approximations. Thus it is not a scientific quantity, but a practical one that the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has created for use in the calculation of reference doses for protection purposes. In the application of E to medical exposures, there has been a tendency to attribute a greater accuracy to values of E than is justified by its derivation. Recognising that E is strictly not subject to uncertainties, an analysis has been undertaken of potential uncertainties in E for different nuclear medicine examinations to enable users to judge its reliability as a comparator of relative risk. Assessments have been based on the considered accuracy of the component parts and indicate that the uncertainties in the values of E as a relative indicator of harm for nuclear medicine procedures for a reference patient are about ± 50%. These are larger than those for radiology procedures, because of the tendency for doses to single organs, especially the bladder, to form a substantial part of E for some procedures. Revision of the tissue weighting factors in 2007 produced a 10% decrease in the mean value of E for nuclear medicine examinations. Estimations of cancer risk based on E for an individual could vary by one or two orders of magnitude. E fulfils an important role as a health-related dose quantity that can be used in justification of nuclear medicine examinations, but physicians should be aware of its limitations. General terminology should be used in conveying risks to patients and medical professionals.
C J Martin
Related Documents :
20101067 - Symposium on roles of and cooperation between academic- and practice-based pharmacy cli...
11495317 - The assessment of sport-related concussion: the evidence behind neuropsychological test...
18074207 - Lost in translation: bibliotherapy and evidence-based medicine.
14686097 - Evidence-based medicine: why clinical ethicists should be concerned.
24792227 - Integral control for population management.
19382417 - Recommendations on strengthening the development of nuclear medicine in china.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-5-26
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection     Volume:  31     ISSN:  1361-6498     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-5-27     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8809257     Medline TA:  J Radiol Prot     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  205-219     Citation Subset:  -    
Health Physics, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow G12 0XH, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Severe deterministic effects of external exposure and intake of radioactive material: basis for emer...
Next Document:  The history of IRPA-up to the millennium.