Document Detail

Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20363418     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: According to national recommendations, colonoscopy withdrawal time (WT) on negative screening examinations should average more than 6 minutes because this time is associated with a higher rate of polyp detection. Attempts have been made to increase the WT; however, simply knowing that a quality measure, such as the WT, is being monitored, by itself, may improve the quality of an examination.
OBJECTIVE: To measure changes in the polyp detection rate associated with recording the WT.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Single tertiary care center.
PATIENTS: Patients undergoing colonoscopy within 5 months immediately before (group A) and after (group B) initiation of WT recording. Colonoscopies were excluded if procedure times were incomplete, missing, or nonsensical.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Polyp detection, compared by using the chi(2) test and logistic regression multivariate analyses; pathology manually reviewed from a sample of 200 consecutive polyp cases (100 per group).
RESULTS: The average WT in group B was 14.5 minutes (11.0 minutes in negative screening examinations). In group A, polyps were detected in 530 (37.7%) of 1405 colonoscopies compared with 571 (41.2%) of 1387 colonoscopies in group B (difference 3.5%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.1%), a nonsignificant 9.3% relative increase. Longer procedure time, age, sex, and indication were significant predictors; monitoring the WT was not. Nonsignificantly, more polyp examinations in group B found all nonadenomas compared with group A (36% vs 27%; P = .17), and polyps were nonsignificantly smaller (P = .30).
LIMITATIONS: Retrospective database data, pathology performed only on a subsample.
CONCLUSION: WT recording was associated with a nonsignificant increase in polyp detection, but this was likely attributable to a slight increase in the detection of (smaller) nonadenomatous polyps.
Andrew Taber; Joseph Romagnuolo
Related Documents :
3104348 - Reversal of defective lymphoproliferation in postoperative patients with colon cancer.
14675718 - Postoperative colonic motility in patients following laparoscopic-assisted and open sig...
22060888 - The chilled storage life and retail display performance of vacuum and carbon dioxide pa...
17603708 - A comprehensive analysis of 51 neonates with congenital intestinal atresia.
20121358 - Erosion of the spinous process: a potential cause of interspinous process spacer failure.
15148688 - Risk factors associated with postoperative sore throat after tracheal intubation: an ev...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Gastrointestinal endoscopy     Volume:  71     ISSN:  1097-6779     ISO Abbreviation:  Gastrointest. Endosc.     Publication Date:  2010 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-04-05     Completed Date:  2010-07-06     Revised Date:  2011-01-12    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0010505     Medline TA:  Gastrointest Endosc     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  782-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Digestive Diseases Center, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Adenoma / diagnosis*
Colonic Polyps / diagnosis*
Colonoscopy / standards*,  statistics & numerical data*
Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnosis*
Mass Screening / standards*,  statistics & numerical data*
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time and Motion Studies*
Comment In:
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):787-8   [PMID:  20363419 ]
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):789-91   [PMID:  20363420 ]
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):189; author reply 189-90   [PMID:  21184888 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Do we need colonoscopy in patients with gastric adenomas? The risk of colorectal adenoma in patients...
Next Document:  A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy in detecting colon polyps.