Document Detail


Effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21094367     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Current guidelines have indicated an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for patients with severe idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, for both primary and secondary prevention. Compared to coronary artery disease, the overall benefit has been smaller. A more refined risk assessment, using the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prevention mode (primary/secondary), is still needed to guide ICD implantation. Patients included in 2 large ICD registers were analyzed regarding the appropriate therapies and improvement of LVEF, overall and in subgroups of prevention mode and LVEF < 20% versus > 20%. Overall, 349 patients were included; 70% were men, the mean age was 54 years, and the mean follow-up was 33 months. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was used in 57%, and secondary prevention was present in 30%. ICD therapies were delivered to 33% of the patients, in most for ventricular tachycardia. Patients receiving an ICD for secondary prevention and non-CRT were more likely to have arrhythmic events (both p < 0.05). The cumulative event rates at 5 years were 53% for secondary and 33% for primary prevention (p < 0.001). Depending on the prevention mode and LVEF status (< 20% vs > 20%), the event rates ranged from 30% to 76%. The mean LVEF improved by 10%, independently of the stimulation mode (CRT 22% to 31%, non-CRT 26% to 35%; p < 0.0001). A persistent improvement to > 35% was seen in only 25% of CRT patients but in 45% of non-CRT patients (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the results from the present study have demonstrated that in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, the potential for LVEF improvement is considerable and that the rate of ICD interventions strongly depends on the prevention mode and LVEF. These findings could be the basis for additional risk stratification tools.
Authors:
Beat Schaer; Dominic A Theuns; Christian Sticherling; Tamas Szili-Torok; Stefan Osswald; Luc Jordaens
Related Documents :
2023017 - Predicting the outcomes of electrophysiologic studies of patients with unexplained sync...
18692437 - Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia as a predictor of sudden cardiac death in patient...
11530027 - Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope: a population-based study.
15814597 - Ventricular arrhythmia, cheyne-stokes respiration, and death: observations from patient...
281857 - Recurrent headaches in relation to temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction.
11186097 - Differences in electroencephalogram power densities between genuine narcolepsy and seco...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of cardiology     Volume:  106     ISSN:  1879-1913     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-24     Completed Date:  2011-01-20     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0207277     Medline TA:  Am J Cardiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1640-5     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. bschaer@uhbs.ch
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / physiopathology,  prevention & control
Defibrillators, Implantable*
Disease Progression
Electric Countershock / methods*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Stroke Volume / physiology*
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left / physiology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Impact of baseline severity of aortic valve stenosis on effect of intensive lipid lowering therapy (...
Next Document:  Axillary versus infraclavicular placement for endocardial heart rhythm devices in patients with pedi...