|Effect of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis on outcome in patients without chronic respiratory failure: a case-control study.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 15987396 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to determine the effect of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) on outcome in patients without chronic respiratory failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational matched study, conducted in a 30-bed intensive care unit (ICU). All immunocompetent, nontrauma, ventilated patients without chronic respiratory failure admitted over a 6.5-year period were included. Data were collected prospectively. Patients with nosocomial pneumonia, either before or after VAT, were excluded. Only first episodes of VAT occurring more than 48 hours after initiation of mechanical ventilation were studied. Six criteria were used to match cases with controls, including duration of mechanical ventilation before VAT. Cases were compared with controls using McNemar's test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Variables associated with a duration of mechanical ventilation longer than median were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Using the six criteria, it was possible to match 55 (87%) of the VAT patients (cases) with non-VAT patients (controls). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated bacteria (34%). Although mortality rates were similar between cases and controls (29% versus 36%; P = 0.29), the median duration of mechanical ventilation (17 days [range 3-95 days] versus 8 [3-61 days]; P < 0.001) and ICU stay (24 days [range 5-95 days] versus 12 [4-74] days; P < 0.001) were longer in cases than in controls. Renal failure (odds ratio [OR] = 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-14.6; P = 0.004), tracheostomy (OR = 4, 95% CI = 1.1-14.5; P = 0.032), and VAT (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.5-8.3; P = 0.004) were independently associated with duration of mechanical ventilation longer than median. CONCLUSION: VAT is associated with longer durations of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in patients not suffering from chronic respiratory failure.|
|Saad Nseir; Christophe Di Pompeo; Stéphane Soubrier; Hélène Lenci; Pierre Delour; Thierry Onimus; Fabienne Saulnier; Daniel Mathieu; Alain Durocher|
Related Documents :
|16603026 - Use of the prone position in the acute respiratory distress syndrome: how should we ass...
7898136 - Severe hypercapnia after low-flow oxygen therapy in patients with neuromuscular disease...
1098616 - Treatment of flail chest. use of intermittent mandatory ventilation and positive end-ex...
9351606 - Impairment of lung and chest wall mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress...
8235836 - Scoliosis associated with syringomyelia.
16818296 - Differences in reasons for smoking between younger and older smokers.
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2005-03-31|
|Title: Critical care (London, England) Volume: 9 ISSN: 1466-609X ISO Abbreviation: Crit Care Publication Date: 2005 Jun|
|Created Date: 2005-06-30 Completed Date: 2006-08-03 Revised Date: 2009-11-18|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 9801902 Medline TA: Crit Care Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: R238-45 Citation Subset: IM|
|Regional University Centre, Calmette Hospital, EA 3614, Lille II University, Lille, France. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Bronchitis / drug therapy, etiology*, microbiology
Cross Infection / drug therapy, etiology*, microbiology
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Respiration, Artificial / adverse effects*
|Crit Care. 2005 Jun;9(3):255-6
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Crit Care
Publisher: BioMed Central, London
Copyright ? 2005 Nseir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
open-access: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received Day: 26 Month: 10 Year: 2004
Revision Requested Day: 9 Month: 2 Year: 2005
Revision Received Day: 16 Month: 2 Year: 2005
Accepted Day: 24 Month: 2 Year: 2005
Print publication date: Year: 2005
Electronic publication date: Day: 31 Month: 3 Year: 2005
Volume: 9 Issue: 3
First Page: R238 Last Page: R245
Publisher Id: cc3508
PubMed Id: 15987396
|Effect of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis on outcome in patients without chronic respiratory failure: a case?control study|
|Saad Nseir1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Christophe Di Pompeo2|
1Intensive Care Unit, Calmette Hospital, Regional University Centre, and Medical Assessment Laboratory, EA 3614, Lille II University, Lille, France
2Medical Assessment Laboratory, EA 3614, Lille II University, Lille, France
3Intensive Care Unit, Calmette Hospital, Regional University Centre, Lille, France
Nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections are the most common nosocomial infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) . Although several studies have investigated nosocomial pneumonia, few evaluated ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT).
VAT is a common nosocomial infection among mechanically ventilated patients. VAT rates of 3.7?10.6% have been reported in the literature [2-4]. In a previous descriptive prospective cohort study conducted in 2128 patients , our group demonstrated that VAT was associated with increased durations of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. However, two major limitations of the study prevented us from drawing definite conclusions: absence of adjustment for duration of mechanical ventilation before the occurrence of VAT; and inclusion of patients with and patients without chronic respiratory failure. Therefore, we performed a retrospective case?control study to assess the effect of VAT on outcomes in patients without chronic respiratory failure.
This retrospective case?control study was conducted in our 30-bed ICU from March 1993 to September 1999. Because it was observational, institutional review board approval was not required, which is in accordance with institutional review board regulations.
All immunocompetent, nontrauma patients without chronic respiratory failure who were intubated and ventilated for more than 48 hours were eligible. Patients with chronic respiratory failure, trauma patients, patients who were not ventilated or ventilated for less than 48 hours, patients who received only noninvasive pressure ventilation, patients with tracheostomy at ICU admission and immunocompromised patients were not eligible. Patients who developed nosocomial pneumonia, before or after the occurrence of VAT, were excluded. The patients included in the present study were also included in our previous prospective observational study of VAT , representing 5% of the 2128 patients included in the previous study.
Patients were intubated via either the oral or the nasal route, according to clinical status and preference of the physician in charge. The oropharyngeal cavity was cleaned four times daily with chlorhexidine solution. Continuous subglottic suctioning was not utilized. The ventilator circuit was not changed routinely. In all patients a heat?moisture exchanger was positioned between the Y-piece and the patient; the heat?moisture exchangers were changed every 48 hours, or more frequently if they were visibly soiled. No patient received inhaled antibiotics. Patients were kept in a semirecumbent position during most of their period of mechanical ventilation. Sedation and weaning procedures were done at the discretion of the physician in charge. No systematic stress ulcer prophylaxis and no selective digestive decontamination was given. Tracheal aspiration was performed by nurses every 3 hours and whenever necessary.
Throughout the study, endotracheal aspirates for quantitative bacterial cultures were obtained routinely on admission, weekly thereafter, and whenever VAT or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was suspected. Antimicrobial therapy for VAT was at discretion of the physician in charge.
All data were collected prospectively. VAT episodes were identified by prospective surveillance of nosocomial infections. Only first episodes of VAT occurring more than 48 hours after initiation of mechanical ventilation were included. 'Cases' are VAT patients, and 'controls' are patients without VAT. Tracheobronchitis was defined using all of the following criteria: fever (>38?C) with no other recognizable cause; new or increased sputum production; positive (? 106 colony-forming units/ml) endotracheal aspirate culture , yielding a new bacteria; and no radiographic evidence of nosocomial pneumonia. In patients with abnormal chest radiograph at admission, the absence of new or progressive radiographic infiltrates was required. To define nosocomial pneumonia, a second set of criteria developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was used . Other nosocomial infections were defined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria .
Antimicrobial therapy was deemed adequate when at least one antibiotic active in vitro on all organisms causing VAT was administrated at an appropriate dosage within the first 48 hours after VAT was identified. Chronic respiratory failure was defined by the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  or chronic restrictive pulmonary disease diagnosed on the basis of history, physical examination, chest radiography and respiratory function tests. Immunosupression was defined as the presence of neutropenia (leucocyte count <1000/?L or neutrophils <500/?L), long-term corticosteroid therapy (? 0.5 mg/kg per day for more than 1 month), or HIV infection (CD4+ cell count <50/?L for the previous 6 months). Multidrug-resistant bacteria were defined as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, ceftazidime or imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, extended-spectrum ?-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Prior antibiotic treatment was defined as any antibiotic treatment over the 2 weeks preceding ICU admission. Outcomes evaluated included ICU mortality, and durations of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.
Each case patient was matched to one control patients according to all the following criteria: duration of mechanical ventilation before VAT occurrence (a control patient had to have been mechanically ventilated for at least as long as a case patient had before they developed VAT); primary diagnosis for admission; category of admission (medical/surgical); Simplified Acute Physiology Score II on admission (? 5 points) ; age (? 5 years); and date of admission (when more than one potential control was well matched to a case).
SPSS software (SPSS Institute Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data. Cases were compared with controls using McNemar's test for qualitative variables, and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test for quantitative variables.
Because the distribution of duration of mechanical ventilation was skewed, we first determined the median duration of mechanical ventilation in cases and controls, and then we performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify those variables associated with duration of mechanical ventilation longer than median. The following variables were included in univariate analysis: age, sex, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II on admission, transfer from other wards, diabetes mellitus, primary diagnosis for admission, organ failures , antibiotic use, tracheostomy, VAT related to multidrug-resistant bacteria, and VAT. A stepwise logistic regression, including significant (P < 0.05) variables, was used to determine which variables were independently associated with duration of mechanical ventilation longer than median.
In order to determine the impact of antibiotic administration on VAT patient outcome, case patients receiving adequate antibiotic treatment were compared with those who received inadequate antibiotic treatment.
Proportions were compared using the ?2 test or the Fisher's exact test where appropriate; continuous variables were compared using the Mann?Whitney U-test.
A total of 928 patients were eligible, 136 (14%) of whom were excluded because they developed nosocomial pneumonia before VAT. Seventy (8%) first episodes of VAT were diagnosed in the 792 remaining patients. Seven of the 70 patients (10%) were excluded because they subsequently developed nosocomial pneumonia. Using the six criteria outlined above (see Methods), it was possible to match 55 (87%) of the VAT patients without prior or subsequent nosocomial pneumonia (cases) with non-VAT patients (controls; Fig. 1).
Before ICU admission and during the ICU stay, cases received antibiotics more frequently than did controls. During the ICU stay tracheostomy was performed more frequently in cases than in controls. Other patient characteristics were similar between case and control patients (Table 1). The mean period between ICU admission and development of VAT was 11 ? 8 days (median 8 [range 3?47] days). The mean period between starting mechanical ventilation and development of VAT was 10 ? 9 days (median 7 [range 3?47] days).
A total of 86 micro-organisms were isolated in the 55 VAT episodes. The more frequently isolated bacteria were P aeruginosa (34%), A baumannii (18%) and methicillin-resistant S aureus (11%). Thirty (54%) VAT episodes were polymicrobial, and 31 (56%) were related to multidrug-resistant bacteria (Table 2).
Although the durations of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were significantly longer in cases than in controls, no significant difference was found in mortality rate between case and control patients (Table 3). No significant difference in outcome was found between VAT patients who received adequate antibiotic treatment and those who received inadequate antibiotic treatment (Table 4). In cases with multidrug-resistant bacteria compared with cases with other bacteria, we observed similar durations of mechanical ventilation (23 ? 17 days versus 18 ? 13 days; P = 0.869), similar lengths of ICU stay (29 ? 14 versus 29 ? 18 days; P = 0.166) and similar ICU mortality rates (10/31 [32%] versus 6/24 [25%]; P = 0.359).
The results of univariate and multivariate analyses are presented in Table 5.
The results of this study demonstrate that VAT is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in immunocompetent nontrauma patients without chronic respiratory failure.
Tracheobronchitis is characterized by lower respiratory tract inflammation and increased sputum production. These factors may generate weaning difficulties, resulting in longer duration of mechanical ventilation. Extubation failure and difficult weaning have been reported to be associated with increased sputum volume in mechanically ventilated patients .
Previous studies [4,11] highlighted the link between tracheobronchitis and prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, but these studies did not adjust for confounding factors; in particular, they did not adjust for duration of mechanical ventilation before development of VAT. Thus, based on those studies VAT could be considered a cause or a consequence of prolonged mechanical ventilation. The present case?control study, in which we adjusted for several confounding factors, is to our knowledge the first to demonstrate that VAT is independently associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation in patients without chronic respiratory failure. However, an interventional randomized study is needed to confirm our findings.
In this study, duration of ICU stay was significantly longer in cases than in controls. However, mortality rates were similar between the two groups. In contrast, a recent prospective observational study , conducted in patients who had undergone heart surgery, found significantly higher mortality rates in patients with VAT than in noncolonized patients (20.7% versus 1.6%), and no significant difference in ICU and hospital lengths of stay between the two groups (12 days versus 5 days, and 20 days versus 13 days, respectively). However, the number of patients with VAT included in that study was small (n = 29). In addition, VAT patients who developed subsequent VAP were not excluded. Moreover, no adjustment was made for confounding factors.
VAT is probably an intermediate process between lower respiratory tract colonization and VAP. The diagnosis of VAT may be difficult in patients with chest radiographic abnormalities at ICU admission. However, recent guidelines recommend using new chest radiograph infiltrates as a criterion for diagnosis of VAP . On the other hand, VAT is also difficult to differentiate from colonization. However, only new bacteria were taken into account in the present study. Moreover, we used quantitative tracheal aspirates to diagnose VAT, with a high threshold at 106 colony-forming units/ml.
The high proportion of multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients with VAT may be accounted for by the following factors: 87% of these patients were transferred from other wards; 72% of patients with VAT received antibiotics before ICU admission; and there was a long mean period between ICU admission and VAT development. These factors are well known to be associated with the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in ICU patients .
Whether antibiotics should be administered to patients with VAT is actually a subject of debate. Clinical practice with respect to antibiotic treatment in patients with VAT varies widely between ICU physicians. Whereas some physicians do not treat this infection, considering it to be simple colonization, others routinely treat patients with VAT or only those patients with weaning difficulties and/or underlying disease [11,14,15]. In the present study only 21% of patients with VAT received antibiotics to treat this infection. No significant difference in outcome was found between patients who received adequate antimicrobial treatment and those with inadequate antimicrobial treatment. However, our findings are limited by the small number of VAT patients who received adequate antibiotic treatment. Antibiotic treatment could eradicate respiratory bacterial load and decrease sputum production. In a prospective study conducted in long-term mechanically ventilated patients with chronic bacterial colonization, Palmer and coworkers  observed a significant decrease in tracheal secretion volume, inflammatory cells and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 burden in those patients who received antibiotics. Nevertheless, excessive antibiotic usage is associated with subsequent emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and causes measurable harm in ICU patients [16,17]. Therefore, further randomized studies are warranted to determine whether patients with VAT should be treated with antibiotics .
Recent guidelines on appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults  indicate that antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis should not be routinely applied. This recommendation is based on several randomized controlled studies [20-25] and recent meta-analyses [26-30]; all studies reported no impact of antibiotic treatment on illness duration, activity limitation, or work loss, and all concluded that routine antibiotic treatment of adults with acute bronchitis is not justified. However, all of those studies were conducted in healthy adults. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled study has been reported in mechanically ventilated patients with nosocomial tracheobronchitis.
Our study has several limitations. First, the study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Second, our study was performed in a single ICU, and the results may not be applicable to patients in other ICUs. Third, some of the trends observed in the study might have reached statistical significance if the study sample had been larger. Forth, over the long period of study, some changes in case-mix, medical and nursing practices, workload and workforce might have occurred. However, VAT was independently associated with longer than median duration of mechanical ventilation in case and control patients during the study period. Finally, that patients with VAT who subsequently developed VAP were excluded probably overlooked an important consequence of VAT. However, VAP is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and so exclusion of these patients allowed us to assess the true impact of VAT on outcome .
VAT is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in immunocompetent nontrauma patients without chronic respiratory failure. Further studies are required to confirm our results and to evaluate the impact of antibiotic treatment on outcomes of patients with VAT.
? VAT is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in immunocompetent nontrauma patients without chronic respiratory failure.
? There was no significant difference in outcome between VAT patients who received adequate antibiotic treatment and those who received inadequate antibiotic treatment.
? Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of antibiotic treatment on outcomes in patients with VAT.
ICU = intensive care unit; VAP = ventilator-associated pneumonia; VAT = ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
The results of this study were presented in part at the 100th ATS International Conference (2004; Orlando, FL, USA).
|Vincent JL,Bihari DJ,Suter PM,Bruining HA,White J,Nicolas-Chanoin MH,Wolff M,Spencer RC,Hemmer M. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory CommitteeJAMA 1995;274:639–644. [pmid: 7637145] [doi: 10.1001/jama.274.8.639]|
|Rello J,Ausina V,Castella J,Net A,Prats G. Nosocomial respiratory tract infections in multiple trauma patients. Influence of level of consciousness with implications for therapyChest 1992;102:525–529. [pmid: 1643942]|
|Bouza E,Perez A,Munoz P,Jesus Perez M,Rincon C,Sanchez C,Martin-Rabadan P,Riesgo M. Ventilator-associated pneumonia after heart surgery: a prospective analysis and the value of surveillanceCrit Care Med 2003;31:1964–1970. [pmid: 12847390] [doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000084807.15352.93]|
|Nseir S,Di Pompeo C,Pronnier P,Beague S,Onimus T,Saulnier F,Grandbastien B,Mathieu D,Delvallez-Roussel M,Durocher A. Nosocomial tracheobronchitis in mechanically ventilated patients: incidence, aetiology and outcomeEur Respir J 2002;20:1483–1489. [pmid: 12503708] [doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00012902]|
|Marquette CH,Georges H,Wallet F,Ramon P,Saulnier F,Neviere R,Mathieu D,Rime A,Tonnel AB. Diagnostic efficiency of endotracheal aspirates with quantitative bacterial cultures in intubated patients with suspected pneumonia. Comparison with the protected specimen brushAm Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:138–144. [pmid: 8317789]|
|Garner JS,Jarvis WR,Emori TG,Horan TC,Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140. [pmid: 2841893]|
|AnonymousStandards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, November 1986Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:225–244. [pmid: 3605835]|
|Le Gall JR,Lemeshow S,Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter studyJAMA 1993;270:2957–2963. [pmid: 8254858] [doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957]|
|Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP,Zimmerman JE. Prognosis in acute organ-system failureAnn Surg 1985;202:685–693. [pmid: 4073980]|
|Epstein SK. Decision to extubateIntensive Care Med 2002;28:535–546. [pmid: 12029399] [doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1268-8]|
|Palmer LB,Smaldone GC,Simon S,O'Riordan T,Morra L. Tracheal aspirates in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. A human model of gram-negative infection and airway inflammationChest 1995;108:1326–1332. [pmid: 7587436]|
|Cohen J,Brun-Buisson C,Torres A,Jorgensen J. Diagnosis of infection in sepsis: an evidence-based reviewCrit Care Med 2004;32:S466–S494. [pmid: 15542957] [doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000145917.89975.F5]|
|Safdar N,Maki DG. The commonality of risk factors for nosocomial colonization and infection with antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus, gram-negative bacilli, Clostridium difficile, and CandidaAnn Intern Med 2002;136:834–844. [pmid: 12044132]|
|Ahmed QA,Niederman MS. Respiratory infection in the chronically critically ill patient. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitisClin Chest Med 2001;22:71–85. [pmid: 11315460]|
|Hamer DH. Treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and tracheobronchitis caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with aerosolized colistinAm J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:328–330. [pmid: 10903263]|
|Kollef MH,Fraser VJ. Antibiotic resistance in the intensive care unitAnn Intern Med 2001;134:298–314. [pmid: 11182841]|
|Nseir S,Di Pompeo C,Soubrier S,Delour P,Lenci H,Roussel-Delvallez M,Onimus T,Saulnier F,Mathieu D,Durocher A. First-generation fluoroquinolone use and subsequent emergence of multiple drug-resistant bacteria in the intensive care unitCrit Care Med 2005;33:283–289. [pmid: 15699829] [doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000152230.53473.A1]|
|AnonymousGuidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumoniaAm J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:388–416. [pmid: 15699079] [doi: 10.1164/rccm.200405-644ST]|
|Snow V,Mottur-Pilson C,Gonzales R. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of acute bronchitis in adultsAnn Intern Med 2001;134:518–520. [pmid: 11255531]|
|King DE,Williams WC,Bishop L,Shechter A. Effectiveness of erythromycin in the treatment of acute bronchitisJ Fam Pract 1996;42:601–605. [pmid: 8656171]|
|Verheij TJ,Hermans J,Mulder JD. Effects of doxycycline in patients with acute cough and purulent sputum: a double blind placebo controlled trialBr J Gen Pract 1994;44:400–404. [pmid: 8790652]|
|Williamson HA Jr. A randomized, controlled trial of doxycycline in the treatment of acute bronchitisJ Fam Pract 1984;19:481–486. [pmid: 6384419]|
|Brickfield FX,Carter WH,Johnson RE. Erythromycin in the treatment of acute bronchitis in a community practiceJ Fam Pract 1986;23:119–122. [pmid: 3525736]|
|Franks P,Gleiner JA. The treatment of acute bronchitis with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazoleJ Fam Pract 1984;19:185–190. [pmid: 6611385]|
|Dunlay J,Reinhardt R,Roi LD. A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of erythromycin in adults with acute bronchitisJ Fam Pract 1987;25:137–141. [pmid: 3302093]|
|Orr PH,Scherer K,Macdonald A,Moffatt ME. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of antibiotics for acute bronchitis: a critical review of the literatureJ Fam Pract 1993;36:507–512. [pmid: 8482934]|
|MacKay DN. Treatment of acute bronchitis in adults without underlying lung diseaseJ Gen Intern Med 1996;11:557–562. [pmid: 8905509]|
|Fahey T,Stocks N,Thomas T. Quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing antibiotic with placebo for acute cough in adultsBMJ 1998;316:906–910. [pmid: 9552842]|
|Smucny JJ,Becker LA,Glazier RH,McIsaac W. Are antibiotics effective treatment for acute bronchitis? A meta-analysisJ Fam Pract 1998;47:453–460. [pmid: 9866671]|
|Bent S,Saint S,Vittinghoff E,Grady D. Antibiotics in acute bronchitis: a meta-analysisAm J Med 1999;107:62–67. [pmid: 10403354] [doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00167-9]|
|Ioanas M,Ewig S,Torres A.. Treatment failures in patients with ventilator-associated pneumoniaInfect Dis Clin North Am 2003;17:753–771. [pmid: 15008597] [doi: 10.1016/S0891-5520(03)00070-9]|
[Figure ID: F1]
Study profile. VAT, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.
|Parameter/characteristic||Cases (n = 55)||Controls (n = 55)|
|?Age (years; mean ? SD]||59.9 ? 18.2||60.3 ? 17.5|
|?Male (n [%])||31 (56)||33 (60)|
|?SAPS II (mean ? SD)||37.2 ? 15.3||37.4 ? 14.7|
|?Transfer from other wards (n [%])||48 (87)||49 (89)|
|?Diabetes mellitus (n [%])||12 (21)||13 (23)|
|?Prior antibiotic treatment* (n [%])||40 (72)||15 (27)|
|Admission category (n [%])|
|?Medical||39 (70)||39 (70)|
|?Surgical||16 (29)||16 (29)|
|Primary diagnosis for admission (n [%])|
|?Community-acquired pneumonia||12 (21)||12 (21)|
|?Cellulitis||12 (21)||12 (21)|
|?Septic shock||10 (18)||10 (18)|
|?Congestive heart failure||7 (12)||7 (12)|
|?Peritonitis||4 (7)||4 (7)|
|?Acute respiratory distress syndrome||4 (7)||4 (7)|
|?Other||6 (10)||6 (10)|
|Organ failure (n [%])|
|?Cardiac||11 (20)||17 (30)|
|?Respiratory||38 (69)||41 (74)|
|?Renal||14 (25)||10 (18)|
|?Neurologic||12 (21)||19 (34)|
|?Digestive||3 (5)||5 (9)|
|?Tracheostomy? (n [%])||12 (21)||5 (9)|
|??n (%)||55 (100)||43 (78)|
|??Duration (days; mean ? SD)||13.3 ? 11.5||5.8 ? 9.2|
|??Antibiotic days/1000 ICU-days||485||330|
*P = 0.006, ?P = 0.056 and ?P < 0.001 (cases/controls) by univariate analysis. ICU, intensive care unit; SAPS, simplified acute physiology score; SD, standard deviation.
Bacteria associated with 55 episodes of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis
|??Pseudomonas aeruginosa||30 (34)|
|??Acinetobacter baumannii||16 (18)|
|??Serratia spp.||6 (6)|
|??Enterobacter spp.||4 (4)|
|??Escherichia coli||4 (4)|
|??Stenotrophomonas maltophilia||3 (3)|
|??Klebsiella spp.||3 (3)|
|??Streptococcus pneumoniae||5 (5)|
MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.
Outcomes of patients with (cases) and patients without (controls) ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis
|Outcome||Cases (n = 55)||Controls (n = 55)||Pa|
|Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)|
|??Median (range)||17.0 (3?95)||8.0 (3?61)||<0.001|
|??Mean ? SD||21.6 ? 16.0||13.3 ? 13.1|
|Length of ICU stay (days)|
|??Median (range)||24.5 (5?95)||12.0 (4?74)||<0.001|
|??Mean ? SD||28.0 ? 15.7||17.6 ? 16.6|
|ICU mortality (n [%])||16 (29)||20 (36)||0.294|
aResults by univariate analysis. ICU, intensive care unit; SD, standard deviation.
Impact of antibiotic treatment on outcomes of patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis
|Adequate (n = 12)||Inadequate (n = 43)|
|Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)|
|??Median (range)||17.0 (3?95)||18.5 (3?58)||0.833|
|??Mean ? SD||18.8 ? 9.7||22.3 ? 17.2|
|Length of ICU stay (days)|
|??Median (range)||22.0 (5?95)||25.0 (6?62)||0.344|
|??Mean ? SD||24.8 ? 14.5||30.5 ? 16.8|
|ICU mortality (n [%])||5 (41)||11 (25)||0.178|
Inadequate antibiotic treatment was given for infectious diseases other than ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. aResults by univariate analysis. ICU, intensive care unit; SD, standard deviation.
Factors associated with duration of mechanical ventilation longer than median (14 days) in patients with (cases) and without (controls) ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis
|Factor||Univariate analysis||Multivariate analysis|
|Number of patients (n = 110)||Number of patients with MV duration ? 14 days (%)||P||OR (95% CI)||P|
|Renal failure on ICU admission|
|??Yes||24||18 (75)||0.002||4.9 (1.6?14.6)||0.004|
|??Yes||17||13 (76)||0.009||4.0 (1.1?14.5)||0.032|
|VAT related to multidrug-resistant bacteria|
|??Yes||55||35 (63)||0.001||3.5 (1.5?8.3)||0.004|
CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit; MV, mechanical ventilation; OR, odds ratio; VAT, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.
Previous Document: Does fluid loading influence measurements of intestinal permeability?
Next Document: Use of intranasal mupirocin to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in inte...